| Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
|
1
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
18/03/2015
|
Shortcomings noticed as per attachment please be attended at the earliest.
|
|
|
2
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (rohit.sharma@nslpower.com)
|
10/04/2015
|
Shortcomings noticed as per attachment please be attended.
|
|
|
3
|
User Agency (rohit.sharma@nslpower.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
18/04/2015
|
All queries required as per letter from DFO, Rohru have complied and is attached.
|
|
|
4
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
20/04/2015
|
All queries raised vide your office memo no. C-28-b-1599/FCA(Online)/Rohroo-11337 dt 18.03.2015 have been complied by use agency as well at DFO, Rorhu level.
Letter attached for your reference please.
|
|
|
5
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
18/06/2015
|
1.Short narrative of the project does not give any information about the project.
2.The information about the forest land diverted for the project in past not provided.
3.Village wise break up and component wise break up of total land required is not provided.
4.Forest land proposed for diversion is 22.6664 ha but it is mentioned as 21.6664 ha in the check list no 10.
5.Some of parameters have either not been covered or not quantified and expressed in monetary terms in C/B Analysis.
6.FRA certificate with annexures not submitted.
7.In RO’s report the no of trees is 193 but the no of trees is mentioned as 69 in Part-II.
8.CA scheme, copy of the map in Survey of India toposheet, scanned copy of geo-referenced map, suitability certificate, site inspection reports, muck dumping plan and
|
|
|
6
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
19/06/2015
|
1.Short narrative of the project does not give any information about the project. 2.The information about the forest land diverted for the project in past not provided. 3.Village wise break up and component wise break up of total land required is not provided. 4.Forest land proposed for diversion is 22.6664 ha but it is mentioned as 21.6664 ha in the check list no 10. 5.Some of parameters have either not been covered or not quantified and expressed in monetary terms in C/B Analysis. 6.FRA certificate with annexures not submitted. 7.In RO’s report the no of trees is 193 but the no of trees is mentioned as 69 in Part-II. 8.CA scheme, copy of the map in Survey of India toposheet, scanned copy of geo-referenced map, suitability certificate, site inspection reports, muck dumping plan and
|
|
|
7
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Shimla)
|
19/06/2015
|
1.Short narrative of the project does not give any information about the project. 2.The information about the forest land diverted for the project in past not provided. 3.Village wise break up and component wise break up of total land required is not provided. 4.Forest land proposed for diversion is 22.6664 ha but it is mentioned as 21.6664 ha in the check list no 10. 5.Some of parameters have either not been covered or not quantified and expressed in monetary terms in C/B Analysis. 6.FRA certificate with annexures not submitted. 7.In RO’s report the no of trees is 193 but the no of trees is mentioned as 69 in Part-II. 8.CA scheme, copy of the map in Survey of India toposheet, scanned copy of geo-referenced map, suitability certificate, site inspection reports, muck dumping plan and
|
|
|
8
|
CF (Shimla)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
27/06/2015
|
Shortcomings noticed as per attachment please be attended at the earliest.
|
|
|
9
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (rohit.sharma@nslpower.com)
|
08/07/2015
|
Shortcomings as noticed vide attached endorsement may please be attended at the earliest in hard as well as soft copy be uploaded.
|
|
|
10
|
User Agency (rohit.sharma@nslpower.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
08/07/2015
|
The observations asked as per your office endorsement no. 2315 dated 08.07.2015 is complied here with the letter uploaded for your information and further action at your end please.
|
|
|
11
|
DFO (Rohru)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Shimla)
|
09/07/2015
|
Observations attended by User agency as desired vide online query dated 27.06.2015 is hereby being forwarded to your office for further processing of the proposal at your end please.
|
|
|
12
|
CF (Shimla)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
10/07/2015
|
Needful as desired vide your memo.Ft.48-2949/2014 (FCA) dated 20.06.2015 done and uploaded herewith
|
|
|
13
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
30/07/2015
|
Reply submitted.
|
|
|
14
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
30/07/2015
|
Reply is submitted.
|
|