Timeline

TimeLine Details

Proposal received date at each stage of flow.

A.	General Details

(i). Proposal No. : FP/UK/ROAD/9552/2015 (ii). Name of Project for which Forest Land is required : Jwarnari Buksar Motor Road (iii). Short narrative of the proposal and Project/scheme for which the forest land is required : Construction of Jwarnari Buksar Motor Road in District Almora (Length 10.00 KM) (iv). File no. : 8B/UCP/06/61/2015-FC (v). State : Uttarakhand (vi). Category of the Project : Road (vii). Shape of forest land proposed to be diverted : Linear (viii). Area of forest land proposed for diversion(in ha.): 4.8338

Time Line

Proposal No.	Submitted by User Agency	Query for Shortcoming(if any) by Nodal Officer	Resubmission of Proposal by User Agency	Query by Nodal Officer for submitting Hard Copies	Uploading(by U.A.) of copies of receipt received from DFO & DC	Division	Circle	Nodal Office	State Government	Regional Office	Stage-I Approval on	Compliance Report Submitted by State on	Stage-II Approval on
FP/UK/ROAD/9552/2015	23/01/2015	03/02/2015	28/02/2015	25/01/2015	03/02/2015	Champawat :03/03/2015	North Kumaun: 08/05/2015 (Champawat)	Uttarakhand: 14/05/2015	Uttarakhand: 18/05/2015	Dehradun: 23/05/2015	08/10/2015 By :Regional Office	Uttarakhand 09/03/2021

C. Essential Details Sought History

Communication between Regional Office & State Government	Communication between State Government & Nodal Officer	Communication between Nodal Officer & Circle	Communication between Circle & Division	Communication between Division & User Agency
Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:10/06/2015 Replied by State Government(Uttarakhand) on:04/08/2015 Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:17/08/2015 Replied by State Government(Uttarakhand) on:14/09/2015	Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:24/06/2015 Replied by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:16/07/2015 Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:19/08/2015 Replied by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:11/09/2015	Query raised by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:24/06/2015 Replied by Circle(North Kumaun) on:13/07/2015 Query raised by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:24/08/2015 Replied by Circle(North Kumaun) on:10/09/2015	Query raised by Circle (North Kumaun) on:12/05/2015 Replied by DFO (Champawat) on:14/05/2015 Query raised by Circle (North Kumaun) on:25/06/2015 Replied by DFO (Champawat) on:13/07/2015 Query raised by Circle (North Kumaun) on:28/08/2015 Replied by DFO (Champawat) on:09/09/2015	Query raised by DFO (Champawat) on:08/04/2015 Replied by UA on :09/04/2015 Query raised by DFO (Champawat) on:09/04/2015 Replied by UA on :17/04/2015 Query raised by DFO (Champawat) on:18/04/2015 Replied by UA on :25/04/2015 Query raised by DFO (Champawat) on:12/05/2015 Replied by UA on :13/05/2015 Query raised by DFO (Champawat) on:29/06/2015 Replied by UA on :29/06/2015

D.	Essential Details Sought History (Stage-II)

Communication between Regional Office & State Government	Communication between State Government & Nodal Officer	Communication between Nodal Officer & User Agency
Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:31/03/2021 Replied by State Government(Uttarakhand) on:20/05/2023 Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:31/05/2023	Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:15/04/2021 Replied by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:20/05/2023 Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:07/06/2023	Query raised by Nodal Officer on:15/04/2021 Replied by UA on :12/05/2023 Query raised by Nodal Officer on:07/06/2023 Replied by UA on :

NOTE:- Proposal is pending at User Agency due to EDS raised by RO for Stage-II .

Close(X)

Please wait ...

Please wait ...

