PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TN-010/2015
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Tamil Nadu
 (i) State / Union Territory : Tamil Nadu  (ii) District : Viluppuram  (iii) Forest Division : Villupuram  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.176  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Irrigation
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Villupuram0.176Reserved Forest
Total 0.176
Division 1. : Villupuram
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Viluppuram0.176
Total0.176
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.1760.6Eco 3
Total. 0.176


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Ficus RacemosaAththi0143000
2Syzigium CuminiNaaval02212310
3Azadirachta IndicaVembu060000
4Tamarindus indicusPuliyan001000
5Zizyphus JujubaIlanthai010000
6Terminalia ArjunaNeer Maruthu010000
7Cassia FistulaSarakonnai010000
8Misc. SpeciesNonamaran Moringa citrifolia010000
9Misc. SpeciesOthiyan Lannea grandis030000
10Misc. SpeciesParambai Acacia ferruginea0202100
11Misc. SpeciesVelungan030100
Total 0 7218 51 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 96

(iii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL

(iv) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The Pakkamalai reserve forest is placed under Biodiversity Conservation working circle, Wildlife management working circle and Protection overlapping working circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Though working plan refers above 30 deg slope in t
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.8
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : spotted deer, wildboar, mongoose, bonnet macaque, python, rat snake and cobra.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1095044
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
110.079Pakkamalai RFGingeeRight of way No.IV as per RF notification    View file
220.097Pakkamalai RFGingeeRight of way No.IV as per RF notification    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1
2
3
4

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Viluppuram72220335631.20135.00261521.1431/03/201521.14124.539
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
VillupuramVillupuramDFOYesOne04/06/2015
 VillupuramCFYesOne05/09/2015
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
VillupuramVillupuramDFO RecommendedThe minor irrigation project is highly essential to supply drinking water to public and is purely public oriented.
quetiapin ritalin markenavntablet.site quetiapin wirkstoff
VillupuramCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe proposal activity is to be carried out in an existing canal for irrigation and drinking water. There is no tree felling or clearing of natural vegetation is required nor also there will be any change to the landscape and alignment. Hence it is recommended.
quetiapin ritalin markenavntablet.site quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Tamil NaduState SecretaryRecommended08/02/2018Recommended and approved State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ChennaiState GovernmentGO 13218/11/2015
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/TN/IRRIG/13024/2015IN-PRINCIPLENo Data