Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
12/08/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
2
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/08/2015
|
II Alignment tree list Attached
|
|
3
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
12/10/2015
|
1. Short narrative is not properly written in online performa of Part I.
2. Authority letter is not issued for the Applicant filled Part I of the proposal.
3. The georeferenced map given for CA should have at least four coordinates.
4. Total number of trees involved is 250 and an average 115 trees per ha does not account for 0.2 density. The state govt may review the density and NPV accordingly.
5. The data is not coorectly filled in point 5 of Part II.
|
|
4
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Short narrative is not properly written in online performa of Part I. 2. Authority letter is not issued for the Applicant filled Part I of the proposal. 3. The georeferenced map given for CA should have at least four coordinates. 4. Total number of trees involved is 250 and an average 115 trees per ha does not account for 0.2 density. The state govt may review the density and NPV accordingly. 5. The data is not coorectly filled in point 5 of Part II.
|
|
5
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
13/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Short narrative is not properly written in online performa of Part I. 2. Authority letter is not issued for the Applicant filled Part I of the proposal. 3. The georeferenced map given for CA should have at least four coordinates. 4. Total number of trees involved is 250 and an average 115 trees per ha does not account for 0.2 density. The state govt may review the density and NPV accordingly. 5. The data is not coorectly filled in point 5 of Part II.
|
|
6
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/10/2015
|
As per letter no 1510/12-1 dated 14-10-2015
|
|
7
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
16/10/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
8
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
02/11/2015
|
Objection Removed
|
|
9
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/11/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
10
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
06/11/2015
|
plz resend
|
|
11
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
06/11/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
12
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
02/12/2015
|
As per enclose letter no 2070/12-1 dated 01-12-2015
|
|
13
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
05/12/2015
|
CF may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office along with numbered annexures if any supporting the same.
|
|
14
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
09/12/2015
|
DFO may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office along with numbered annexures if any supporting the same.
|
|
15
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
09/12/2015
|
may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office along with numbered annexure if any supporting the same.
|
|
16
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
23/12/2015
|
objection removed
|
|
17
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
05/01/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
18
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
12/02/2016
|
To be filled by the DFO office
|
|
19
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/03/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
20
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
04/03/2016
|
plz uploaded colour map.
|
|
21
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
05/03/2016
|
it has been sent over mail already
|
|
22
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
08/03/2016
|
plz uploaded colour map. map not seen in your mail.
|
|
23
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
08/03/2016
|
mail has been sent through this office containing color maps
|
|
24
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/03/2016
|
as per letter no-3381/12-1 dated-14-03-2016.
|
|
25
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
17/03/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
26
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
21/03/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
27
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
01/04/2016
|
State Govt may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
28
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
04/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-State Govt may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
29
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
11/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-State Govt may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
30
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-State Govt may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
31
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
21/04/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
32
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
23/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
33
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
25/04/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
34
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
25/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
35
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
26/04/2016
|
ensure submission of the hard copy, stating precise resolution of the concerned quarries raised by nodal office....
|
|
36
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
29/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
37
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
03/05/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
38
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
09/05/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
39
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/05/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
40
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
27/05/2016
|
As per letter no 4341/12-1 dated 27-05-2016
|
|
41
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
08/06/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
42
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
10/06/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
43
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
17/06/2016
|
In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained.
1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I.
2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha proposed for CA and it should also be taken care that the area should not be falls in very dense and moderately dense category.
