PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
TR-023/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Tripura
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Tripura
(ii)
District :
Sepahijala
(iii)
Forest Division :
Sepahijala District Forest
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1.42
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Mining
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Sepahijala District Forest
1.42
Reserved Forest
Total
1.42
Division 1. : Sepahijala District Forest
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Sepahijala
1.42
Total
1.42
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.42
0.25
Eco 1
Total.
1.42
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albizia Procera
Karai
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
Terminalia Bellarica
Behera
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
Others
Badi
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
Gmelina Arborea
Gamari
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
Syzigium Cumini
Jam
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
Others
Ordinary
0
0
3
3
0
0
Total
0
0
4
7
2
1
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
14
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
No data
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Nothing mentionable.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nothing significantly found in and around the forest land proposed for diversion.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
It is a part of Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary. But due to sparse vegetation cover its impact on forests and its resources would be insignificant.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
It is a part of Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary. But due to sparse vegetation cover its impact on forests and its resources would be insignificant.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
It is a part of Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary. But due to sparse vegetation cover its impact on forests and its resources would be insignificant.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
880235
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
2.84
Tulatalibari RF
Kathalia
C-8
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Sepahijala
104358
20347.58
203.492
21
0
20/09/2017
188.39
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Sepahijala District Forest
Tripura South
DFO
Yes
Two
29/06/2017,25/10/2017
Tripura South
CF
Yes
One
20/11/2017
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Sepahijala District Forest
Tripura South
DFO
Recommended
It appears that diversion would not create any significant impact on forest and its resources in and around the site and the site may be used for other economic activities also.
Tripura South
CF
Recommended
It appears that diversion would not create any significant impact on forest and its resources in and around the site and the site may be used for other economic activities also.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
It appears that diversion would not create any significant impact on forest and its resources in and around the site and the site may be used for other economic activities also.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Tripura
State Secretary
Recommended
24/01/2018
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-TR C 011/2018-SHI
12/01/2021
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/TR/MIN/13528/2015
MIN135282015015
1,985,813.00
1,985,813.00
12/03/2021
SBIN307015597156
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
08/03/2021
10/03/2021
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) :
No
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/TR/MIN/13528/2015
26 Aug 2021
No Data
Verified.
21.
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Uploaded Letter
FP/TR/MIN/13528/2015
26 Aug 2021
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/TR/MIN/13528/2015
Compliance submitted
08 Sep 2021
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/TR/MIN/13528/2015
13 Sep 2021
APPROVED
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×