PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
RJ-045/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Rajasthan
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Rajasthan
(ii)
District :
Pratapgarh
(iii)
Forest Division :
Pratapgarh Territorial
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
3.468
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Pratapgarh Territorial
3.468
Protected Forest
Total
3.468
Division 1. : Pratapgarh Territorial
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Pratapgarh
3.468
Total
3.468
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.468
0.2
Eco 3
Total.
3.468
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Butea Monosperma
palash
78
15
6
1
0
0
2
Acacia Nilotica
babool
0
1
2
1
1
0
3
Terminialia Crenulata
sadar
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
Ziayphus xylopyra
ber
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
Bombax Ceiba
zizha
3
0
0
0
0
0
6
Aegle Marmelos
Bhelpatra
7
1
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Umbyia
2
0
0
0
0
0
8
Albezzia Labbeck
Sirash
2
0
0
0
0
0
9
Others
kADAYA
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
Others
kADAM
2
0
0
0
1
0
11
Others
KALPATTA/LASODA
5
0
0
0
0
0
12
Acacia leucophloea
RONJ
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
Azadirachta Indica
NEEM
1
0
2
0
0
0
14
Tectona Grandis
Teak
19
5
3
1
1
0
15
Others
kaaker / kikar
6
0
0
0
0
0
16
Cassia Fistula
amltash
4
1
0
0
0
0
17
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
2
0
1
0
0
0
Total
135
23
15
3
3
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
179
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Working Plan suggests this block of forest area as Soil and Moisture Conservation.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Area is moderately vulnerable to soil erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Jackal,Nilgai, Hyaena, Wild Boar, etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Pratapgarh
Aamli kheda
3.468
59
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
CA NFL SCHEME
2
Land Suitability Certificatce DFL
3
Land Suitability Certificatce NFL
4
NPV
5
recommended latter
6
site inspection report
7
DFL Maps
8
EDS 22-11-2022
9
CA NFL ESTIMATES
10
brief of CA
11
Tree LIST
12
Notification Forest block
13
Estimtes DFL
14
CA scheme DFL
15
NFL Maps
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Pratapgarh
411736
161690.595
135.8204
34
294.3936
21/07/2022
228.9516
65.472
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Pratapgarh Territorial
Udaipur
DFO
Yes
One
12/07/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Pratapgarh Territorial
Udaipur
DFO
Recommended
To connect this Pratapgarh district to Udaipur, this is major road. Due to very small width, a lot of accidents happen in this around 2.89 km patch. And public at large feels angry towards forest department. along with it, this road existed for long time and there is no rare threatened endangered wild life species are found. For public interest and to maintain department image in public hence govt interest, I recommend this diversion proposal.
Udaipur
CF
Recommended
The proposal may be accepted in the public interest
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
proposal of public utility
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Rajasthan
State Secretary
Recommended
01/05/2023
recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Jaipur
Regional Office
8B/RAJ015/2023-JPR
11/05/2023
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/RJ/ROAD/143853/2021
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×