PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TN-017/2015
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Tamil Nadu
 (i) State / Union Territory : Tamil Nadu  (ii) District : Kanyakumari  (iii) Forest Division : Kanyakumari  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.88  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Kanyakumari0.88Protected Forest
Total 0.88
Division 1. : Kanyakumari
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.880.4Eco 3
Total. 0.88


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersMeligera01945000
2OthersManjanathi0270000
3OthersVembu060000
4OthersVagai060000
5Acacia leucophloeaVelvel0191100
6OthersOdai0140000
7Albezzia AmaraUsil041000
8Prosophis JulifloraProsophis020000
9Gmelina AroboreaKumil010000
10Tamarindus IndicaPuli010000
11Cassia SiameaKonnai010000
12Anacardium OccidentaleMunthiri010000
13OthersKodikalli010000
14OthersMavalinkam010000
15OthersVedathalai010000
Total 0 2797 10 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 287


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : It forms part of low country with flat to gentle slope covered with short stature trees and thorny scrub vegetation. In order to prevent erosion a stone wall needs to be erected
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Jungle cat, Small Indian civet, Common palm civet, Bonnet macaque, Wild boar, Indian Porcupine, Indian Pangolin, Common mangoose, Jackal, Monitor lizard and Birds
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : By formation of National Highway on the forest edge risk of injury to Wildlife while crossing the road is high unless and otherwise a protection wall is constructed along the road boundary in the immediate viscinity of the forest
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The road forms part of ESZ and may lead to sound and air pollution
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : By formation of National Highway on the forest edge risk of injury to Wildlife while crossing the road is high unless and otherwise a protection wall is constructed along the road boundary in the immediate vicinity of the forest
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kanyakumari16726850138.074.38794101/01/20041
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
KanyakumariTirunelveliDFOYesTwo12/08/2015,17/11/2015
 TirunelveliCFYesOne31/12/2015
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
KanyakumariTirunelveliDFO Recommended
TirunelveliCF RecommendedThe new road formation is for the national development. Hence I recommend for diversion of an extent of 0.88 Ha of forest land for the above purpose.
quetiapin ritalin markenavntablet.site quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
quetiapin ritalin markenavntablet.site quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Tamil NaduState SecretaryRecommended25/05/2017 20 years State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ChennaiRegional Office4-TNB011/2017-CHN09/05/2018
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/2015ROAD98182015014316780003167800027 Dec 2018CNRBR52018122700788799Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/2015ROAD981820155436281603628160314 Sep 2018CNRBR52018091400751177Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)
19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) : No
20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.Verified DateMutation LetterRemarks
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/201528 Sep 2018No DataThe land required for diversion is only 0.88 ha. Hence the CA not necessary
21. Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.Compliance Details submitted on(Date)Uploaded Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/201528 Sep 2018
22. Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.RemarksVerified DateUploaded Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/2015Compliance report send for requesting Stage II approval.22 Jan 2019
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/9818/201530 Jul 2021APPROVED