PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
UK-059/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Uttarakhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Uttarakhand
(ii)
District :
Uttarkashi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola,Tons,Purola
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
24.317
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Hydel
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
22.067
Civil Soyam land
2
Tons,Purola
2.25
Reserved Forest
Total
24.317
Division 1. : Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Uttarkashi
22.067
Total
22.067
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
22.067
0.1
Eco 5
Total.
22.067
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Alnus Nepalensis
Utis
133
123
16
1
0
0
2
Others
Kapasi
41
23
0
1
0
0
3
Others
Titari
37
22
2
0
0
0
4
Pinus wallichiana
Kail
37
27
3
0
0
0
5
Others
Kathbhoj
2
4
1
0
0
0
6
Others
Panger
14
9
1
7
0
0
7
Others
Ban Pipal
2
0
0
0
0
0
8
Ulmus wallichiana
Himri
88
41
3
1
0
0
9
Rhododendron arboreum
Buransh
62
60
10
0
0
0
10
Others
Kumloch
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
Others
Narikha
17
11
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Kharik
21
15
1
0
0
0
13
Pyrus pashia
Mehal
37
27
6
3
0
0
14
Juglans regia
Akharot
6
4
5
1
0
0
15
Quercus leucotricophora
Banj
20
27
16
6
0
0
16
carpinus viminea
Chankharik
11
8
2
0
0
0
17
Others
Darli
43
30
4
0
0
0
18
Rhus parviflora
Tung
3
1
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Siris
13
5
0
0
0
0
20
Others
Kimu
30
33
12
4
0
0
21
Others
Ayar
37
41
7
2
0
0
22
Others
Arkhol
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
Others
Chullu
8
10
5
1
0
0
24
Castanopsis Tribuloides
Katavg
3
2
0
0
0
0
25
Others
Kathmari
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
Others
Pyrus
1
0
0
0
0
0
27
Cotoneaster bacillaris
Ruyis
1
0
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Surayi
13
7
1
0
0
0
29
Quercus floribunda
Moru
0
14
4
3
0
0
30
Emblica Officianalis
Kawala
7
0
0
0
0
0
31
Ficus palmata
Bedu
2
0
0
0
0
0
32
Others
Mader
1
0
0
0
0
0
33
Others
Lodhar
91
41
0
0
0
0
34
Pinus roxburghii
Chir
16
16
0
0
0
0
Total
799
602
99
30
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1530
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Civil Soyam land
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable and also during the construction of the project there is no possibility of erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
1.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
1.NEMORHACDUS GORAL 2.MUNTIACUS MUNTJAK 3. CANIS AUREUS INDICUS (HODGLON) 4. MACACA MULATA 5. PRESBYTIS ANLELLUS (DUFRENSE)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The project is situated in Govind wild life santuary & national park and is a run of the river scheme. The project is 100 meter away from notified area of govind wild life santuary & wild life clearance has been accorded fro NBWL
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
Project is located 100meters away from notified area of Govind Wild Life Sanctuary and National Park. Wildlife Clearance has been accorded
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Project is located 100meters away from notified area of Govind Wild Life Sanctuary and National Park. Wildlife Clearance has been accorded
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
185.10
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV new
2
ANNEXUREArevisedCBA point 1
3
point 3
4
DD(WL) Reply & New NPV Calculation sheets
5
Compliance latter for eds raised by Ministry
6
Compliance latter for eds quarry of nodal office
7
NPV calculations
8
EDS reply to MoEFF and revised SIR
9
Certificate for FRL - 4
10
Revised Land Schedule
11
Reply to EDS of MoEF&CC
12
Aerial distance certificate
13
Revised Site Inspection Report
14
letter regarding reply to MOEF dated 08.10.20
15
ponit 2
16
DSS Report of Forest land proposed for JSHEP point 4
17
List of trees species & dia wise
Division 2. : Tons,Purola
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Uttarkashi
2.25
Total
2.25
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.25
0
Eco 5
Total.
2.25
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
nill
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
0
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Name of working circle - Chir Working Circle. The area is not vulnerable and also during the construction of the project there is no possibility of erosion
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable and also during the construction of the project there is no possibility of erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
1.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Monkey & Red Fox
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
186.026
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
10
Bainol-2
Purola
2
View file
2
2
3
Bainol 15
Purola
15
View file
3
3
7
Bainol-16
Purola
16
View file
4
4
10
RAUN-4B
Purola
4B
View file
5
5
5
KARADA 1A
Purola
1A
View file
6
6
5
Dhamkoti
Purola
1
View file
7
7
10
THADUNG
Purola
7
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Attached Letter no-490/12-1 Dated-26-08-2019
2
3
NPV
4
Attached Letter no-2253/12-1 Dated-16.04.2019.
5
Jakhol Sankari (SIR) Report
6
jakhol dss report tons
7
Revised Land Schedule
8
Reply to EDS
9
FRL - 4 Certificate
10
District Profile
11
CA estimates nov 21
12
DSS results report for CA
13
CA suitability certificates
14
EDS reply by DFO 17.11.21
15
Toposheet CA nov 21
16
GEOREFERENCE MAP NOV21
17
8december2022
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Uttarkashi
2
Uttarkashi
844792.45
89379.7110
1525.37
500
2330.27
01/12/2018
1768.23
213.17
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
Rajaji National Park
DFO
Yes
One
21/06/2018
Yamuna
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
Tons,Purola
Yamuna
DFO
Yes
One
07/08/2019
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Tons,Purola
Yamuna
DFO
Recommended
Recommended for section
Govind Pashu Vihar,Purola
Rajaji National Park
DFO
Recommended
Recommended for section
Yamuna
CF
Recommended
Proposal is recommended.
Yes
Rajaji National Park
CF
Recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
As per file attached
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Uttarakhand
State Secretary
Recommended
05/11/2018
as per file attached
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Dehradun
Regional Office
8B/UCP/01/146/2018
27/07/2023
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/UK/HYD/22889/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×