PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UP-014/2023
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttar Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttar Pradesh  (ii) District : Bijnor  (iii) Forest Division : Social Forestry Division Bijnor,Forest Division Nazibabad  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.27  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Forest Division Nazibabad4.61Reserved Forest
2Social Forestry Division Bijnor0.66Protected Forest
Total 5.27
Division 1. : Forest Division Nazibabad
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Bijnor4.61
Total4.61
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
14.610.4Eco 3
Total. 4.61


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Tectona GrandisSagwan65218258116338
2Cassia FistulaAmaltas31715712
3EucalyptusLyptus03141076
4Butea MonospermaDhak000003
5Aegle MarmelosBel020010
6Terminalia BellaricaBheda000004
7Holoptelia integrifoliaKanju021011
8Bombax CeibaSemal0000011
9Aegle MarmelosJeegan000011
10Zizyphus JujubaBeri100000
11Acacia CatechuKhair05131323
12Dalburgia SisooShisham013610
13Albezzia LabbeckSiras000040
14Ailanthus excelsaElaanthas00011217
15Tectona GrandisKat Sagaun12316400
16OthersGutel000001
17OthersKokat42618111015
18OthersRohini3617545167
Total 88 366403 21389 79
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 1238


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Working plan of Division was effective from 2019-20 to 2024-25. working plan is being prepared. The forest area proposed for diversion comes under Eucalyptus working circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Forest Area is vulnerable to water erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : forest land proposed for diversion is part of notified Elephant Reserve. Leopard ,Sambhar,Neelgai,Cheetal,Jackals wild boar ,sloth bear,barasingha etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The forest area is part of RAWASAN -SONANADI RAJAJI CORBETT ELEPHANT CORRIDOR . THE PROJECT is most likely to imapct the movement of elephants and other wildlife and may increase the human wildlife conflict cases with respect to elephants and leopards mainly
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The forest area is part of RAWASAN -SONANADI RAJAJI CORBETT ELEPHANT CORRIDOR . Hence the project is likely to impact the movement of elephants and other wildlife .It may also increase the human wildlife conflict cases such as elephants and leopards which is already high .
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1BijnorSabalgarh5.271215
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 List of Trees with scientific Name
2 Undertaking FRA-2006.
3 EDS Nodal Officer
4 undertaken for no wildlife AREA
5 covering letter
6 Certicate of DFO & SDM for the proposed land for NFL
7 DSS analysis certificate
8 work plan copy work plan certificate
9 Certificate for Wildlife Sanctuary within 10 Kms.
10 Cross section plan of project.
11 Certificate of DFO for Non-Violation of Forsest Act
12 undertaking to Aadhare standard standard conditions stipulated by forest department .pdf
13 Certificate regarding suitability of the site selected for compensatory afforestation FCA.pdf
14 Calculation of NPV
15 Undertaking/ Certificate
16 EDS reply (1).pdf
17 DFO Recommendation Certificate
18 Certificate of minimum forest land
19 part 2 ki PDF single file (1).pdf
20 EDS raised by Nodal Officer on the proposal has been removed
21 Combined Inspection Report DFO & User Agency
22 gudget notification.pdf
23 proposal pdf
24 PSC Committee has recommended the proposal on dt.09.01.2025 accordingly User Agency vide letter no.17296 dt. 10.01.2025 has submitted the compliance of EDS raised by State Government
Division 2. : Social Forestry Division Bijnor
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Bijnor0.66
Total0.66
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.660.1Eco 3
Total. 0.66


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Madhuca indicaMahuvva000001
2Couroupita GuianensisKokat5145515
3Tectona Grandissagaun0152110
4Cassia FistulaAmaltas152200
5Butea MonospermaDhak010000
6Acacia CatechuKhar001100
7Bombox CeibaSemal001000
8Ficus ReligiosaPeepal000001
9Holoptelia integrifoliaPapri010000
10Terminalia ArjunaArjun010000
11Melotus PhilippensisRohni51210310
12Otherskatsagaun882000
Total 19 5723 123 7
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 121


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The Area is Covered Under Plantation Working circle of Working Plan.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Forest area is not vulnerable to erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1BijnorSabalgarh5.271215
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Revised Calculation NPV.
2 Single PDF file.
3 EDS reply letter with area calculation
4 Working Plan Copy.
5 Vaikalpic Bhoomi. certificate.
6 Area calculation.
7 Detail note of project.
8 DFO forwarding letter.
9 EDS reply letter query by dfo to ua kml related.
10 EDS reply letter with Road gazzat letter.
11 Joint inspection report.
12 Justification.
13 Eds reply letter with gazzat letter.
14 Eds reply letter.
15 Muck manegement plan.
16 Nodal related letter to ETP.
17 Certificate of minimum use of forest land.
18 Eds reply letter.
19 For no other feasible alternative of alignment and diversion of barest minimum forest land
20 For no other feasible alternative of alignment and diversion of barest minimum forest land
21 Joint inspection report.
22 Justification.
23 Sp[ecific condition of road project.
24 Undertaking for 10km radius.
25 Undertaking for no muck generation and disposal
26 Undertaking for No wildlife area
27 Undertaking for No wildlife area
28 Cross section plan of project.
29 Tree list.
30 Undertaking for non started of any activity without sanction from competent authority
31 Undertaking for payment of additional net present value of forest area
32 Undertaking for PWD,Irrigation,Railway department NOC
33 Undertaking FRA-2006.
34 Undertaking to adhere standard condition stipulated by forest department
35 recommendation Letter

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Bijnor456100047815.69124.548880001/09/2024382.920
2Bijnor5489840490043.2591043.25912/07/202443.8240
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Social Forestry Division BijnorMoradabad Circle MoradabadDFOYesOne24/08/2024
Forest Division NazibabadMoradabad Circle MoradabadDFOYesOne26/09/2024
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Forest Division NazibabadMoradabad Circle MoradabadDFO RecommendedOn inspection of the site, it was found that 5.27 Ha. land is required by the user agency out of which 4.61 hectares of reserved forest under the jurisdiction of Bijnor Forest Division Najibabad and 0.66 hectare of protected Forest under the jurisdiction of Socical Forest Division Bijnor.
Social Forestry Division BijnorMoradabad Circle MoradabadDFO Recommended The requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project
Moradabad Circle MoradabadCF RecommendedI Agree with the recommendation of DFO. Najibabad and Bijnor.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended for Approval.