| Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
|
1
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
18/05/2016
|
There is still discrepency in the online part-II. Copy of EDS is attached.
|
|
|
2
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
19/05/2016
|
Please edit on-line form part-II to remove discrepancies pointed out by Nodal Officer.
|
|
|
3
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
24/05/2016
|
The discrepancies as pointed out by Nodal Officer have been removed and on line form Part II have been filed .
|
|
|
4
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
25/05/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
5
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
25/05/2016
|
The discrepancies as pointed out by Nodal Officer have been removed and on line form part II have been filled .
|
|
|
6
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
29/05/2016
|
The revised form part II is still not found uploaded.
|
|
|
7
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
31/05/2016
|
The revised form part II have been uploaded
|
|
|
8
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
31/05/2016
|
Go through EDS and comply with the observations raised by Nodal Officer
|
|
|
9
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
01/06/2016
|
The needful has been done
|
|
|
10
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
03/06/2016
|
The observations have been attended by User DFO. The copy of CA scheme approved by CF has also been attached.
|
|
|
11
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
06/06/2016
|
Proposal is still not complete, In SIR the specific recommendations have not been made by DFO. The extract copy of violation list is not attached. Digital map of CA site is black and white, coloured map is required to be uploaded. Instead of uploading the CA site on toposheet, still a stock map has been uploaded.
|
|
|
12
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
06/06/2016
|
Please attend remaining shortcomings carefully.Apart from this CA schceme duly approved by CFalso needs to be properly scanned and uploaded.
|
|
|
13
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
09/06/2016
|
The shortcoming as pointed out by the Nodal Officer has been removed and resubmitted please.
|
|
|
14
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/06/2016
|
Sir,
Needful has been done by the DFO.
1. The site inspection report along with recommendations have been uploaded
on site .
2. The extract copy of violation list of FCA have been uploaded.
3. The colored copy of digital map of CA scheme have been uploaded.
4. The CA scheme has been shown on toposheet and uploaded on the site.
|
|
|
15
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
22/06/2016
|
EDS
|
|
|
16
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
01/07/2016
|
Please attend the observations raised by Nodal officer.
|
|
|
17
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
15/07/2016
|
Report on violation :
1.As per record it is a case of old violation but some how it could not be included in the list of violation submitted to Hon’ble High Court.
2.Extent of violation: Total 700 mtrs = 4200 sqm.
Breakup of 700 mtrs / 4200 sqm.
a.Forest land 1818 sqm.
b.Private land 2382 sqm.
3.Reason of violation : Reason has been sought by User Agency i.e. HPPWD Rajgarh regarding why such misconduct occurred : The explanation received from HPPWD Rajgarh is enclosed as PDF file.
|
|
|
18
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/07/2016
|
DFO has given his note on violation of the case under
Report on violation: 1.As per record it is a case of old violation but some how it could not be included in the list of violation submitted to Hon’ble High Court. 2.Extent of violation: Total 700 mtrs = 4200 sqm. Breakup of 700 mtrs / 4200 sqm. a.Forest land 1818 sqm. b.Private land 2382 sqm. 3.Reason of violation : Reason has been sought from User Agency i.e. HPPWD Rajgarh regarding why such misconduct occurred :
The explanation received from HPPWD Rajgarh is enclosed as PDF file.
|
|
|
19
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
22/07/2016
|
No report on violation in the form of self contained note supported by requisite documents as required under para 1.9 of guidelines under FCA has been found placed in the folder. The explanation of UA, as has been mentioned is enclosed as PDF, has not been found uploaded.
|
|
|
20
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
01/08/2016
|
The explanation received from HPPWD Rajgarh is enclosed as PDF file. As per his report it is a case of old violation but somehow it could not be included in the list of violation submitted to Hon’ble High Court earlier.
|
|
|
21
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
26/08/2016
|
State Govt. may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
|
22
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
29/08/2016
|
EDS
|
|
|
23
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
29/08/2016
|
EDS
|
|
|
24
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
01/09/2016
|
Please attend to EDS by RO Dehradun
|
|
|
25
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
02/09/2016
|
Please attend the observations as raised by RO Dehradun of Point No. 1 to 5 & 8
|
|
|
26
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
07/10/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
27
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
10/10/2016
|
The needful has been done.
|
|
|
28
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
19/10/2016
|
I have checked Part-1 & II and observed that the EDS has not been attended properly even now. The same be now checked personally and compliance reported with in two days.The observations are also being Faxed
|
|
|
29
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
20/10/2016
|
Please attend the EDS by CF Nahan
|
|
|
30
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
20/10/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
31
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
20/10/2016
|
Please attend the EDS by CF Nahan
|
|
|
32
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
21/10/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
33
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
22/10/2016
|
As desired the needful has been done and the reply of observations as raised by RO Dehradun is also enclosed.
|
|
|
34
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
23/10/2016
|
DFO Rajgarh has attended all the observations. The case may kindly be approved expeditiously keeping in view the difficulties being faced by public.
|
|
|
35
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Nahan)
|
28/10/2016
|
Please upload the Proposed site KML file.
|
|
|
36
|
CF (Nahan)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
02/11/2016
|
Please also upload kml file of the proposed site.
|
|
|
37
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
02/11/2016
|
Please also upload kml file of the proposed site.
|
|
|
38
|
User Agency (ee-raj-hp@nic.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
03/11/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
|
39
|
DFO (Rajgarh)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Nahan)
|
04/11/2016
|
The necessary KML file of proposed site has been uploaded by the User Agency.
|
|
|
40
|
CF (Nahan)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
05/11/2016
|
The necessary KML file of proposed site has been uploaded by the User Agency now.
|
|
|
41
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
16/11/2016
|
Complete reply is submitted.
|
|
|
42
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
16/11/2016
|
Complete reply is submitted.
|
|