PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TN-011/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Tamil Nadu
 (i) State / Union Territory : Tamil Nadu  (ii) District : Salem  (iii) Forest Division : Salem  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 4.8  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Salem4.8Reserved Forest
Total 4.8
Division 1. : Salem
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Salem4.8
Total4.8
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
14.80.4Eco 3
Total. 4.8


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area is a barren hillock with thorny bushes and the area is not vulnerable to soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : There is no specific wildlife found in that localaity
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1SalemKurichi124.5272/1
2SalemKurichi9.672/1
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Salem524500124151224.7614478.1531/01/2018424.2968.06
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
SalemSalemDFOYesOne13/02/2018
 SalemCFYesOne16/02/2018
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
SalemSalemDFO RecommendedIn order to have approach road to the Jarugumalai (Keelur and Melur traibal villages) from Erumapalayam-panangadu village, (which is located at the foot hills of the Jarugumalai Reserved Forest), an admitted right of way to a width of 10 yards (9.00 m) to a length of 1.60km was admitted under section 16 notification of the Jarugumalai Reserved Forest. Since the right of way is not possible to be improved as a road and it is not within the permissible gradient, hence a new alignment has been prop
SalemCF RecommendedThe forest land required for the purpose as indicated in part-I is unavoidable and is barest minimum, considering the gradient to align the road to reach the hill top where the village of Jarugumalai (Keelur and Melur) located as enclosure in Jarugumalai Reserved Forests. There is no rare/endangered/unique species of flora fauna found in this area. There is no protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other improvement monument located in this area. As such the details Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedBased on site inspection and recommendation of District Forest Officer and Conservator of Forests Salem the proposal is recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Tamil NaduState SecretaryRecommended26/02/2018 Recommended State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ChennaiRegional Office4-TNB019/2018-CHN18/04/2018
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentUploaded Demand Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/21074/2016ROAD210742016990126048001260480008 Jun 2018SBINR52018080600054359Corporation BankCorporation Bank (Challan)
19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
  (i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal : Yes   (ii). Total Land identified for raising CA: 9.6   (iii). No. of Maintenance years: 7   (iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel: 1
  No. of patches : 1
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1Block(Polygon)9.6
  Status of CA Land so identified : Non Forest Area   Site Name : Kurichi   Location Details : Kurichi   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :   Mutation Status : Mutated
Mutation Status
Circle Name. Name of Division. Name of Range. Mutation Order No. Mutation Date How Much Area of Mutated Land Received Mutation Letter
SalemAtturVazhapadi23954/2017/K311 Sep 20189.6
20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.Verified DateMutation LetterRemarks
FP/TN/ROAD/21074/201603 Oct 2018No DataThe User Agency is informed to upload the form of verification of conditions stipulated in Stage I clearance in the web portal so as to furnish compliance report to the GOI for issuing Stage II final approval.
21. Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.Compliance Details submitted on(Date)Uploaded Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/21074/201608 Oct 2018
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/TN/ROAD/21074/201620 Nov 2018APPROVED