PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UP-050/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttar Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttar Pradesh  (ii) District : Maharajganj  (iii) Forest Division : Sohagibarwa Wild Life Division, Maharajganj  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.4  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Canal
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Sohagibarwa Wild Life Division, Maharajganj0.4Reserved Forest
Total 0.4
Division 1. : Sohagibarwa Wild Life Division, Maharajganj
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Maharajganj0.4
Total0.4
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.40.5Eco 3
Total. 0.4


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Tectona GrandisSagwan015100
2Dalburgia SisooShisam068510
3Terminalia ArjunaArjun001720
4Lagerstroemia ParvifloraGulchman000010
5Acacia NiloticaBabul000100
6Acacia AriciloformisAcacia000100
Total 0 714 154 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 40


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The Area is Covered under plantation working circle of working plan.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Forest Land Proposed for Diversion is Forest Road and Both Side Surrounded by Agriculture Land, So area is not vulnerable to soil erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Panthera Pardus, Canis Aureus, Sus Scrofa, Axis axis, Macaca mulatta Etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Since the proposed project area is falling out side the wildlife sanctuary hence there will be no impacte of the project with in sanctuary. The proposed area is falling within eco sensitive zone.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Forest Land Proposed for Diversion is Forest Road which covered 0.4 ha area and this proposed forest land for diversion is Surrounded by Agriculture Land on both sides. So due to this project least possibility of harm to wildlife and its parts.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : Yes
 (i). Details and comments on the impact of Project on such sites/establishments : The Trombay line is very near to the site. Trombay line is in dilapidated condition as well as non functional. the trombay line needs to be removed for the completion of canal. if trombay line has to be operated in future, a bridge may need to be built, on which trombay line has to be laid
 (ii). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1.31341
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
110.4PachpedwaBhambhar0    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 वचन बद्वता प्रमाण-पत्र
2 स्थल संयुक्त निरीक्षण रिपोर्ट
3 Bio-Divverity impact assessment report
4 वृक्षों की सूची
5 FRA Under taking
6 वांछित प्रमाण-पत्र
7 उप जिलाधिकारी का प्रमाण-पत्र

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Maharajganj2952004610010.146024/09/202000
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Sohagibarwa Wild Life Division, MaharajganjWild life Circle Eestern RegionDFOYesOne13/03/2020
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Sohagibarwa Wild Life Division, MaharajganjWild life Circle Eestern RegionDFO Recommendedenclose as annexed
Wild life Circle Eestern RegionCF RecommendedThe project is recommended for approval with standard conditions and mitigation measures and also subject to provision of 5% of the project cost passing through the forests for undertaking mitigation measures of the project.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended for Approval.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Uttar PradeshState SecretaryRecommended12/11/2020Recommended for Approval. State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
LucknowRegional Office8B/UP/02/166/202015/01/2021
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/UP/Canal/44512/2020CANAL44512202067019,164,517.0019,164,517.002021-06-18RBI1702135662581Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2021-04-102021-04-20
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/UP/Canal/44512/2020Approved In-PrincipleNo Data