PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TN-08/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Tamil Nadu
 (i) State / Union Territory : Tamil Nadu  (ii) District : Madurai  (iii) Forest Division : Madurai  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.1275  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Madurai0.1275Reserved Forest
Total 0.1275
Division 1. : Madurai
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Madurai0.1275
Total0.1275
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.12750.4Eco 4
Total. 0.1275


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Babulkaruvel000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The Proposed area falls under the following working circle:- 1)Forest Protection WC 2)Wildlife Management WC 3)Biodiversity Conservation WC 4)JFM and Eco-restoration WC
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : This is less prone to soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.032
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Indian Guar
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 149638
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
111Reserve LandMadurai0    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1
2
3
4

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Madurai3741735172527.82561226.80510/03/202226.80517.56
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
MaduraiMaduraiDFOYesOne04/03/2022
 MaduraiCFYesOne04/08/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MaduraiMaduraiDFO RecommendedThe diversion of RF portion for black topping of road is essential for ensuring better connectivity and provision of essential services to the villages and hamlets. There is no felling of trees involved and least interference to the forest observed. The project is for welfare of the surrounded village peoples to have good access the District Road which is long pending. Based on the public necessity, the proposal is Recommended.
MaduraiCF RecommendedTo lay the road, no tree felling and damage to the adjacent RF, with this in view and also considering necessity of public, it is considered and proposal for diversion may be recommended with speed breakers and sign boards wherever necessary by the User AgencyYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended