PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : UK-021/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Uttarakhand
 (i) State / Union Territory : Uttarakhand  (ii) District : Nainital  (iii) Forest Division : Tarai West,Ramnagar  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 181  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Mining
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Tarai West,Ramnagar181Reserved Forest
Total 181
Division 1. : Tarai West,Ramnagar
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Nainital181
Total181
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11810.4Eco 1
Total. 181


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : protected working circle, working plan of terai west forest division 2015-16 to 2024-25
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : this land transfer is for mining of river bed material, which will prevent river to scour forest land on its bank.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : wild boar, blue cow, jackel,Monkey,deer.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 land schedule
2 not required
3 geological scientist report
4 google map of site
5 CA Not Required as it is mining lease reneuwal proposal, have no trees affected.
6 proposal length and breadth
7
8 Geo reference map of site
9 No trees are affected

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Nainital42510056400109.70930167.2123/02/2022167.210
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Tarai West,RamnagarWesternDFOYesOne23/02/2022
 WesternCFYesOne25/02/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Tarai West,RamnagarWesternDFO Recommendedits will be benificial to state government as it will generate reveneu and also prevent scouring of river bank
WesternCF RecommendedAs Proposed by DFO.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedAs per file attached
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
UttarakhandState SecretaryRecommended12/04/2022as per file attached State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
DehradunHead Office8-61/1999-FC pt. VI01/03/2023
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/UK/MIN/147885/2021Approved In-PrincipleNo Data