Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
30/06/2015
|
1. Please provide compartment wise area details of RF involved.
|
|
2
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
30/06/2015
|
As per latter no. 3143/12-1 date 30/06/2015
|
|
3
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
01/07/2015
|
As per latter no. 10673/12-1-2 date 30/06/2015
|
|
4
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
14/07/2015
|
letter Ref 10673/12-1-2 date 30/06/2015
|
|
5
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
14/07/2015
|
please find above enclosed file
|
|
6
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/07/2015
|
1. Please provide compartment wise area details of RF involved.
|
|
7
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
15/07/2015
|
please find enclosed letter
|
|
8
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
16/07/2015
|
The On line objections raised by Nodal officer/Reg. Officer on date 30.06.2015 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 229/12-1 dated 15-07-2015.
|
|
9
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
14/09/2015
|
1.Name of the project may be rechecked.
2.The authority letter is not attached in part I.
3. Employment generation is shown as nil in part I which is not possible may rechecked.
4.FRA certificate with all annexures is not attached.
5.CA details in part II is not given and in part I it is mentioned as 2.97 ha while in CA scheme it is mentioned as 5.94 ha need correction.
6. In part II the Van Panchayat land shown as Protected forest may rectify.
7. Tree enumeration details in part II shows 206 trees however it is only 176 in forest land need correction.
8.In part II point 5, 6, 12, 8 and 13 not filled as per information asked.
9. The district profile in part II carries discrepancies in CA stipulation details.
10 DFO recommendation is not given.
|
|
10
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1.Name of the project may be rechecked. 2.The authority letter is not attached in part I. 3. Employment generation is shown as nil in part I which is not possible may rechecked. 4.FRA certificate with all annexures is not attached. 5.CA details in part II is not given and in part I it is mentioned as 2.97 ha while in CA scheme it is mentioned as 5.94 ha need correction. 6. In part II the Van Panchayat land shown as Protected forest may rectify. 7. Tree enumeration details in part II shows 206 trees however it is only 176 in forest land need correction. 8.In part II point 5, 6, 12, 8 and 13 not filled as per information asked. 9. The district profile in part II carries discrepancies in CA stipulation details. 10 DFO recommendation is not given.
|
|
11
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1.Name of the project may be rechecked. 2.The authority letter is not attached in part I. 3. Employment generation is shown as nil in part I which is not possible may rechecked. 4.FRA certificate with all annexures is not attached. 5.CA details in part II is not given and in part I it is mentioned as 2.97 ha while in CA scheme it is mentioned as 5.94 ha need correction. 6. In part II the Van Panchayat land shown as Protected forest may rectify. 7. Tree enumeration details in part II shows 206 trees however it is only 176 in forest land need correction. 8.In part II point 5, 6, 12, 8 and 13 not filled as per information asked. 9. The district profile in part II carries discrepancies in CA stipulation details. 10 DFO recommendation is not given.
|
|
12
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/09/2015
|
As per latter no 1148/12-1 dated 18-09-2015
|
|
13
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
19/09/2015
|
please find enclosed and revert it back along requisite reply.
|
|
14
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
03/10/2015
|
Reply to Bbj of RO
|
|
15
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
21/10/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
16
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
29/10/2015
|
CA KASHARI
|
|
17
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
20/11/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
18
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
02/12/2015
|
As per enclose letter no 2078/12-1 dated 01-12-2015
|
|
19
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
02/12/2015
|
Objections not rectified -you have uploaded the reply of the objection reaised by RO but attaceded documents along with reply are erroneous
|
|
20
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
04/12/2015
|
Objections not rectified -you have uploaded the reply of the objection reaised by RO but attaceded documents along with reply are erroneous
|
|
21
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
04/12/2015
|
pls find enclosed
|
|
22
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
10/12/2015
|
letter
|
|
23
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
14/12/2015
|
please find enclosed
|
|
24
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
16/12/2015
|
As per latter dated 16-12-2015
|
|
25
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
21/12/2015
|
Point wise reply received from CF is being attached herewith with consent.
|
|
26
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
22/12/2015
|
Point wise reply received from CF is being attached herewith with consent.
|
|
27
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
08/01/2016
|
State Govt. may attend the observations as per attachment.
|
|
28
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/01/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-State Govt. may attend the observations as per attachment.
|
|
29
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
11/01/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-State Govt. may attend the observations as per attachment.
|
|
30
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/01/2016
|
As per latter no 2699/12-1 dated 18-01-2016
|
|
31
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
19/01/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
32
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/01/2016
|
Sir attached bilkhet garer bheru chubatta(objection) remove
|
|
33
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
15/02/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
34
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
24/02/2016
|
as per letter no-3113/12-1 dated-19-02-2016.
|
|
35
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
08/03/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
36
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
09/03/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
37
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
21/03/2016
|
The reply of this office EDS dated 08.01.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. 09.03.2016. The observations are given below.
