Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
16/05/2015
|
Dear sir,
please upload the file with DFO Signature.
|
|
2
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
08/06/2015
|
DFO signed papers uploaded as per DFO instruction
|
|
3
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
16/06/2015
|
Please Remove the objections as per enclosure
|
|
4
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
18/06/2015
|
Sir,
Please Remove the objections as per enclosure
|
|
5
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
27/06/2015
|
EDS removed
|
|
6
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
27/06/2015
|
sir,
please receive the proposal objection.
|
|
7
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
03/07/2015
|
Please remove the objections
|
|
8
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
04/07/2015
|
sir,
please receive the proposal objection.
|
|
9
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
09/07/2015
|
1. Please review entry of tree density at 4-ii of Part II of Form A.
2. Please give compartment wise area details of RF involved
|
|
10
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
10/07/2015
|
Please remove the objections
|
|
11
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
13/07/2015
|
Sir,
Please remove the
objections.
|
|
12
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
13/07/2015
|
EDS is related to DFO. Please give instruction to DFOr for said EDS
|
|
13
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
13/07/2015
|
Sir,
please give compartment wise area details of RF involved.
|
|
14
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
13/07/2015
|
EDS is related to DFO please give instruction DFO for removing EDS
|
|
15
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
14/07/2015
|
Sir, please give compartment wise area details of RF involved.
|
|
16
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
17/08/2015
|
Compartment area of RF
|
|
17
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
18/08/2015
|
sir,
Please remove the objection.
|
|
18
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
27/08/2015
|
compartment area of RF attached
|
|
19
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
01/09/2015
|
sir,
please receive the proposal objection.
|
|
20
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
01/09/2015
|
Please review entry of tree density at 4.II part II Form-A
|
|
21
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
01/09/2015
|
sir,
please receive the proposal objection.
|
|
22
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
02/09/2015
|
Sir, Please receive the proposal
|
|
23
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
12/10/2015
|
1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details.
2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length.
3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown.
4. The number of trees to be felled is not clear in Part II and attachment in Part I.
5. Point 5, 7 of Part II is need to be clarify.
6. Reason of Poor CA stipulation may be given.
7. Density is given in Part II attached is 0.001 while in Part II online performa is 0.4 the discrepancy may be rectify.
|
|
24
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
13/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details. 2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length. 3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown. 4. The number of trees to be felled is not clear in Part II and attachment in Part I. 5. Point 5, 7 of Part II is need to be clarify. 6. Reason of Poor CA stipulation may be given. 7. Density is given in Part II attached is 0.001 while in Part II online performa is 0.4 the discrepancy may be rectify.
|
|
25
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
27/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details. 2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length. 3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown. 4. The number of trees to be felled is not clear in Part II and attachment in Part I. 5. Point 5, 7 of Part II is need to be clarify. 6. Reason of Poor CA stipulation may be given. 7. Density is given in Part II attached is 0.001 while in Part II online performa is 0.4 the discrepancy may be rectify.
|
|
26
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
28/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details. 2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length. 3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown. 4. The number of trees to be felled is not clear in Part II and attachment in Part I. 5. Point 5, 7 of Part II is need to be clarify. 6. Reason of Poor CA stipulation may be given. 7. Density is given in Part II attached is 0.001 while in Part II online performa is 0.4 the discrepancy may be rectify.
|
|
27
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
28/10/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details. 2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length. 3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown. 4. The number of trees to be felled is not clear in Part II and attachment in Part I. 5. Point 5, 7 of Part II is need to be clarify. 6. Reason of Poor CA stipulation may be given. 7. Density is given in Part II attached is 0.001 while in Part II online performa is 0.4 the discrepancy may be rectify.
|
|
28
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
27/01/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
29
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
30/01/2016
|
Sir, please remove all objections point wise with annexure & letter attachment.
1. Authority letter is not match with the applicant details.
2. coordinates are shown on the map provided for the area proposed for diversion at every 300 m length.
3. Five villages are reported to be connect but in village wise break up only one village shown.
|
|
30
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
08/02/2016
|
EDS removed
|
|
31
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
09/02/2016
|
Sir,
proposal objection removed point wise and attached copy.
|
|
32
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/02/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
33
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
23/02/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
34
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
02/03/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
35
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
21/03/2016
|
in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained.
1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I.
2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I.
3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document.
4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify.
5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
36
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
25/04/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained. 1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I. 2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I. 3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document. 4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify. 5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
37
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
27/05/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained. 1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I. 2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I. 3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document. 4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify. 5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
38
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
27/05/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained. 1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I. 2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I. 3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document. 4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify. 5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
39
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
01/06/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained. 1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I. 2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I. 3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document. 4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify. 5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
40
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
07/09/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
41
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
07/09/2016
|
Plz reply to obj of RO with point wise and office own letter all details-in the reply dated 02-03-2016 following shortcomings are still remained. 1. Total period for which the land to be diverted in not mentioned in part I. 2. In the column designated for CA site detail is incomplete as ownership proof, MoU signed against CA site and non encumbrance certificate is not uploaded in Part I. 3. NPV calculation is also not found uploaded as additional document. 4. In the component wise break up it is not clear that the site selected for muck dumping is within the RoW of 7 m or not. Please specify. 5. Georefrenced map provided showing coordinates of proposed road at 200-300m length and each turn is still not clear and colored map.
|
|
42
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
20/09/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
43
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
21/09/2016
|
Sir,
proposal all objections removed.
|
|
44
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
23/09/2016
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
45
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
27/09/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
46
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
28/09/2016
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
47
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
21/10/2016
|
In reply of the State Govt letter dated 28-09-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained.
