Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
01/02/2021
|
EDS raised against the proposal for diversion of 154.084 Ha. Forest Land for construction of Kutulisinga Irrigation Project by Executive Engineer Cuttack Investigation Division.
|
|
2
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
09/07/2021
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
3
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
03/08/2021
|
5 Nos. of compliance required mentioned in EDS letter no.4777 dt.02.08.2021
|
|
4
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
20/11/2021
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
5
|
CF (Angul)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
03/01/2022
|
DFO Athmallik to submit compliance alongwith resubmission of diversion proposal.
|
|
6
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Angul)
|
07/07/2022
|
1. The Undersigned has prepared Catchment Area Treatment Plant as per One Time Cost Norm as Revised wage rate @ 326/- per man day.
2. As per revised tree enumeration, it is ascertained that, another 169 Nos of trees falling in the Kutulusinga Revenue village (Patch No. 37,38,39,40 & 42) and are included in the revised tree enumeration report.
|
|
7
|
Nodal Officer
|
EDS
|
CF (Angul)
|
24/08/2022
|
Please comply the EDS vide this Memo letter No. 16273 dated 22.08.2022.
|
|
8
|
CF (Angul)
|
EDS
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
20/09/2022
|
DFO, Athmallik Division to comply the observation made by by PCCF, Odisha and resubmit the proposal
|
|
9
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
20/09/2022
|
The Superintending Engineer, Angul Investigation Division, Angul is requested to comply the observation made by P.C.C.F., Odisha, Bhubaneswar and resubmit the proposal.
|
|
10
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
16/11/2024
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
11
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
07/12/2024
|
The cost-benefit analysis submitted by the user agency is not adequately justified and lacks clarity in correlating the proposed benefits with the costs involved. You are requested to provide a revised and well-justified cost-benefit analysis, detailing the benefits in monetary terms as per the guidelines
|
|
12
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
13/12/2024
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
13
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
19/12/2024
|
The cost-benefit analysis submitted by the user agency is old/ incorrect.
|
|
14
|
User Agency (fdpkutulsingha@gmail.com)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
19/12/2024
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
15
|
DFO (Athamallik)
|
REPLY
|
CF (Angul)
|
20/12/2024
|
As per observation made by the PCCF (Nodal) vide his Memo No.16275 Dt.22.08.2022, the DFO, Athmallik Division complied the said observations.
|
|