1. In reply to point no. 1 EDS, it is mentioned that employment will be generated during construction of road but, the employment likely to be generated is still not given in mandays. May upload information on no. of mandays likely to be generated.
2. In reply to point no. 4 of EDS, State Govt. has uploaded the geo-referenced map for the CA area but, only one geo- coordinates is shown in the map for entire 5.94 ha area which is not proper. May show geo coordinates at all corner points in polygon shape.
3. The Site Suitability Certificate for CA area is though uploaded but not opening. May upload again.
|
|
38
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
28/03/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 08.01.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. 09.03.2016. The observations are given below. 1. In reply to point no. 1 EDS, it is mentioned that employment will be generated during construction of road but, the employment likely to be generated is still not given in mandays. May upload information on no. of mandays likely to be generated. 2. In reply to point no. 4 of EDS, State Govt. has uploaded the geo-referenced map for the CA area but, only one geo- coordinates is shown in the map for entire 5.94 ha area which is not proper. May show geo coordinates at all corner points in polygon shape. 3. The Site Suitability Certificate for CA area is though uploaded but not opening. May upload again.
|
|
39
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
31/03/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 08.01.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. 09.03.2016. The observations are given below. 1. In reply to point no. 1 EDS, it is mentioned that employment will be generated during construction of road but, the employment likely to be generated is still not given in mandays. May upload information on no. of mandays likely to be generated. 2. In reply to point no. 4 of EDS, State Govt. has uploaded the geo-referenced map for the CA area but, only one geo- coordinates is shown in the map for entire 5.94 ha area which is not proper. May show geo coordinates at all corner points in polygon shape. 3. The Site Suitability Certificate for CA area is though uploaded but not opening. May upload again.
|
|
40
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
01/04/2016
|
as per letter no-3628/12-1 dated-01-04-2016.
|
|
41
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
04/04/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
42
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
13/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
43
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
07/05/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
44
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
30/05/2016
|
as per letter no-4377/12-1 dated-30-05-2016
|
|
45
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
14/06/2016
|
ShortComing in the proposal are removed as per enclosed attachemnt.
|
|
46
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
16/06/2016
|
ShortComing in the proposal are removed as per enclosed attachemnt.
|
|
47
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
24/06/2016
|
The reply of this office EDS dated 21.03.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. vide letter dated 13.06.2016 uploaded on 16.06.2016. On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found.
1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitability certificate and CA scheme for the revised areas.
|
|
48
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
28/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 21.03.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. vide letter dated 13.06.2016 uploaded on 16.06.2016. On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitability certificate and CA scheme for the revised areas.
|
|
49
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
04/07/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 21.03.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. vide letter dated 13.06.2016 uploaded on 16.06.2016. On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitability certificate and CA scheme for the revised areas.
|
|
50
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
13/07/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 21.03.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. vide letter dated 13.06.2016 uploaded on 16.06.2016. On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitability certificate and CA scheme for the revised areas.
|
|
51
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
13/07/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The reply of this office EDS dated 21.03.2016 has been submitted by the State Govt. vide letter dated 13.06.2016 uploaded on 16.06.2016. On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitability certificate and CA scheme for the revised areas.
|
|
52
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/10/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
53
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
11/11/2016
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
54
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/11/2016
|
as per letter no 1449/12-1 dated 15-11-2016
|
|
55
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
22/11/2016
|
please find enclosed
|
|
56
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
01/12/2016
|
As per letter no 1579/12-1 dated 1-12-2016
|
|
57
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
06/12/2016
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
58
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
59
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
26/12/2016
|
please forward this proposal as the hard copy has been submitted to you..and also mailed..
|
|
60
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
26/12/2016
|
please forward this proposal as the hard copy has been submitted to you..and also mailed..
|
|
61
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
09/01/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 04-07-2016 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 1050/12-1 dated 28-10-2016
|
|
62
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
27/01/2017
|
CF may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
63
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
30/01/2017
|
DFO may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
64
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
02/02/2017
|
kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
65
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/03/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
66
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
31/03/2017
|
please submit original hard copy to the R.O. office..along with filled Part I to part V..instruction received from Nodal office
|
|
67
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
17/04/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
68
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
25/04/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
69
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
26/04/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 27-01-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 2718/12-1 dated 21-04-2017
|
|
70
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
24/05/2017
|
CF may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
71
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/05/2017
|
DFO may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
72
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
21/06/2017
|
may kindly provide consolidated point wise reply to objections raised by regional office. The present reply does not correspond to the points raised by regional office. objection received from regional office is being attached herewith again On scrutiny of the geo-referenced digital map submitted for proposed CA area, following shortcomings are found. 1. As per the Decision Support System Analysis, the area proposed for CA comes to 4.90 ha instead of 5.94 ha. Moreover, 2 ha area out of 4.90 ha falls in moderately dense forest which is not considered suitable for CA. State Govt. may select CA area measuring 5.94 ha in degraded forest land only and submit revised geo-referenced digital map both in hard and soft copy. Soft copy may be submitted in .shp file, map in SoI Toposheet, suitabil
|
|
73
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
29/06/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
74
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
24/07/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
75
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
27/07/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 24-05-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 158/12-1 dated 22-07-2017
|
|
76
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
08/08/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
77
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
09/08/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
78
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
01/09/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
79
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
16/09/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
80
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/10/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
81
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/10/2017
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 08-08-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwar letter no 808/12-1 dated 11-10-2017
|
|
82
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
16/11/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
83
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
20/11/2017
|
he correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
84
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
05/12/2017
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
85
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
12/12/2017
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
86
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/12/2017
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
87
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
13/12/2017
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings mentioned in the attached document.
