View Form A Part II

PART-II

(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)

State Serial No. of proposal : UP-09/2017

1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttar Pradesh

(i) State / Union Territory : Uttar Pradesh (ii) District : Kannauj (iii) Forest Division : Kannauj (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 21.6 (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road

2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion

S. No.	Division	Forest Land(ha.)	Legal Status
1	Kannauj	21.6	Protected Forest
Total		21.6

Division 1. : Kannauj

3. District wise area to be diverted in the division

S. No.	District	Area(ha.)
1	Kannauj	21.6
Total		21.6

4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion

(i) Density of vegetation

S. No.	Area(in ha.)	Density	Eco-Class
1	21.6	0.4	Eco 3
Total.	21.6

(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL

S. No.	Scientific Name	Local Name	(0-30)cm.	(31-60)cm.	(61-90)cm.	(91-120)cm.	(121-150)cm.	(>150)cm.
1	Eucalyptus	Eucalyptus	0	3	27	145	186	114
2	Ficus Lacor	Pakar	0	6	5	9	8	3
3	Syzigium Cumini	Jamun	0	11	9	9	19	7
4	Azadirachta Indica	Neem	0	62	69	4	24	17
5	Delonix Regia	Goldmohar	0	1	6	4	5	0
6	Melia Azadirachta	Bakain Neem	0	0	6	2	0	0
7	Mangifera Indica	Aam	0	1	3	1	2	6
8	Ficus Bengalensis	Bargad	0	2	2	2	1	10
9	Prosophis Juliflora	Bilayati Babool	0	3	25	20	13	1
10	C.Siamia	Kesia Semia	0	1	5	15	10	0
11	Others	Gular	0	0	1	4	3	3
12	Dalburgia Sisoo	Sheesham	0	74	23	18	22	23
13	Albezzia Amara	Siras	0	0	3	7	5	0
14	Ficus Religiosa	pipal	0	1	3	4	3	4
15	Pongamia Pinnata	Kanji	0	15	2	2	0	0
16	Acacia Nilotica	Deshi Babool	0	3	8	13	7	1
17	Terminalia Arjuna	Arjun	0	6	113	128	55	4
18	Alstonia Scholaris	Chitvan	0	21	21	12	0	0
19	Holoptolia Integrifolia	Papri	0	1	10	8	6	3
20	Others	Beri	0	3	0	2	0	0
21	Tectona Grandis	Sagaun	0	3	0	0	0	0
22	Kiggelia Pinnata	Show Babool	0	0	2	0	0	0
23	Others	Aru	0	0	10	3	2	0
24	Others	Balam Khira	0	5	0	0	0	0
Total			0	222	353	412	371	196
Sub Total (No of Trees.)			1554

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Area is Covered Under Plantation Working Circle of the Working Plan

6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area is not vulnerable to soil erosion

7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0

8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view

(i).

Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No Wildlife Present

(ii).

Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No

(iii).

Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No

(iv).

Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No

(v).

Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No

9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any

(i).

Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No

10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion

(i).

Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes

11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed

(i).

Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No

12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL

13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)

(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 848.5

Patch Wise Details
S.no	Patch No.	Area(ha.)	Name of PF/RF	Range	Compartment No	Uploaded KML file of patch
1	1	5.7	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Adampur Makhan1	View file
2	2	4.3	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Adampur Makhan2	View file
3	3	10.1	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Kansua1	View file
4	4	23.7	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Kansua2	View file
5	5	2.4	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Gopalpur	View file
6	6	4.1	RF	Kannauj	F_Block Gopalpur	View file

(ii). Copy of CA scheme details:

(iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:

(iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:

(V).

Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details

S. No.	Documents	Remarks
1		Vanswroop Chinnihit Certificate
2		FRA Certificate
3		Net Present Value(NPV)

14. District Profile

S.no	District Name	Geographical area of the district (in ha.)	Forest area of the district (in ha.)	Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)	No. of Approved Cases	Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)	Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)	A) Forest land (in ha.)	B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1	Kannauj	212923	4853.246	129.004	12	42.5	30/11/2016	42.5	86.594

15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land

Division Name	Circle	Site inspected By	Whether site inspected	No. of times site visited	Site inspection report	Date of visit
Kannauj	Kanpur Circle Kanpur	DFO	Yes	One		20/12/2016
	Kanpur Circle Kanpur	CF	No		No Data
		Nodal Officer	No		No Data

(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))

16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason

Division	Circle	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Reason	Whether CF agreed
Kannauj	Kanpur Circle Kanpur	DFO	Recommended	Proposal is Recommanded in Public Interest
	Kanpur Circle Kanpur	CF	Recommended	recommend	Yes
		Nodal Officer	Recommended	Recommended for approval. quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff

Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)

17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)

State	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Recommendation Date	Remarks	Signing Authority	Notification	Recommendation Letter
Uttar Pradesh	State Secretary	Recommended	16/03/2017		State Govt. Officer	No Data

17. Stage-I Clearance Report

Regional Office	Recommendation By	MoEF File No.	Date of Stage-I Clearance	Clearance Letter
Lucknow	Regional Office	8B/UP/06/22/2017/FC	02/01/2018

18. Payment made by User Agency

Proposal No.	Application No.	Total Amount (Rs.)	Recieved Amount (Rs.)	Transaction Date	Transaction ID	Bank Name	Mode of Payment	Demmand Generated By User Agency	Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer	Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/22835/2016	ROAD228352016875	28,051,500.00	28,051,500.00	21/03/2018	SBIN318080045125	Corporation Bank	NEFT/RTGS (Challan)	08/03/2018	09/03/2018

23. Stage-II Clearance Details

Proposal No.	Date of Stage-II Clearance	Proposal Status	Clearance Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/22835/2016		Approved In-Principle	No Data