PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
UP-029/2015
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Uttar Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Uttar Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Etawah
(iii)
Forest Division :
Social Forestry Division Etawah
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
7.7285
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Social Forestry Division Etawah
3.5847
Reserved Forest
2
Social Forestry Division Etawah
4.1438
Protected Forest
Total
7.7285
Division 1. : Social Forestry Division Etawah
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Etawah
7.7285
Total
7.7285
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
28942.14
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
28942.14
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Ficus Religiosa
pipal
0
0
1
0
1
6
2
Holoptelia integrifolia
papadi
0
7
5
11
5
7
3
Alstonia Scholaris
chhitvan
0
91
66
21
3
0
4
Dalburgia Sisoo
shisham
0
26
17
10
5
22
5
Cassia Siamea
cassia
0
20
48
31
6
2
6
Pongamia Pinnata
kannji
0
16
11
2
1
0
7
Syzigium Cumini
jamun
0
1
4
0
2
7
8
Ailanthus excelsa
arru
0
1
0
0
2
2
9
Tamarindus Indica
emali
0
0
0
0
0
1
10
Azadirachta Indica
neem
0
10
15
12
12
16
11
Prosophis Juliflora
vilayati babul
0
28
22
7
4
2
12
Melia Azadirachta
bakayan
0
7
3
4
5
7
13
Ficus Infectoria
pakar
0
19
12
3
1
1
14
Delonix Regia
gold mohar
0
0
5
14
9
0
15
Polyainthia Longifolia
ashok
0
11
4
1
0
0
16
Santalum Album
chandan
0
0
1
0
0
0
17
Mangifera Indica
aam
0
2
0
0
0
1
18
Cassia Fistula
amaltash
0
3
2
4
1
0
19
Terminalia Arjuna
arjun
0
0
1
0
1
0
20
Teak
sagaun
0
3
1
0
0
0
21
Sepandus Emerginatus
reetha
0
1
2
0
0
0
22
Anthocephalus Cadamba
cadamba
0
0
4
2
1
1
23
Albizia Procera
siras
0
5
1
3
0
0
24
Morus Laevigata
shahtoot
0
3
4
0
0
0
25
Calistemon Lanceolatus
botal brash
0
2
0
0
0
0
26
Acacia Nilotica
desi babool
0
2
1
1
0
1
27
Bombax Ceiba
semal
0
0
1
1
0
0
28
Dalbergia Latifolia
kala sisham
0
0
0
3
3
1
29
Ficus Bengalensis
bargad
0
0
1
0
0
0
30
Prasophis sinereria
parking soniya
0
2
0
0
0
0
31
Aegle Marmelos
bel
0
1
0
1
0
0
32
Zizyphus Jujuba
ber
0
7
17
7
0
1
33
Leucosceptrum Canum Sm.
su-babool
0
7
10
1
1
0
34
Ficus Lacor
goolar
0
0
3
1
1
1
35
Cedrela Febrifuga Blume
labhera
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
Teak
cut sagaun
0
1
2
0
0
0
37
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
0
22
4
0
0
0
Total
0
299
269
140
64
79
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
851
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Forest Block Plantation working circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
road are not subjected to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
no wildlife near proposed land
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Etawah
Prithvipur Bhaunakpur
3.5847
2009
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Remark abaut trees
2
Tree enumeration list
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Etawah
436491
28942.14
254.6331
33
43.08
31/12/2014
43.08
18.0937
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
CF
No
No Data
Social Forestry Division Etawah
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
DFO
Yes
One
17/03/2015
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Social Forestry Division Etawah
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
DFO
Recommended
No other route is available for widening of NH-92
Kanpur Circle Kanpur
CF
Recommended
recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Proposal is recommended for approval in public interest.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Uttar Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
30/04/2015
Approval for recommendation
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Lucknow
Regional Office
8B/UP/06/12/2015
15/06/2015
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/UP/ROAD/10971/2015
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×