1. In reply of this office EDS point 4 dated 21-03-2016 the State Govt stated that the muck disposal will be carried out on private land. The State Govt may provide detail muck disposal calculation/plan along with NOCs of concerned land owners on which muck disposal is proposed.
2. In reply of this office EDS point 5 dated 21-03-2016 though the map is provided but as seen in online Part I the correct map does not uploaded at designated place of L-vi and C-iv. The State Govt may upload correct map at correct location in online Part I.
3. The hard copy of the proposal is not available in this office. The State Govt may provide the hard copy of the proposal containing authenticated copy of P
|
|
48
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
25/10/2016
|
In reply of the State Govt letter dated 28-09-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In reply of this office EDS point 4 dated 21-03-2016 the State Govt stated that the muck disposal will be carried out on private land. The State Govt may provide detail muck disposal calculation/plan along with NOCs of concerned land owners on which muck disposal is proposed. 2. In reply of this office EDS point 5 dated 21-03-2016 though the map is provided but as seen in online Part I the correct map does not uploaded at designated place of L-vi and C-iv. The State Govt may upload correct map at correct location in online Part I. 3. The hard copy of the proposal is not available in this office. The State Govt may provide the hard copy of the proposal containing authenticated copy of P
|
|
49
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
27/10/2016
|
In reply of the State Govt letter dated 28-09-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In reply of this office EDS point 4 dated 21-03-2016 the State Govt stated that the muck disposal will be carried out on private land. The State Govt may provide detail muck disposal calculation/plan along with NOCs of concerned land owners on which muck disposal is proposed. 2. In reply of this office EDS point 5 dated 21-03-2016 though the map is provided but as seen in online Part I the correct map does not uploaded at designated place of L-vi and C-iv. The State Govt may upload correct map at correct location in online Part I. 3. The hard copy of the proposal is not available in this office. The State Govt may provide the hard copy of the proposal containing authenticated copy of P
|
|
50
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
03/11/2016
|
In reply of the State Govt letter dated 28-09-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In reply of this office EDS point 4 dated 21-03-2016 the State Govt stated that the muck disposal will be carried out on private land. The State Govt may provide detail muck disposal calculation/plan along with NOCs of concerned land owners on which muck disposal is proposed. 2. In reply of this office EDS point 5 dated 21-03-2016 though the map is provided but as seen in online Part I the correct map does not uploaded at designated place of L-vi and C-iv. The State Govt may upload correct map at correct location in online Part I. 3. The hard copy of the proposal is not available in this office. The State Govt may provide the hard copy of the proposal containing authenticated copy of P
|
|
51
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
04/11/2016
|
reply of the State Govt letter dated 28-09-2016 the following shortcomings are still remained. 1. In reply of this office EDS point 4 dated 21-03-2016 the State Govt stated that the muck disposal will be carried out on private land. The State Govt may provide detail muck disposal calculation/plan along with NOCs of concerned land owners on which muck disposal is proposed. 2. In reply of this office EDS point 5 dated 21-03-2016 though the map is provided but as seen in online Part I the correct map does not uploaded at designated place of L-vi and C-iv. The State Govt may upload correct map at correct location in online Part I. 3. The hard copy of the proposal is not available in this office. The State Govt may provide the hard copy of the proposal containing authenticated copy of P
|
|
52
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
23/12/2016
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
53
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
28/12/2016
|
sir,
please remove and attachment of point no-3 objection of hard copy.
|
|
54
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
10/01/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
55
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
18/01/2017
|
Sir,
proposal all objections removed.
|
|
56
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
25/01/2017
|
Please send DFO Signature letter and enclosure
|
|
57
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
07/02/2017
|
Sir, proposal all objections removed.
|
|
58
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
07/02/2017
|
Please send soft copy of the proposal
|
|
59
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
08/02/2017
|
sir proposal objection soft copy already has been done by email,
|
|
60
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/02/2017
|
Sir, Please receive information of the proposal.
|
|
61
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
04/03/2017
|
find the letter attached
|
|
62
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
06/03/2017
|
Please remove the objetion
|
|
63
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
20/03/2017
|
Please remove the objetion
|
|
64
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
23/06/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
65
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
29/06/2017
|
Sir, proposal objection removed online.
|
|
66
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
01/07/2017
|
Sir, Please receive infotmation of the proposal
|
|
67
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
19/07/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
68
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
21/07/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
69
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
17/08/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to shortcoming mentioned in attach document.
|
|
70
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
21/08/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to shortcoming mentioned in attach document.
|
|
71
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
21/08/2017
|
State Govt. may attend to shortcoming mentioned in attach document.
|
|
72
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
22/08/2017
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
73
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
22/08/2017
|
Please remove the objection
|
|
74
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
28/08/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
75
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
29/08/2017
|
sir, please proposal soft copy send DFO email ID.
|
|
76
|
User Agency (eepwd_rpg@rediffmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
30/08/2017
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
77
|
DFO (Rudraprayag)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
30/08/2017
|
Sir, proposal objection removed online.
|
|
78
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
04/09/2017
|
Sir please receive the information of the proposal.
|
|
79
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
14/09/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|
80
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
15/09/2017
|
the asked queries have been corrected and attach herewith in Eds Letter column.
|
|