PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
UP-017/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Uttar Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Uttar Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Kanpur Nagar
(iii)
Forest Division :
Social Forestry Division Kanpur Nagar
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
93.975
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Social Forestry Division Kanpur Nagar
93.975
Protected Forest
Total
93.975
Division 1. : Social Forestry Division Kanpur Nagar
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Kanpur Nagar
93.975
Total
93.975
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
93.975
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
93.975
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Mangifera Indica
aam
0
2
9
12
5
28
2
embelica officinalis
aawla
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
Acacia Ariciloformis
Acacia
0
2
1
0
0
0
4
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
Psidium Guajava
Amarud
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
1
11
30
45
37
27
7
Ailanthus excelsa
Aru
0
2
7
15
14
20
8
Saraca Asoca
Ashok
5
7
11
2
0
0
9
Acacia Nilotica
Babool
0
3
8
13
8
6
10
Zizyphus Jujuba
Baer
0
5
11
5
0
0
11
Terminalia Bellarica
Baheda
0
0
0
2
0
0
12
Melia Azadirachta
Bakayan
0
3
4
7
2
0
13
Kiggelia Pinnata
Balam Kheera
0
0
2
2
1
0
14
Ficus benghalensis
Bargad
0
1
3
5
7
15
15
Aegle Marmelos
Beal
0
1
10
2
1
0
16
Others
Bottle Brush
0
1
4
0
0
0
17
Cassia Fistula
Cassia
0
1
4
3
2
1
18
Holoptelia integrifolia
Chilbil
0
105
178
232
177
99
19
Alstonia Scholaris
Chitavan
0
5
22
12
4
1
20
Butea Monosperma
Dhak
0
0
1
1
0
0
21
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
0
33
201
302
264
265
22
Ficus Racemosa
Gular
0
11
19
17
11
15
23
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
0
14
30
33
6
3
24
Tamarindus Indica
Imli
0
43
12
1
0
5
25
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
18
18
20
32
106
26
Prosophis Juliflora
Juliflora
0
0
1
0
0
0
27
Others
Kadamba
0
3
9
7
5
0
28
Others
Kaitha
0
0
0
0
0
4
29
Kunkudu
Kankudiya
0
0
1
1
0
0
30
Pongamia Pinnata
Kanji
0
122
70
34
13
16
31
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Katahal
0
1
0
2
0
0
32
Others
Khjoor
0
0
0
3
0
0
33
Others
Labheda/lisoda
0
3
4
1
2
1
34
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
1
0
3
3
7
35
Bamboo
Neem
6
241
222
120
68
47
36
Ficus Infectoria
Pakad
1
7
10
8
15
19
37
Peltoform Pterocarpum
palto farm
0
0
0
1
0
0
38
Ficus Religiosa
Peepal
0
21
29
23
32
47
39
Others
Phaikas binjayina
0
1
4
0
0
0
40
Populus spp
poplar
0
0
0
0
1
0
41
Prosophis Spicigera
prosppis
0
10
48
40
14
6
42
Ficus Lacor
Rubber
0
0
0
0
0
1
43
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
0
1
6
8
0
0
44
Moringa oleifera
Sahjan
0
0
1
0
1
2
45
Morus Laevigata
Sehtoot
0
6
10
5
0
1
46
Bombax Ceiba
Semal
0
3
8
10
6
4
47
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
4
143
124
57
41
45
48
Albezzia Labbeck
Siras
0
41
62
31
16
6
49
Others
Soriya
0
0
1
0
0
0
50
Others
Su babool
0
19
12
4
1
0
51
Borasis Flebilifer
Tar
0
0
0
1
5
1
52
Acacia leucophloea
riya
0
0
2
0
0
0
53
Others
Jangal Jalebi
0
5
2
3
0
3
Total
17
900
1212
1093
794
801
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
4817
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed land is included in strip plantation working circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable for soil erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
no
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
43194781.00
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
20.0
RF
Lakhna
0
View file
2
2
20.0
RF
Lakhna
0
View file
3
3
20.0
RF
Lakhna
0
View file
4
4
12.95
RF
Chakarnagar
0
View file
5
5
20.0
RF
Chakarnagar
0
View file
6
6
20.0
RF
Chakarnagar
0
View file
7
7
20.0
RF
Bharthana
0
View file
8
8
20.0
RF
Itawah
0
View file
9
9
20.0
RF
Itawah
0
View file
10
10
15.0
RF
Basrehar
0
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Century Certificate Kanpur Nagar
2
Site Inspection Certificate Kanpur nagar
3
Brief Summary of the Project Road
4
Land Suitability Certificate Kanpur Nagar
5
NPV Calculation Certificate Kanpur Nagar
6
Van Swaroop Certificate Kanpur Nagar
7
Joint Inspection Certificate Kanpur Nagar
8
Recommondation Certificate Kanpur Nagar
9
Re Check Compensative Report Etawah
10
Tree Calculation Point 1 & 2
11
Revise FRA Certificate and Area Calculation Report Kanpur Nagar
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Kanpur Nagar
315500
5398.255
222.504
32
8.5
16/02/2018
53.82
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Social Forestry Division Kanpur Nagar
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
DFO
Yes
One
06/02/2018
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
CF
Yes
One
17/02/2018
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Social Forestry Division Kanpur Nagar
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
DFO
Recommended
The widening of existing carriageway is the only feasible option as the technical aspect are concerned which requires the minimum land.
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
CF
Recommended
The widening of existing carriageway is the only feasible option as the technical aspect are concerned which requires the minimum land.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended for approval.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Uttar Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
05/03/2018
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Lucknow
Regional Office
8B/UP/06/24/2018/FC
06/07/2018
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/26890/2017
ROAD268902017368
118,656,706.00
118,656,706.00
30/07/2018
CNRBR52018073000648084
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
23/07/2018
24/07/2018
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/26890/2017
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×