Sno. | From | Status | To | EDS Date | EDS sought/Replied | EDS Letter |
1
|
DFO (Jaintia Hills)
|
EDS
|
User Agency (mines@hccl.in)
|
09/02/2021
|
The current CA land identified is not near to Reserve Forest. Kindly identify the land next to Reserve Forest, which is contiguous and free from encroachment
|
|
2
|
User Agency (mines@hccl.in)
|
REPLY
|
DFO (Jaintia Hills)
|
20/04/2021
|
The correction have been made as per the instruction received
|
|
3
|
Regional Office
|
EDS
|
State secretary
|
11/04/2022
|
The State Govt. is requested to provide following additional information for further processing of the case:
I. The State Govt may submit a self-contained report as per Para 3 B (iii) & (iv) of Ministry's letter dated 29/1/2018.
II. The detail breakup of land requirement submitted in the proposal is for Green Belt - 0.603 ha & Dump Yard - 0.195 ha; whereas others required i.e. quarry area, safety zone, approach road, if any, for proposed diversion of 4.0 ha may be submitted.
III. Status of land use and FC approval and other land identified as 'forest' namely 50% of the plant area of 68.313 ha, 16 ha & 40 ha of limestone mine.
IV. The date of issue of Letter of Intent (LOI) for grant of mining lease is 16th November, 2010. Hence its validity may be furnished.
V. Mutation Notification
|
|
4
|
State secretary
|
EDS
|
Nodal Officer
|
11/12/2023
|
Essential details
|
|
5
|
Nodal Officer
|
REPLY
|
State secretary
|
20/12/2023
|
Additional information furnished vide letter dated 31.10.2023 as desired by the IRO for further necessary action.
|
|
6
|
State secretary
|
REPLY
|
Regional Office
|
09/12/2024
|
The aforesaid User Agency is not an intentional violator as they got valid mining list under Rule 24(4) of Major Minerals Concession Rules, 1960 after the due compliance complied. Further, as advised by the Joint Inspection Team (JIT) the User Agency to apply for Forest Clearance under Section 2 of Forest Conservation Act, 1980, the User Agency has applied for the same and is now under process. Based on the facts as per the records in this office, the undersigned is of the considered opinion that there is no scope for imposing for penalty. Hence, it is requested to consider and the User Agency maybe exempted from the payment of penalty and to grant Forest Clearance for the said proposal.
|
|