Proposal No.-

Sno.	From	Status	To	EDS Date	EDS sought/Replied
1	DFO (Champawat)	EDS	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	08/04/2015	please submit attachment 1.10 duly signed by all affected private land holders as per instructions in sop
2	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Champawat)	09/04/2015	Objection removed as per given instruction.
3	DFO (Champawat)	EDS	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	09/04/2015	please submit attachment 1.10 duly signed by all affected private land holders and District Mazistrate as instructed in sop
4	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Champawat)	17/04/2015	Objection removed as per given instruction.
5	DFO (Champawat)	EDS	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	18/04/2015	please submitt 1.10 as instructed in sop
6	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Champawat)	25/04/2015	Objection removed as per given instruction.
7	CF (North Kumaun)	EDS	DFO (Champawat)	12/05/2015	As per enclose letter no 2566/12-1 dated 12-05-2015
8	DFO (Champawat)	EDS	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	12/05/2015	please submitt NOC of affected van panchayats.
9	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Champawat)	13/05/2015	The correction has been made as per instruction received.
10	DFO (Champawat)	REPLY	CF (North Kumaun)	14/05/2015	sir, NOC of van panchayat is attached as per instruction received
11	Regional Office	EDS	State secretary	10/06/2015	1.Short narrative of the project for which Forest land is required does not provide any information about the project.Has to be self explanatory. 2.No date of meeting is mentioned in the proceedings of sub division level committee under FRA. 3.In land schedule width of road in RF shown 7 m but in civil soyam van panchayat and naap land it is 9 m.In performa 16 width of road in all type of forest land shown 9 m.Explain. 4. In column 14 part II providing information about district profile the data does not match with the data of district profile of Almora provided with other FCA proposals. May be reviewed.
12	State secretary	EDS	Nodal Officer	24/06/2015	Pl. reply to obj from RO - 1.Short narrative of the project for which Forest land is required does not provide any information about the project.Has to be self explanatory. 2.No date of meeting is mentioned in the proceedings of sub division level committee under FRA. 3.In land schedule width of road in RF shown 7 m but in civil soyam van panchayat and naap land it is 9 m.In performa 16 width of road in all type of forest land shown 9 m.Explain. 4. In column 14 part II providing information about district profile the data does not match with the data of district profile of Almora provided with other FCA proposals. May be reviewed.
13	Nodal Officer	EDS	CF (North Kumaun)	24/06/2015	Pl. reply to obj from RO - 1.Short narrative of the project for which Forest land is required does not provide any information about the project.Has to be self explanatory. 2.No date of meeting is mentioned in the proceedings of sub division level committee under FRA. 3.In land schedule width of road in RF shown 7 m but in civil soyam van panchayat and naap land it is 9 m.In performa 16 width of road in all type of forest land shown 9 m.Explain. 4. In column 14 part II providing information about district profile the data does not match with the data of district profile of Almora provided with other FCA proposals. May be reviewed.
14	CF (North Kumaun)	EDS	DFO (Champawat)	25/06/2015	As per enclose letter no 3056/12-1 dated 25-06-2015
15	DFO (Champawat)	EDS	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	29/06/2015	please reply to objections from RO as per letter attached
16	User Agency (eepdalmora@rediffmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Champawat)	29/06/2015	The correction have been made as per the instruction received.
17	DFO (Champawat)	REPLY	CF (North Kumaun)	13/07/2015	as per letter enclosed
18	CF (North Kumaun)	REPLY	Nodal Officer	13/07/2015	The On line objections raised by Reg. office on date 24.06.2015 has been clarified by DFO Champawat. corrections have been made in letter no 54/12-294 dated 08-07-2015.
19	Nodal Officer	REPLY	State secretary	16/07/2015	1. Short narrative is already given as additional information file in Form A Part I and is reproduced in file attached. 2. Complete FRA documents with date is given in attached file. 3. Width of road is 9m. 4. District profile is different because the proposal is in Champawat division of which a small portion is in Almora district and rest in Champawat district. Updated District profile for Almora, Champawat and other districts have already been sent separately to Regional office.
20	State secretary	REPLY	Regional Office	04/08/2015	Reply as received from User agency, DFO, CF and Nodal with consent 1. Short narrative is already given as additional information file in Form A Part I and is reproduced in file attached. 2. Complete FRA documents with date is given in attached file. 3. Width of road is 9m. 4. District profile is different because the proposal is in Champawat division of which a small portion is in Almora district and rest in Champawat district. Updated District profile for Almora, Champawat and other districts have already been sent separately to Regional office.
21	Regional Office	EDS	State secretary	17/08/2015	1.In the list of trees in part II the no. of trees in 31 to 60 cm girth class have not been given whereas 85 trees are mentioned to be available in this girth class in the list of trees provided as additional document with part I. List of trees in part II.
22	State secretary	EDS	Nodal Officer	19/08/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-1.In the list of trees in part II the no. of trees in 31 to 60 cm girth class have not been given whereas 85 trees are mentioned to be available in this girth class in the list of trees provided as additional document with part I. List of trees in part II.
23	Nodal Officer	EDS	CF (North Kumaun)	24/08/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-1.In the list of trees in part II the no. of trees in 31 to 60 cm girth class have not been given whereas 85 trees are mentioned to be available in this girth class in the list of trees provided as additional document with part I. List of trees in part II.
24	CF (North Kumaun)	EDS	DFO (Champawat)	28/08/2015	As pet latter no. 777/12-1 date 28/08/2015
25	DFO (Champawat)	REPLY	CF (North Kumaun)	09/09/2015	as per letter enclosed
26	CF (North Kumaun)	REPLY	Nodal Officer	10/09/2015	The On line objections raised by Nodal officer/Reg. Officer on date 24.08.2015 has been clarified by DFO Champawat latter no 730/12-1 dated 09-09-2015.
27	Nodal Officer	REPLY	State secretary	11/09/2015	this is the reply by user agency consider through CF and DFO
28	State secretary	REPLY	Regional Office	14/09/2015	this is the reply by user agency consider through CF and DFO