| Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
|
1
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/06/2015
|
As per latter n0. 2957/12-1 date 17-06-15
|
|
|
2
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
23/06/2015
|
As per latter n0. 10343/12-1 date 23-06-15
|
|
|
3
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/06/2015
|
Hard Copy of Proposal is being sand Latter No 1154/2E.F.L., Dt. 25.06.2015
|
|
|
4
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
01/07/2015
|
As your letter 2957/12-1 date 17.06.2015 we fill all details in a pdf form
|
|
|
5
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/07/2015
|
CF recommendation file uploaded is of another road Ginibend-Samkot-Dokula. Please upload proper recommendation file.
|
|
|
6
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/07/2015
|
Cf recommendation file
|
|
|
7
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
15/09/2015
|
1. The survey of India toposheet map and the map with GPS coordinates uploaded in part I is not up to mark may prepare clear map and submit again.
2. Polygon of CA area with minimum four coordinates may provide.
3. NPV calculation may provided.
4. Information provided in point no. 5, 6, 8 and 12 of Part II is not correctly filled.
|
|
|
8
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
16/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. The survey of India toposheet map and the map with GPS coordinates uploaded in part I is not up to mark may prepare clear map and submit again. 2. Polygon of CA area with minimum four coordinates may provide. 3. NPV calculation may provided. 4. Information provided in point no. 5, 6, 8 and 12 of Part II is not correctly filled.
|
|
|
9
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. The survey of India toposheet map and the map with GPS coordinates uploaded in part I is not up to mark may prepare clear map and submit again. 2. Polygon of CA area with minimum four coordinates may provide. 3. NPV calculation may provided. 4. Information provided in point no. 5, 6, 8 and 12 of Part II is not correctly filled.
|
|
|
10
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/09/2015
|
As per latter no 1151/12-1 dated 18-09-2015
|
|
|
11
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
19/09/2015
|
please find enclosed and do provide necessary information mentioned within the enclosed.
|
|
|
12
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/10/2015
|
objection removed
|
|
|
13
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
21/10/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
14
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
26/10/2015
|
The On line objections raised by Nodal officer/Reg. Officer on date 16.09.2015 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar latter no 1414/12-1 dated 20-10-2015
|
|
|
15
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
29/10/2015
|
1.The map uploaded is not clear and not digitized.
2.If CA is in a land bank, the map of land bank with coordinates and list of proposals allotted to the land bank may be provided.
3. Please check the density and NPV calculation.
4. Please review serial no. 6 and 8-i of Form A Part II
CF may provide detailed point wise reply to objections raised by regional office dated 16-9-2015 along with numbered annexures in support of the same
|
|
|
16
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
31/10/2015
|
As per enclose letter no 1712/12-1 dated 30-10-2015
|
|
|
17
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
02/11/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
18
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
30/01/2016
|
objection removed
|
|
|
19
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/03/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
20
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
04/03/2016
|
plz uoloaded neat and clean colour map.
|
|
|
21
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/03/2016
|
neat and clean enclosures have been sent through mail
|
|
|
22
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
08/03/2016
|
plz uploaded colour map. map is not seen in your mail.
|
|
|
23
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
08/03/2016
|
please find out mail it has been sent through this office
|
|
|
24
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/03/2016
|
as per letter no-3374/12-1 dated-14-03-2016.
|
|
|
25
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
15/03/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
|
26
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
29/03/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
|
27
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
20/04/2016
|
In the reply of dated 29-03-2016 the following shortcomings are still present.
1. Density of the area proposed for diversion is mentioned as 0.2 in Part II and the letter of the State Govt but in the enclosure the NPV calculated for 0.1 need necessary correction.
2. The SoI toposheet map enclosed with the reply for the area proposed for diversion is still not readable.
3. GPS coordinate along 200-300 m including each turn of the proposed road may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I.
