Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
09/09/2015
|
01.SHORT NARRATIVE OF PROJECT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT.
02.PERIOD FOR WHICH FOREST LAND IS PROPOSED TO BE DIVERTED IS NOT MENTIONED.
03.ONLINE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY SHRI DHAN SINGH KUTIYAL BUT THE AUTHORIZATION LETTER IS ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF SHRI GOVIND BALLABH JOSHI.
04.DATE IS NOT MENTIONED IN FRA CERTIFICATE.
05.IN NPV CALCULATION, DENSITY IS MENTIONED AS 0.3 BUT NPV RATE IS CHARGED FOR VERY DENSE FOREST CATEGORY.
06.DFO HAS NOT GIVEN ANY COMMENT ABOUT VULNERABILITY OF FOREST AREA TO EROSION.
07.APPROXIMATE DISTANCE OF PROPOSED SITE OF DIVERSION FROM BOUNDARY OF FOREST IS NOT GIVEN.
08.PROGRESS OF CA IS 55% ONLY WHICH IS NOT SATIS
|
|
2
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
14/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-01.SHORT NARRATIVE OF PROJECT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT. 02.PERIOD FOR WHICH FOREST LAND IS PROPOSED TO BE DIVERTED IS NOT MENTIONED. 03.ONLINE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY SHRI DHAN SINGH KUTIYAL BUT THE AUTHORIZATION LETTER IS ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF SHRI GOVIND BALLABH JOSHI. 04.DATE IS NOT MENTIONED IN FRA CERTIFICATE. 05.IN NPV CALCULATION, DENSITY IS MENTIONED AS 0.3 BUT NPV RATE IS CHARGED FOR VERY DENSE FOREST CATEGORY. 06.DFO HAS NOT GIVEN ANY COMMENT ABOUT VULNERABILITY OF FOREST AREA TO EROSION. 07.APPROXIMATE DISTANCE OF PROPOSED SITE OF DIVERSION FROM BOUNDARY OF FOREST IS NOT GIVEN. 08.PROGRESS OF CA IS 55% ONLY WHICH IS NOT SATI
|
|
3
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
16/09/2015
|
Plz reply to obj of RO-01.SHORT NARRATIVE OF PROJECT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT. 02.PERIOD FOR WHICH FOREST LAND IS PROPOSED TO BE DIVERTED IS NOT MENTIONED. 03.ONLINE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY SHRI DHAN SINGH KUTIYAL BUT THE AUTHORIZATION LETTER IS ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF SHRI GOVIND BALLABH JOSHI. 04.DATE IS NOT MENTIONED IN FRA CERTIFICATE. 05.IN NPV CALCULATION, DENSITY IS MENTIONED AS 0.3 BUT NPV RATE IS CHARGED FOR VERY DENSE FOREST CATEGORY. 06.DFO HAS NOT GIVEN ANY COMMENT ABOUT VULNERABILITY OF FOREST AREA TO EROSION. 07.APPROXIMATE DISTANCE OF PROPOSED SITE OF DIVERSION FROM BOUNDARY OF FOREST IS NOT GIVEN. 08.PROGRESS OF CA IS 55% ONLY WHICH IS NOT SATI
|
|
4
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
16/09/2015
|
Please remove the objection Plz reply to obj of RO-01.SHORT NARRATIVE OF PROJECT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT. 02.PERIOD FOR WHICH FOREST LAND IS PROPOSED TO BE DIVERTED IS NOT MENTIONED. 03.ONLINE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED BY SHRI DHAN SINGH KUTIYAL BUT THE AUTHORIZATION LETTER IS ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF SHRI GOVIND BALLABH JOSHI. 04.DATE IS NOT MENTIONED IN FRA CERTIFICATE. 05.IN NPV CALCULATION, DENSITY IS MENTIONED AS 0.3 BUT NPV RATE IS CHARGED FOR VERY DENSE FOREST CATEGORY. 06.DFO HAS NOT GIVEN ANY COMMENT ABOUT VULNERABILITY OF FOREST AREA TO EROSION. 07.APPROXIMATE DISTANCE OF PROPOSED SITE OF DIVERSION FROM BOUNDARY OF FOREST IS NOT GIVEN. 08.PROGRESS OF CA IS 55% ONLY WHICH IS NOT SATI
|
|
5
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pwdtharali@gmail.com)
|
19/09/2015
|
please remove the Indian gov. objections as per file attached.
|
|
6
|
User Agency (pwdtharali@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
29/12/2015
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
7
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (pwdtharali@gmail.com)
|
04/01/2016
|
Please give the point answer and attach scene file also.
|
|
8
|
User Agency (pwdtharali@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
13/01/2016
|
Objections removed as per file attached.
|
|
9
|
DFO (Badrinath,Gopeshwar)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
20/01/2016
|
Sir please find the attachment.
|
|
10
|
CF (Garhwal)
|
REPLY
|
Nodal Officer
|
20/01/2016
|
Sir, Please receive the information of the proposal.
|
|
11
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
05/02/2016
|
point wise reply as received from cf attached here with contents.
|
|
12
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
05/02/2016
|
point wise reply as received from cf attached here with contents.
|
|