PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : RJ-062/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Rajasthan
 (i) State / Union Territory : Rajasthan  (ii) District : Pratapgarh  (iii) Forest Division : Pratapgarh Territorial  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 4.62  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Pratapgarh Territorial4.62Protected Forest
Total 4.62
Division 1. : Pratapgarh Territorial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Pratapgarh4.62
Total4.62
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
14.620.2Eco 3
Total. 4.62


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Tectona Grandissagvan012100
2Butea Monospermaplash143101
3OthersBabul000001
4Otherskranj013000
5EucalyptusSfeda000010
Total 1 68 21 2
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 20


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Working Plan suggests this block of forest area as Soil and Moisture Conservation.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area is moderately vulnerable to soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Jackal,Nilgai, Hyaena, Wild Boar, etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1PratapgarhRajpura5301/21
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Land Suitability Certificatce NFL
2 recommended latter
3 Tree LIST
4 NPV
5 NFL Gt sheet Maps
6 NFL Digital Map
7 Notification Forest block
8 CA ESTIMMATION
9 CA SCHEME

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Pratapgarh411736161690.595135.820434294.393625/08/2023228.951665.472
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Pratapgarh TerritorialUdaipurDFOYesOne24/08/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Pratapgarh TerritorialUdaipurDFO Recommended this is major road connecting Suhagpura to Arnod towns . Due to very less width, a lot of accidents happen in this whole around the patch. And public at large feels angry towards forest department. along with it, this road existed for long time and there is no rare threatened endangered wild life species are found. For public interest and to maintain department image in public hence govt interest, I recommend this diversion proposal.
UdaipurCF RecommendedProposal may be accepted in public interest.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedProposal is recommended in public interest