PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TN-09/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Tamil Nadu
 (i) State / Union Territory : Tamil Nadu  (ii) District : Dharmapuri  (iii) Forest Division : Dharmapuri  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Dharmapuri4Reserved Forest
Total 4
Division 1. : Dharmapuri
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Dharmapuri4
Total4
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
140.25Eco 3
Total. 4


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1EucalyptusNilgiri000001
2Wrigtria TingtoriaVeppalai maram010000
3Albezzia AmaraThurinji010101
4Gloriosa SuperbaThanukku maram000010
5OthersKeerimaram,Perukka maram,Sullan maram, Pasilu maram021100
6Calamus rotang (Nagabetta)Parambai maram000100
7Albizzia lebbeckVaagai maram000100
8Casurina EquisitifoliaOduvan maram010000
9Sitaphalseeta001000
10Casuarina010000
11Wrigtria TingtoriaVeppalai maram010000
Total 0 72 41 2
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 16


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Already eroded. No Soil to be eroded.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.00
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Wild boar, monitor lizard, hares, deer and reptiles.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1DharmapuriKAMMAMPATTY8692/7
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Thoppur CA Google Earth Map
2 Certificate of Suitability of CA at Thoppur
3 PART II details - Total financial outlay
4 Revised site inspection report
5 Revised Recommendation letter
6 NPV Details
7 Request Letter for not editable in PART II
8 Replies for GOI Queries
9 DGPS Points of Thoppur degraded forest
10 SI MAP of Thoppur RF CA

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Dharmapuri449777.00164901.137121.658522121.58423/05/2022121.584117.1814
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
 DharmapuriCFYesOne09/06/2022
DharmapuriDharmapuriDFOYesOne25/02/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
DharmapuriDharmapuriDFO RecommendedThe proposed road connects Vachathi to Kalasapadi via Arasanatham and Poigundanvalasu Tribal habitations in Sitheri Panchayat in Pappireddipatty Taluk, Dharmapuri District. Until now there is no any other alternative road for them to drive vehicles. This is the long lasting demand by the village peoples for the past ten years. This demand has also been raised in the Legislative Assembly often. The project proponent has given undertakings to bear the cost of Net Present Value, Additional Net Present Value, Compensatory Afforestation with maintenance and lease rent as fixed by the Forest Department at the time of sanction along with any escalation in future for the forest land to be diverted etc. The work will be permitted after strict supervision of Forest Officers. Possible damage to wild flora and fauna due to this project is very low. Considering the above facts and field observations, I recommend this proposal for seeking diversion of land.
DharmapuriCF RecommendedThere are 900 tribal families will be benefited by this project also it will helpful to effective forest protection. I recommend this proposal seeking diversion of forest land 5.00 Ha in Pallipatti, Thombakkal and Thombakkal Extnesion Reserved Forests for the formation of road from Vachathi to Kalasapadi via Arasanatham and Poigundanvalasu Tribal Habitation in Sitheri panchayat of Dharmapuri District.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Tamil NaduState SecretaryRecommended08/10/2022The Government accept the proposal and forward to MoEF and CC for their concurrence State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ChennaiRegional Office4-TNB096/2022-CHN 19/04/2023
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/147758/2021Approved In-PrincipleNo Data