PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
UK-0253/2015
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Uttarakhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Uttarakhand
(ii)
District :
Uttarkashi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.224
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
0.224
Protected Forest
Total
0.224
Division 1. : Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Uttarkashi
0.224
Total
0.224
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.224
0.15
Eco 5
Total.
0.224
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Pinus roxburghii
Chir
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
Alnus Nepalensis
Utis
0
0
0
0
1
0
Total
0
0
0
2
3
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
5
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
protection
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
as per geologist report
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
.05
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
local fauna only
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This being only a bridge across the river, there is no impact on flora and fauna, rather would help in better patrolling and conservation of forests and wildlife
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This being only a bridge across the river, there is no impact on flora and fauna, rather would help in better patrolling and conservation of forests and wildlife
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
2.98144
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
0.224
PF
Rupin
Doni 1, Hadwari 3
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Gio reference map
2
Tree list
3
digitalmap1
4
Bar chart
5
Digital map
6
part-1 in sign.
7
actualcuttreelist
8
landschedule
9
mukdisposal
10
CMghosnalater
11
user agency eds latter
12
DFO site Inspection report
13
NPV calculation report
14
36 meeting report
15
224 tree estimate report
16
PWD EDS clarification latter
17
Recommendation latter
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Uttarkashi
695783.35
801600
150.620
101
270.255
15/10/2020
190.35
34.27
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rajaji National Park
CF
No
One
No Data
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
Rajaji National Park
DFO
Yes
One
15/10/2020
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
Rajaji National Park
DFO
Recommended
as per file attached
Rajaji National Park
CF
Recommended
useful for wildlife patrolling and connectivity of villages
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
As per file attached
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Uttarakhand
State Secretary
Recommended
12/01/2016
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Dehradun
Regional Office
8B/UCP/09/65/2016/FC
07/12/2021
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/UK/Others/9741/2015
OTHERS97412015038
918,620.00
918,620.00
2022-11-25
801218
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2022-11-18
2022-11-18
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/UK/Others/9741/2015
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×