4. GPS coordinate for each corner of the area proposed for CA may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. The google image will not be accept for the purpose.
|
|
|
28
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
21/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 29-03-2016 the following shortcomings are still present. 1. Density of the area proposed for diversion is mentioned as 0.2 in Part II and the letter of the State Govt but in the enclosure the NPV calculated for 0.1 need necessary correction. 2. The SoI toposheet map enclosed with the reply for the area proposed for diversion is still not readable. 3. GPS coordinate along 200-300 m including each turn of the proposed road may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. 4. GPS coordinate for each corner of the area proposed for CA may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. The google image will not be accept for the purpose.
|
|
|
29
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
27/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 29-03-2016 the following shortcomings are still present. 1. Density of the area proposed for diversion is mentioned as 0.2 in Part II and the letter of the State Govt but in the enclosure the NPV calculated for 0.1 need necessary correction. 2. The SoI toposheet map enclosed with the reply for the area proposed for diversion is still not readable. 3. GPS coordinate along 200-300 m including each turn of the proposed road may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. 4. GPS coordinate for each corner of the area proposed for CA may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. The google image will not be accept for the purpose.
|
|
|
30
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
02/05/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 29-03-2016 the following shortcomings are still present. 1. Density of the area proposed for diversion is mentioned as 0.2 in Part II and the letter of the State Govt but in the enclosure the NPV calculated for 0.1 need necessary correction. 2. The SoI toposheet map enclosed with the reply for the area proposed for diversion is still not readable. 3. GPS coordinate along 200-300 m including each turn of the proposed road may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. 4. GPS coordinate for each corner of the area proposed for CA may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. The google image will not be accept for the purpose.
|
|
|
31
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
03/05/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-In the reply of dated 29-03-2016 the following shortcomings are still present. 1. Density of the area proposed for diversion is mentioned as 0.2 in Part II and the letter of the State Govt but in the enclosure the NPV calculated for 0.1 need necessary correction. 2. The SoI toposheet map enclosed with the reply for the area proposed for diversion is still not readable. 3. GPS coordinate along 200-300 m including each turn of the proposed road may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. 4. GPS coordinate for each corner of the area proposed for CA may be shown on GIS generated georefrenced map and upload the same in online part I. The google image will not be accept for the purpose.
|
|
|
32
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
12/05/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
33
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/05/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
34
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/05/2016
|
plz attached enclose
|
|
|
35
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
27/05/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
36
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/06/2016
|
as per letter no-4493/12-1 dated-06-06-2016.
|
|
|
37
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/06/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. CF may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
38
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
18/06/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. DFO may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
39
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
18/06/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
40
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
20/06/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. DFO may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
41
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
23/06/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
42
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
25/06/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. DFO may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
43
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
25/06/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
44
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
27/06/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. DFO may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
45
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
06/07/2016
|
please find enclosed and no other enclosures are required to be enclosed for further procedure....
|
|
|
46
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
13/07/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. DFO may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
47
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
13/07/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
|
48
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
49
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
17/12/2016
|
please enclose all required Maps,SOI topo sheet, geo referenced Digital map of both, CA and alignment in hard copies to this office..
|
|
|
50
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
51
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
27/12/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
52
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
09/01/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 16-06-2016 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 3263/12-1 dated 16-05-2016
|
|
|
53
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
19/01/2017
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
|
54
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
20/01/2017
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
|
55
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
03/02/2017
|
In the reply of the State Govt vide dated 20-01-2017 the following shortcomings are still remained.
1. In the KML file uploaded for CA area of 2.884 ha the polygon intersecting with the polygon of CA area proposed for other proposal no.FP/UK/Road/10903/2015 and FP/UK/Road/10143/2015. The State Govt may do the necessary correction and upload the revised KML of area 2.884 ha exclusively for this proposal.
2. The Hard copy of the proposal containing all original documents may provide to this office as directed by the ministry vide letter dated 17-11-2016.
