PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
UP-0193/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Uttar Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Uttar Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Lucknow,Barabanki,Sultanpur,Azamgarh,Mau
(iii)
Forest Division :
Awadh Forest Division Lucknow,Social Forestry Division Barabanki,Social Forestry Division Sultanpur,Social Forestry Division Azamgarh,Social Forestry Division Mau
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
17.5714
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Social Forestry Division Mau
0.6162
Protected Forest
2
Social Forestry Division Barabanki
0.366
Protected Forest
3
Social Forestry Division Ghazipur
1.3691
Protected Forest
4
Social Forestry Division Sultanpur
7.0549
Reserved Forest
5
Social Forestry Division Sultanpur
4.2623
Protected Forest
6
Awadh Forest Division Lucknow
0.456
Protected Forest
7
Social Forestry Division Azamgarh
2.1
Reserved Forest
8
Social Forestry Division Azamgarh
1.3469
Protected Forest
Total
17.5714
Division 1. : Awadh Forest Division Lucknow
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Lucknow
0.456
Total
0.456
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.456
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
0.456
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area is covered under plantation working circle of the working plan
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Not present
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Area calculation sheet
2
Gajat
3
van swaroop certificate
4
Bhu-ksharan certificate
5
DM letter
6
NPV Certificate (Lucknow)
7
Standard terms, Lucknow
Division 2. : Social Forestry Division Azamgarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Azamgarh
3.4469
Total
3.4469
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.4469
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
3.4469
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Melia Azadirachta
Bakain
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
0
0
9
1
0
0
3
Pongamia Pinnata
Kanji
0
6
18
14
10
9
4
Albezzia Labbeck
Siras
0
0
7
3
0
0
5
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
0
28
36
0
0
1
6
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
18
166
68
15
26
Total
0
52
238
88
25
36
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
439
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area is covered under plantation working circle of the working plan.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable to soil erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Van Swaroop (Azamgarh)
2
Site Inspection Report (Azamgarh)
3
NPV Azamgarh
4
DGPS Map Azamgarh
Division 3. : Social Forestry Division Barabanki
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Barabanki
0.366
Total
0.366
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.366
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
0.366
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
This area is coverd under plantation working circle of the working plan.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable to soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Digital Map
2
Van Swaroop
3
PART - II Dated 25-11-2017
4
NPV
Division 4. : Social Forestry Division Ghazipur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ghazipur
1.3691
Total
1.3691
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.3691
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
1.3691
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albizia Procera
siras
0
1
2
2
1
0
2
Terminalia Arjuna
ARJUN
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
Tamarindus Indica
IMLI
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
Pongamia Pinnata
KANJI
0
3
0
0
0
0
5
Cassia Siamea
KESIYA
0
1
4
0
0
0
6
Syzigium Cumini
JAMUN
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
Dalburgia Sisoo
SHISHAM
0
14
10
5
2
0
8
Ficus Lacor
PAKAR
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
Prosophis Juliflora
VILAYATI BABUL
0
0
0
2
0
0
10
Aegle Marmelos
BEL
0
0
2
0
0
0
11
Melia Azadirachta
BAKAIN
0
1
3
3
2
0
12
Azadirachta Indica
NEEM
0
3
1
2
0
7
13
Borasis Flebilifer
TAAD
0
0
1
5
0
0
14
Morus Laevigata
SHAHTUT
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Spondias Axillaris Roxb
AMDA
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
Holoptelia integrifolia
CHILBIL
0
14
12
3
4
4
17
Misc. Species
SUBABOOL (Leuceana leucocephala)
0
2
1
0
0
0
Total
0
40
37
25
9
14
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
125
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
This area is covered under plantation working circle of the working plan
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable to soil erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
MAP GHAZIPUR
2
NPV (GHAZIPUR)
3
VAN SWAROOP (GHAZIPUR)
Division 5. : Social Forestry Division Mau
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mau
0.6162
Total
0.6162
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.6162
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
0.6162
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
0
0
3
8
5
4
2
Albizzia procera
siras
0
0
0
1
0
2
Total
0
0
3
9
5
6
