Timeline

TimeLine Details

Proposal received date at each stage of flow.

A.	General Details

(i). Proposal No. : FP/UK/ROAD/11082/2015 (ii). Name of Project for which Forest Land is required : Extenction of Pantgoun chamarkhan Sailapani motor Roa(Simaldhar to Sailapani milan) (iii). Short narrative of the proposal and Project/scheme for which the forest land is required : This is a road project of length 4.50 Km. joining the village Simaldhar in Almora Distt Uttarkahnd (iv). File no. : 8B/UCP/06/129/2015/FC (v). State : Uttarakhand (vi). Category of the Project : Road (vii). Shape of forest land proposed to be diverted : Linear (viii). Area of forest land proposed for diversion(in ha.): 1.935

Time Line

Proposal No.	Submitted by User Agency	Query for Shortcoming(if any) by Nodal Officer	Resubmission of Proposal by User Agency	Query by Nodal Officer for submitting Hard Copies	Uploading(by U.A.) of copies of receipt received from DFO & DC	Division	Circle	Nodal Office	State Government	Regional Office	Stage-I Approval on	Stage-II Approval on
FP/UK/ROAD/11082/2015	19/03/2015	aa		21/03/2015	27/03/2015	Almora :27/03/2015	North Kumaun: 10/04/2015 (Almora)	Uttarakhand: 17/04/2015	Uttarakhand: 01/05/2015	Dehradun: 06/05/2015	13/11/2015 By :Regional Office

C. Essential Details Sought History

Communication between Regional Office & State Government	Communication between State Government & Nodal Officer	Communication between Nodal Officer & Circle	Communication between Circle & Division	Communication between Division & User Agency
Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:25/06/2015 Replied by State Government(Uttarakhand) on:19/08/2015 Query raised by Regional Office (Dehradun) on:02/10/2015 Replied by State Government(Uttarakhand) on:28/10/2015	Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:25/06/2015 Replied by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:15/08/2015 Query raised by State Government (Uttarakhand) on:03/10/2015 Replied by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:27/10/2015	Query raised by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:01/07/2015 Replied by Circle(North Kumaun) on:06/08/2015 Query raised by Nodal Officer (Uttarakhand) on:03/10/2015 Replied by Circle(North Kumaun) on:26/10/2015	Query raised by Circle (North Kumaun) on:03/07/2015 Replied by DFO (Almora) on:31/07/2015 Query raised by Circle (North Kumaun) on:07/10/2015 Replied by DFO (Almora) on:21/10/2015	Query raised by DFO (Almora) on:04/07/2015 Replied by UA on :25/07/2015 Query raised by DFO (Almora) on:09/10/2015 Replied by UA on :15/10/2015

NOTE:- Stage-I Approval accorded by : Regional Office .

Close(X)

Please wait ...

Please wait ...

Proposal No.-

Sno.	From	Status	To	EDS Date	EDS sought/Replied
1	Regional Office	EDS	State secretary	25/06/2015	1. The area for CA should be double the area proposed for diversion but in Part I it is mentioned as equivalent need to be rectify. 2. The density mentioned in Part II is 0.3 and in NPV calculation 0.5 need to be correct and calculation of NPV accordingly. 3. Point 5 and 12 of Part II the information given in form of No Data which is not the right way to express need correction. 4.The tree enumeration list enclosed with the proposal is not opening kindly update it correctly in order to view the exact number of tree to be felled in forest land.
2	State secretary	EDS	Nodal Officer	25/06/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-1. The area for CA should be double the area proposed for diversion but in Part I it is mentioned as equivalent need to be rectify. 2. The density mentioned in Part II is 0.3 and in NPV calculation 0.5 need to be correct and calculation of NPV accordingly. 3. Point 5 and 12 of Part II the information given in form of No Data which is not the right way to express need correction. 4.The tree enumeration list enclosed with the proposal is not opening kindly update it correctly in order to view the exact number of tree to be felled in forest land.
3	Nodal Officer	EDS	CF (North Kumaun)	01/07/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-1. The area for CA should be double the area proposed for diversion but in Part I it is mentioned as equivalent need to be rectify. 2. The density mentioned in Part II is 0.3 and in NPV calculation 0.5 need to be correct and calculation of NPV accordingly. 3. Point 5 and 12 of Part II the information given in form of No Data which is not the right way to express need correction. 4.The tree enumeration list enclosed with the proposal is not opening kindly update it correctly in order to view the exact number of tree to be felled in forest land.
4	CF (North Kumaun)	EDS	DFO (Almora)	03/07/2015	As per latter no. 13/12-1 date 03/07/2015
5	DFO (Almora)	EDS	User Agency (anandb070@gmail.com)	04/07/2015	Objection
6	User Agency (anandb070@gmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Almora)	25/07/2015	objection reply
7	DFO (Almora)	REPLY	CF (North Kumaun)	31/07/2015	Objection Reply
8	CF (North Kumaun)	REPLY	Nodal Officer	06/08/2015	The On line objections raised by Nodal officer/Reg. Officer on date 01.07.2015 has been clarified by Almora letter no 645/12-1 dated 31-07-2015.
9	Nodal Officer	REPLY	State secretary	15/08/2015	Reply to obj by RO has been received from user agency through DFO and CF and is being forwarded with consent
10	State secretary	REPLY	Regional Office	19/08/2015	Reply to obj by RO has been received from user agency through DFO and CF and is being forwarded with consent
11	Regional Office	EDS	State secretary	02/10/2015	Following shortcomings still remain in the reply to EDS dated 25.06.2015 of this office 1. The no. of trees shown on the forest land proposed for diversion in the list attached as additional document with part I is 139 but the no. of trees involved in the proposal is mentioned as 164 in column 4 part II filled by the DFO. Correct no. of trees to be filled in part II.
12	State secretary	EDS	Nodal Officer	03/10/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-Following shortcomings still remain in the reply to EDS dated 25.06.2015 of this office 1. The no. of trees shown on the forest land proposed for diversion in the list attached as additional document with part I is 139 but the no. of trees involved in the proposal is mentioned as 164 in column 4 part II filled by the DFO. Correct no. of trees to be filled in part II.
13	Nodal Officer	EDS	CF (North Kumaun)	03/10/2015	Plz reply to obj of RO-Following shortcomings still remain in the reply to EDS dated 25.06.2015 of this office 1. The no. of trees shown on the forest land proposed for diversion in the list attached as additional document with part I is 139 but the no. of trees involved in the proposal is mentioned as 164 in column 4 part II filled by the DFO. Correct no. of trees to be filled in part II.
14	CF (North Kumaun)	EDS	DFO (Almora)	07/10/2015	As per latter no. 1367/12-1 date 07/10/2015
15	DFO (Almora)	EDS	User Agency (anandb070@gmail.com)	09/10/2015	Objection
16	User Agency (anandb070@gmail.com)	REPLY	DFO (Almora)	15/10/2015	objection reply
17	DFO (Almora)	REPLY	CF (North Kumaun)	21/10/2015	As per latter no. 2268/12-1 date 20/10/2015
18	CF (North Kumaun)	REPLY	Nodal Officer	26/10/2015	The On line objections raised by Nodal officer/Reg. Officer on date 03.10.2015 has been clarified by DFO Almora latter no 2268/12-1 dated 20-10-2015
19	Nodal Officer	REPLY	State secretary	27/10/2015	Tree details entered in online form has been corrected to 139 trees in forest area only.
20	State secretary	REPLY	Regional Office	28/10/2015	Tree details entered in online form has been corrected to 139 trees in forest area only.