|
|
88
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
14/12/2017
|
please find enclosed
|
|
89
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
06/08/2018
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
90
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
08/09/2018
|
plz find enclosed plz chek your email id.
|
|
91
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
27/09/2018
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
92
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
31/10/2018
|
plz chek your email id attecth the letter
|
|
93
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
05/11/2018
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
94
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
10/12/2018
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
95
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/12/2018
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 12-12-2017 has been clarified by DFO Bageshwarletter no 1446/12-1 dated 07-12-2018
|
|
96
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
14/12/2018
|
find the letter attached
|
|
97
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
15/12/2018
|
find the letter attached
|
|
98
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
15/12/2018
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
99
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
11/02/2019
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
100
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
05/03/2019
|
please find enclosed
|
|
101
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
06/03/2019
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 14-12-2018 has been clarified by Dfo Bageswhar letter no 2306/12-1 date 05-03-2019
|
|
102
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
12/03/2019
|
find the letter attached
|
|
103
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
13/03/2019
|
find the letter attached
|
|
104
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
13/03/2019
|
find the letter attached
|
|
105
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
06/09/2019
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
106
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
18/09/2019
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
107
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
19/09/2019
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 12-03-2019 has been clarified by DFO Bageswar letter no 1078/12-1-2 dated 18-09-2019
|
|
108
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
28/09/2019
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
109
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
03/10/2019
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
110
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
25/10/2019
|
state govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
111
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
26/10/2019
|
state govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
112
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
29/10/2019
|
state govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
113
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
01/11/2019
|
state govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
114
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
01/11/2019
|
state govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
115
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
01/01/2020
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
116
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
06/01/2020
|
find the letter attached
|
|
117
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
22/01/2020
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
118
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
22/01/2020
|
KML file not uploaded
|
|
119
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
22/01/2020
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
120
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
25/01/2020
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
121
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
28/01/2020
|
The On line objections raised by Reg. Office /Nodal officer on date 29-10-2019 has been clarified by Dfo Bageshwar letter no 2164/12-1 dated 24-01-2020
|
|
122
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
03/02/2020
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
123
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
04/02/2020
|
The correction have been made as per instruction received.
|
|
124
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
18/02/2020
|
ate Govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
125
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
18/02/2020
|
State Government may attend the shortcomings as per the attachment.
|
|
126
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
18/02/2020
|
State govt may attend the short comings as per the attachment
|
|
127
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
25/02/2020
|
State govt may attend the short comings as per the attachment
|
|
128
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
28/02/2020
|
State govt may attend the short comings as per the attachment
|
|
129
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
06/01/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
130
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
01/02/2022
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
131
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
07/02/2022
|
As per letter no 3808/12-1 dated 07-02-2022
|
|
132
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
08/02/2022
|
As per letter no 3808/12-1 dated 07-02-2022
|
|
133
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
28/02/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
134
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
28/02/2022
|
plz find enclosed.
|
|
135
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/03/2022
|
As per letter no 4083/12-1 dated 28-02-2022
|
|
136
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
21/03/2022
|
State Govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
137
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
22/03/2022
|
State Govt. may attend the following shortcomings as per the attachment here
|
|
138
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
24/03/2022
|
find the letter attached
|
|
139
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
26/05/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
140
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
13/06/2022
|
send back
|
|
141
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
21/07/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
142
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
29/07/2022
|
plz find enclosed
|
|
143
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
22/08/2022
|
As per letter no 555/12-1 dated 10-08-2022
|
|
144
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
29/08/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
145
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
01/09/2022
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
146
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
12/09/2022
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings as per the EDS letter attached.
|
|
147
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
16/09/2022
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings as per the EDS letter attached.
|
|
148
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
16/09/2022
|
State Government may attend to the shortcomings as per the EDS letter attached.
|
|
149
|
CF (North Kumaun)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
19/09/2022
|
Do needful action as per EDS
|
|
150
|
DFO (Bageshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (cdpwdkapkot@gmail.com)
|
22/09/2022
|
Do needful action as per EDS
|
|