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
23
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area is covered under plantation working circle of the working plan
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerability to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NILL
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Digital Map
2
Van Swaroop
3
NPV
Division 6. : Social Forestry Division Sultanpur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Sultanpur
11.3172
Total
11.3172
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
11.3172
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
11.3172
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
sagaoun
0
489
1
0
0
0
2
Ficus Religiosa
pipal
0
0
3
1
2
5
3
Madhuca indica
mahua
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
0
38
8
1
0
2
5
Ficus Bengalensis
Bargad
0
0
0
0
1
1
6
Mangifera Indica
Aam
0
2
1
2
3
5
7
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
0
26
2
1
2
6
8
Acacia Nilotica
Babul
0
3
6
6
1
0
9
Prosophis Juliflora
Vilayti Babul
0
0
1
1
0
0
10
Pongamia Pinnata
Kanji
0
5
0
3
1
1
11
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
15
25
12
3
1
12
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
0
0
0
0
2
13
Holoptolia Integrifolia
Chilbil
0
13
8
2
1
0
14
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
1
0
0
0
3
15
Albizia Procera
Siras
0
12
1
0
0
0
16
Ailanthus excelsa
Arru
0
2
5
11
3
0
17
Ficus Lacor
Pakar
0
1
0
0
0
0
18
Cassia Fistula
Amaltaas
0
0
0
0
1
1
19
Delonix Regia
Goldmohar
0
2
0
0
0
0
20
Misc. Species
kadsagoun, baitun. acoher, jungel jlabee, gutail , Akohar
0
4040
1
2
0
0
21
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
50
0
0
0
0
Total
0
4699
62
42
18
31
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
4852
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
This area is coverd under plantation working circle of the working plan
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulneeratable to soil erosin
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NO
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Sultanpur
Fatehpur
7.2754
337,339,337g,774,775,779,809,810k,812,813,815k,815kh,814,857,858,862
2
Azamgarh
Sehda
2.129
889,890,919,920,922,924,925,926,927,928,929,930,933,936,937
3
Mirzapur
Matwar
10.092
774kh
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV ki gadna
2
site inpection report
3
centuri report
4
van sararoop
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Lucknow
252800
10327.12
252.6415
88
119.69
30/09/2017
114.42
5.27
2
Barabanki
389150
5505.925
200.2852664
44
393.0235328
25/11/2017
321.463734
0.00
3
Sultanpur
267289
636.878
59.2822
4
118.5644
10/11/2017
292.583
0
4
Azamgarh
423400
110.399
1.862
3
29.7
26/11/2017
23
0
5
Mau
171300
519.07
16.488
8
4.61
07/11/2017
4.61
17.11
6
Ghazipur
337700
121
70.498
10
7.336
24/11/2017
0
6.916
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Social Forestry Division Mau
Azamgarh Circle Azamgarh
DFO
Yes
One
26/09/2017
Social Forestry Division Ghazipur
Varanasi Circle Varanasi
DFO
Yes
One
12/10/2017
Awadh Forest Division Lucknow
Lucknow Circle Lucknow
DFO
Yes
One
11/10/2017
Social Forestry Division Azamgarh
Azamgarh Circle Azamgarh
DFO
Yes
One
23/09/2017
Social Forestry Division Sultanpur
Saryu Circle Faizabad
DFO
Yes
One
05/10/2017
Lucknow Circle Lucknow
CF
No
No Data
Social Forestry Division Barabanki
Saryu Circle Faizabad
DFO
Yes
One
23/09/2017
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
Varanasi Circle Varanasi
CF
Yes
One
09-11-2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Social Forestry Division Barabanki
Saryu Circle Faizabad
DFO
Recommended
Recommended
Social Forestry Division Ghazipur
Varanasi Circle Varanasi
DFO
Recommended
minimum protected forest area is being utilized hence recommended in the public interest.
Awadh Forest Division Lucknow
Lucknow Circle Lucknow
DFO
Recommended
Social Forestry Division Mau
Azamgarh Circle Azamgarh
DFO
Recommended
Social Forestry Division Azamgarh
Azamgarh Circle Azamgarh
DFO
Recommended
important infrastructure project will provide ease of transport and reduce congestion, helpful in reducing pollution. forest area to be diverted is very less in azamgarh division is not habitat of important fauna or endangered flora.
Social Forestry Division Sultanpur
Saryu Circle Faizabad
DFO
Recommended
Recommended
Saryu Circle Faizabad
CF
Recommended
Yes
Varanasi Circle Varanasi
CF
Recommended
This project is benificial for public of India hence Recommendation.
Yes
Lucknow Circle Lucknow
CF
Recommended
For Public Welfare
Yes
Azamgarh Circle Azamgarh
CF
Recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended for Approval.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Uttar Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
03/01/2018
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Lucknow
Regional Office
8B/UP/06/37/2017/FC
09/03/2018
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/28804/2017
ROAD288042017206
25,637,041.00
25,637,041.00
18/04/2018
258
Corporation Bank
Corporation Bank (Challan)
02/04/2018
02/04/2018
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/28804/2017
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×