PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : RJ-07/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Rajasthan
 (i) State / Union Territory : Rajasthan  (ii) District : Jaipur  (iii) Forest Division : Jaipur Wildlife,Jaipur (North) Territorial  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 4.584  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Jaipur Wildlife3.2385Reserved Forest
2Jaipur (North) Territorial1.3455Reserved Forest
Total 4.584
Division 1. : Jaipur (North) Territorial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Jaipur1.3435
Total1.3435
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.34550.1Eco 3
Total. 1.3455


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersNA000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Afforestation Management Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area is not vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Blue Bull, Leopard, Peacock, Other Birds and Reptile species etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1JaipurDANTLI4.584324/319
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Non Violation CC
2 Land Suitablity CC
3 NPV CC
4 Check list No 18 NFL DFL 149378
5 Gazatte Notification
6 Specific Recommendations
7 CA NFL Detailed Estimate 149378
8 Site Inspection Report
9 GT Sheet Map CA NFL
10 CA DFL Detailed Estimate
11 Digital map CA NFL
Division 2. : Jaipur Wildlife
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Jaipur3.2385
Total3.2385
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
13.238550Eco 3
Total. 3.2385


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Acacia NiloticaNeem000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Rainfall in the region is low. The area is has plain topography with almost zero gradient. So, thearea is less vulnerable for soil erosion given the edaphic and climatic factors.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Species found in the area area as follows:- Tiger, leopard, porcupine, hyena, jackal, peacock etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The proposed project is not going to put any major adverse impact on the bio-diversity of the area as this project involves up gradation of existing road.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1JaipurDANTLI4.584324/319
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Recommendation report
2 Conservation value report
3 Impact Report
4 Site inspection report

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Jaipur1114300554864.171021/02/202304.17
2Jaipur111439094868492.178925493.430108/08/2023555.1341.10
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Jaipur WildlifeSariska Tiger Reserve (Wildlife), AlwarDFOYesOne14/02/2023
Jaipur (North) TerritorialJaipurDFOYesOne20/03/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Jaipur WildlifeSariska Tiger Reserve (Wildlife), AlwarDFO RecommendedThe required conversation of land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and is minimum required for the project
Jaipur (North) TerritorialJaipurDFO RecommendedThe requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency in Col. 2 of part I is unavoidable and is barest minimum required for the project. In the public interest the proposal is recommended for acceptance.
JaipurCF Recommended In the public interest the proposal is recommended for acceptance.Yes
Sariska Tiger Reserve (Wildlife), AlwarCF RecommendedAgreed with DCF comments. Proposal is recommendedYes