Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
21/08/2015
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
2
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
27/08/2015
|
Please remove the objection.
|
|
3
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
05/09/2015
|
1.Please review entry in serial no. 4,6,12,13 of Form A Part II 2.. Please give compartment wise area details of Reserved Forests
|
|
4
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
07/09/2015
|
Please remove objection by the nodal officer 1.Please review entry in serial no. 4,6,12,13 of Form A Part II 2.. Please give compartment wise area details of Reserved Forests
|
|
5
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
08/09/2015
|
Please remove the objection.
|
|
6
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
08/09/2015
|
Please remove objection by the nodal officer 1.Please review entry in serial no. 4,6,12,13 of Form A Part II 2. Please enter Revenue Forests for Civil soyam forests in serial no.2 regarding legal status of forests Please remove objection by the nodal officer 1.Please review entry in serial no. 4,6,12,13 of Form A Part II 2.. Please give compartment wise area details of Reserved Forests
|
|
7
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
08/09/2015
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
8
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
26/11/2015
|
clear the objection
|
|
9
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
26/11/2015
|
Clear the objection
|
|
10
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
30/11/2015
|
You have not given clear report in serial no. 4,6,12,13 of Form A Part II
|
|
11
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
17/12/2015
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
12
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
18/12/2015
|
Sir, please receive the information of the proposal
|
|
13
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
05/01/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-The online proposal is returned back since hard copy has not been submitted to this office simultaneously. State Govt. may resubmit the proposal online after hard copy has been provided in Regional Office. As a proof scanned copy of the receipt of hard copy from the Regional Office may also be uploaded along with online proposal. Attached Letter No. Misc./II/ROC/COP/1/2013/1846 Dated 06.11.2015 may also be referred in this regard.
|
|
14
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
06/01/2016
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
15
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
08/01/2016
|
2093/12-1 Date 08.01.15
|
|
16
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/01/2016
|
Sir, Please receive the information of the proposal.
|
|
17
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
13/01/2016
|
the hard copy of the proposal is not submitted yet
|
|
18
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
13/01/2016
|
the hard copy of the proposal is not submitted yet
|
|
19
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
25/01/2016
|
the hard copy of the proposal is not submitted yet
|
|
20
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
29/01/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
21
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
29/01/2016
|
Hard copy submitted in nodal office D.Dun.
|
|
22
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
01/02/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
23
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
18/03/2016
|
find the letter attached.
|
|
24
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
28/03/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-find the letter attached.
|
|
25
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
31/03/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-find the letter attached.
|
|
26
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
31/03/2016
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
27
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
01/04/2016
|
Objection by nodal office d.dun
|
|
28
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
30/04/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
29
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
09/05/2016
|
3464/12-1 Date 09.05.16
|
|
30
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
01/07/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
31
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
02/07/2016
|
Point wise reply
|
|
32
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
04/07/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
33
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
05/07/2016
|
Please point wise reply in this office
|
|
34
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
06/07/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
35
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
13/07/2016
|
153/12-1 Date 13-07-16
|
|
36
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
16/07/2016
|
Please give right information point no. 6, 8, 9 with no of part-II
|
|
37
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
21/07/2016
|
237/12-1 Date 21.07.16
|
|
38
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
22/07/2016
|
Please give answer Proper way of the proposal
|
|
39
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
02/08/2016
|
381/12-1 Date 01-08-2016
|
|
40
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
03/08/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
41
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
03/08/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. CF may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
42
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
04/08/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. CF may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
43
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
04/08/2016
|
Reply is improper and does not correspond to the queries raised by regional office. CF may provide detailed point wise reply along with corrections and numbered annexure in support of the same.
|
|
44
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
06/08/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
45
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
09/08/2016
|
527/12-1 Date 09.08.16
|
|
46
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
12/08/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
47
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
06/09/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
48
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
08/09/2016
|
Required documents uploaded for your further necessary action.
|
|
49
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
09/09/2016
|
In the reply dated 08-09-2016 the following shortcoming is still remained.
1. In the DSS analysis the area calculated 1.06 ha instead of 2.16 ha proposed for CA and out of this area 1 ha area is moderately dense forest. The State Govt may replace this area with some other area and provide revised KML and GIS generated georefrenced map of CA area on exact to the scale for complete 2.16 ha area.
|
|
50
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/09/2016
|
In the reply dated 08-09-2016 the following shortcoming is still remained. 1. In the DSS analysis the area calculated 1.06 ha instead of 2.16 ha proposed for CA and out of this area 1 ha area is moderately dense forest. The State Govt may replace this area with some other area and provide revised KML and GIS generated georefrenced map of CA area on exact to the scale for complete 2.16 ha area.
|
|
51
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
14/09/2016
|
In the reply dated 08-09-2016 the following shortcoming is still remained. 1. In the DSS analysis the area calculated 1.06 ha instead of 2.16 ha proposed for CA and out of this area 1 ha area is moderately dense forest. The State Govt may replace this area with some other area and provide revised KML and GIS generated georefrenced map of CA area on exact to the scale for complete 2.16 ha area.
|
|
52
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
14/09/2016
|
In the reply dated 08-09-2016 the following shortcoming is still remained. 1. In the DSS analysis the area calculated 1.06 ha instead of 2.16 ha proposed for CA and out of this area 1 ha area is moderately dense forest. The State Govt may replace this area with some other area and provide revised KML and GIS generated georefrenced map of CA area on exact to the scale for complete 2.16 ha area.
|
|
53
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
15/09/2016
|
In the reply dated 08-09-2016 the following shortcoming is still remained. 1. In the DSS analysis the area calculated 1.06 ha instead of 2.16 ha proposed for CA and out of this area 1 ha area is moderately dense forest. The State Govt may replace this area with some other area and provide revised KML and GIS generated georefrenced map of CA area on exact to the scale for complete 2.16 ha area.
|
|
54
|
User Agency (anilkumarbaijro@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
21/10/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
55
|
DFO (Garhwal,Pauri)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
22/10/2016
|
Please forward the proposal (1262/12-1 Date 22.10.2016
|
|
56
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
25/10/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
57
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
05/11/2016
|
ShortComing in the proposal are removed as per enclosed attachemnt.
|
|
58
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
08/11/2016
|
ShortComing in the proposal are removed as per enclosed attachemnt.
|
|