3. The original copy of all revised documents may also be furnished to this office.
|
|
|
56
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/02/2017
|
In the reply of the State Govt vide dated 20-01-2017 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In the KML file uploaded for CA area of 2.884 ha the polygon intersecting with the polygon of CA area proposed for other proposal no.FP/UK/Road/10903/2015 and FP/UK/Road/10143/2015. The State Govt may do the necessary correction and upload the revised KML of area 2.884 ha exclusively for this proposal. 2. The Hard copy of the proposal containing all original documents may provide to this office as directed by the ministry vide letter dated 17-11-2016. 3. The original copy of all revised documents may also be furnished to this office.
|
|
|
57
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
08/02/2017
|
In the reply of the State Govt vide dated 20-01-2017 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In the KML file uploaded for CA area of 2.884 ha the polygon intersecting with the polygon of CA area proposed for other proposal no.FP/UK/Road/10903/2015 and FP/UK/Road/10143/2015. The State Govt may do the necessary correction and upload the revised KML of area 2.884 ha exclusively for this proposal. 2. The Hard copy of the proposal containing all original documents may provide to this office as directed by the ministry vide letter dated 17-11-2016. 3. The original copy of all revised documents may also be furnished to this office.
|
|
|
58
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
16/02/2017
|
In the reply of the State Govt vide dated 20-01-2017 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In the KML file uploaded for CA area of 2.884 ha the polygon intersecting with the polygon of CA area proposed for other proposal no.FP/UK/Road/10903/2015 and FP/UK/Road/10143/2015. The State Govt may do the necessary correction and upload the revised KML of area 2.884 ha exclusively for this proposal. 2. The Hard copy of the proposal containing all original documents may provide to this office as directed by the ministry vide letter dated 17-11-2016. 3. The original copy of all revised documents may also be furnished to this office.
|
|
|
59
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
17/02/2017
|
In the reply of the State Govt vide dated 20-01-2017 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In the KML file uploaded for CA area of 2.884 ha the polygon intersecting with the polygon of CA area proposed for other proposal no.FP/UK/Road/10903/2015 and FP/UK/Road/10143/2015. The State Govt may do the necessary correction and upload the revised KML of area 2.884 ha exclusively for this proposal. 2. The Hard copy of the proposal containing all original documents may provide to this office as directed by the ministry vide letter dated 17-11-2016. 3. The original copy of all revised documents may also be furnished to this office.
|
|
|
60
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
06/03/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
61
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
17/03/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
62
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/03/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 02-02-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 2294/12-1 dated 08-03-2017
|
|
|
63
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
03/04/2017
|
4. In the hard copy all documents are photocopies but as per latest instructions recived from GOI, hard copy with original / attested document is required to be furnished which may be done now but important documents like FRA certificate and digital maps of proposed road and area proposed for CA should be in original.
|
|
|
64
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
05/04/2017
|
4. In the hard copy all documents are photocopies but as per latest instructions recived from GOI, hard copy with original / attested document is required to be furnished which may be done now but important documents like FRA certificate and digital maps of proposed road and area proposed for CA should be in original.
|
|
|
65
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
06/04/2017
|
4. In the hard copy all documents are photocopies but as per latest instructions recived from GOI, hard copy with original / attested document is required to be furnished which may be done now but important documents like FRA certificate and digital maps of proposed road and area proposed for CA should be in original.
|
|
|
66
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/08/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
67
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
21/08/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
68
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
22/08/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 03-04-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 425/12-1 dated 21-08-2017
|
|
|
69
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
05/09/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
|
70
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
12/09/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
|
71
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
26/09/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
|
72
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
27/09/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
|
73
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
27/09/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
|
74
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
03/10/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
|
75
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
06/10/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
76
|
User Agency (pdpwdbgr@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/12/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
77
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
28/12/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
|
78
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
29/12/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 27-09-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 1428/12-1 dated 28-12-2017
|
|
|
79
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
03/01/2018
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
|
80
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
06/01/2018
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|