Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
26/10/2021
|
eds
|
|
2
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
11/11/2021
|
EDS query by GOK
|
|
3
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
20/11/2021
|
DyCF Gagad
|
|
4
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
07/06/2022
|
The letter detailing points raised by the User Agency has been enclosed here. Same has been sent by post to your good office.
|
|
5
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
27/06/2022
|
This proposed project no.FP/KA/MIN/42366/2019 earlier submitted as FP/KA/MIN/26675/2017 was recommended for rejection by Deputy Conservator of Forests, Territorial Division, Gadag.
Deputy Conservator of Forests, Territorial Division, Gadag expressed negative impact of this project on flora fauna, groundwater, watershed landscape, native medicinal plant species,etc., considering all the above elements to conserve the natural resources and maintain ecological balance, this proposed project is recommended for REJECTION.
|
|
6
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
06/07/2022
|
Again replied and sent to this login from CCF office by oversight. This needs to be sent to APCCF FC office. This office had already replied and sent to the CCF office on 07.06.2022
|
|
7
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/07/2022
|
This proposed project no.FP/KA/MIN/42366/2019 earlier submitted as FP/KA/MIN/26675/2017 was recommended for rejection by Deputy Conservator of Forests, Territorial Division, Gadag. Deputy Conservator of Forests, Territorial Division, Gadag expressed negative impact of this project on flora fauna, groundwater, watershed landscape, native medicinal plant species,etc., considering all the above elements to conserve the natural resources and maintain ecological balance, this proposed project is recommended for REJECTION.
|
|
8
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
13/07/2022
|
EDS reply
|
|
9
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/01/2023
|
eds
|
|
10
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
07/02/2023
|
EDS communication
|
|
11
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
08/02/2023
|
Proposal No. FP/KA/MIN/42366/2019 FORM A
EDS COMMUNICATION SENT FOR EXAMINE THE REQ OF USER AGENCY AND SUBMIT THE OPINION AT THE EARLIEST AS SOUGHT BY GOK
|
|
12
|
DFO (Gadag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
20/04/2023
|
Rejected with reasons attached with the letter.
|
|
13
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
03/05/2023
|
Rejected with reasons attached with the letter.
|
|
14
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
03/06/2024
|
Rejected as per the field officers report enclosed with this.
|
|
15
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
18/07/2024
|
eds
|
|
16
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
26/08/2024
|
EDS query
|
|
17
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
17/09/2024
|
DCF Gadag has inspected the proposed site and reported that the user agency should not be allowed to undertake any kind of mining operation in the Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctury. Hence, the proposal is rejected. Copy of the DCF report and CCF report is attached for kind perusal.
|
|
18
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Dharwad)
|
02/06/2025
|
EDS reply recommendation for rejection of the said proposal.
|
|