3. The hard copy of the proposal may also be provide in this office.
|
|
44
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha proposed for CA and it should also be taken care that the area should not be falls in very dense and moderately dense category. 3. The hard copy of the proposal may also be provide in this office.
|
|
45
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
22/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha proposed for CA and it should also be taken care that the area should not be falls in very dense and moderately dense category. 3. The hard copy of the proposal may also be provide in this office.
|
|
46
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
22/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha proposed for CA and it should also be taken care that the area should not be falls in very dense and moderately dense category. 3. The hard copy of the proposal may also be provide in this office.
|
|
47
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
23/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha proposed for CA and it should also be taken care that the area should not be falls in very dense and moderately dense category. 3. The hard copy of the proposal may also be provide in this office.
|
|
48
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/09/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
49
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
27/09/2016
|
please reply point no.3 raised by R.O. office ...enclose acknowledge letter received by Nodal office regarding submission of the hard copy.
|
|
50
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
30/09/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
51
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
13/10/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
52
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
14/10/2016
|
plz attached color map
|
|
53
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
18/10/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
54
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
26/10/2016
|
As per letter no 1254/12-1 dated 24-10-2016 encloser are send in E-mail
|
|
55
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/11/2016
|
CF said to be corrected in online part-i and part-ii for objection raised by regional office but the information is still not uploaded/corrected in corresponding section of Form A part-i &part-ii
|
|
56
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
05/11/2016
|
DFO said to be corrected in online part-i and part-ii for objection raised by regional office but the information is still not uploaded/corrected in corresponding section of Form A part-i &part-ii
|
|
57
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
10/11/2016
|
said to be corrected in online part-i and part-ii for objection raised by regional office but the information is still not uploaded/corrected in corresponding section of Form A part-i
|
|
58
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
03/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
59
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
06/12/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
60
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
09/12/2016
|
DFO said to be corrected in online part-i and part-ii for objection raised by regional office but the information is still not uploaded/corrected in corresponding section of Form A part-i &part-ii
|
|
61
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
13/12/2016
|
U.A said all quirries to be corrected in online part-i for objection raised by regional office but the information is still not uploaded/corrected in corresponding section of Form A part-i
|
|
62
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
63
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
20/12/2016
|
please find enclosed and corrections have been done in part I and in part II respectively..
|
|
64
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/12/2016
|
As per letter no 1844/12-1 dated 21-12-2016
|
|
65
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
23/12/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
66
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
67
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
29/12/2016
|
please forward this proposal ..as the hard copy of all enclosures have been sent to you..and also mailed ..
|
|
68
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
09/01/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 04-11-2016 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 918/12-1 dated 06-10-2016
|
|
69
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
13/01/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
70
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/01/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
71
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
18/01/2017
|
query letter has been misplaced ,,please enclosed correct letter
|
|
72
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/01/2017
|
Plz send correct letter
|
|
73
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
30/01/2017
|
CF may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again--Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha
|
|
74
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
30/01/2017
|
DFO may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again--Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha
|
|
75
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
02/02/2017
|
may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again--Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 10-06-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. The Georefrenced map uploaded in Part I is not correct and clearly visible. The GIS software generated digital map of the area proposed for CA providing geo coordinates at all corners in shape file may upload in Part I. 2. The decision support system analysis shows that the area marked for CA in KML file is only 0.05 ha area, while it should be of 4.312 ha area. The State Govt may upload revised KML file showing shape file of the area 4.312 ha
|
|
76
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
14/02/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
77
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
02/03/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
78
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
02/03/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
79
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/03/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 30-01-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 2129/12-1 dated 28-02-2017
|
|
80
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
21/03/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
81
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
22/03/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
82
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
19/04/2017
|
State Govt. may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
83
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
21/04/2017
|
State Govt. may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
84
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/05/2017
|
State Govt. may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
85
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/05/2017
|
State Govt. may attend shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
86
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
23/05/2017
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
87
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/08/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
88
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
23/08/2017
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
89
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
05/09/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
90
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/10/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
91
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/10/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 12-05-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 804/12-1 dated 11-10-2017
|
|
92
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
08/11/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
93
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
09/11/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
94
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
15/11/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
95
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
23/11/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
96
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
01/12/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
97
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
05/12/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 08-11-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshar letter no 1156/12-1 dated 22-11-2017
|
|
98
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
23/12/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
99
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
26/12/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|