PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
TG-0114/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Telangana
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Telangana
(ii)
District :
Adilabad
(iii)
Forest Division :
Adilabad,Bellampally,Jannaram WLM,Nirmal
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
29.216
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Drinking Water
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bellampally
2.182
Reserved Forest
2
Nirmal
3.262
Reserved Forest
3
Adilabad
2.101
Reserved Forest
4
Jannaram (WLM) (T)
21.671
Reserved Forest
Total
29.216
Division 1. : Adilabad
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Adilabad
2.101
Total
2.101
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.101
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
2.101
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Eucalyptus
0
17
0
0
0
0
2
Others
Thada
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Palakodisha
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
Teak
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
0
21
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
21
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
There will be no noticeable erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Inspection Adilabad
2
Part-II Adilabad
Division 2. : Bellampally
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Adilabad
2.182
Total
2.182
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.182
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
2.182
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
There will be no noticeable erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
It is a part of Kawal Tiger Reserve
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part-II Utnoor
2
Inspection Utnoor
Division 3. : Jannaram (WLM) (T)
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Adilabad
21.671
Total
21.671
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
21.671
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
21.671
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
There will be no noticeable erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
It is a part of Kawal Tiger Reserve and Tiger corridor of Kawal Tiger Reserve
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part-II Asifabad
2
Inspection Asifabad
Division 4. : Nirmal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Adilabad
3.262
Total
3.262
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.262
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
3.262
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Billudu
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
Others
Chennangi
0
6
0
0
2
0
3
Ippa
0
0
0
0
3
0
4
Others
Moduga
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
Nalla Maddi
0
2
0
0
8
0
6
Teak
0
3
1
1
16
0
7
Others
Theega Moduga
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Yegisa
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
Others
Drishanam
0
0
0
0
2
0
10
Others
Nalla Kodisha
0
1
0
0
4
0
11
Nemali Naara
0
2
2
0
0
0
12
Others
Palakodisha
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Peddegi
0
0
0
0
1
0
14
Others
Thiruman
0
0
0
0
2
0
Total
0
16
3
1
41
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
61
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Leopard, Gaur Chinkara, Chowsingha etc.,
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
out of 29.216 ha proposed, 24.446 ha passes through Kawal Tiger Reserve and Tiger Corridor area of Kawal Tiger Reserve
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
256.00
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
30.36
Marikala village of Venkatapuram Mandal
Venkatapuram
Sy.No. 01
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
RoFR Certificate
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Adilabad
398000
187400.13
125.07
4
164
30/04/2012
164
53.38
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bellampally
Adilabad
DFO
Yes
One
19/07/2016
Adilabad
Adilabad
DFO
Yes
One
10/11/2016
Jannaram (WLM) (T)
Adilabad
DFO
Yes
One
23/11/2016
Nirmal
Adilabad
DFO
Yes
Two
10/11/2016,23/11/2016
Adilabad
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bellampally
Adilabad
DFO
Recommended
As, the laying of Water Grid Pipeline will solve acute drinking water problems in the interior Tribal areas in LWE District of Adilabad. Hence Recommended.
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Adilabad
Adilabad
DFO
Recommended
Jannaram (WLM) (T)
Adilabad
DFO
Recommended
As the laying of Water Grid pipeline will solve acute drinking water problems in the interior tribals areas in LWE Adilabad District. Hence it is recommended for considering the proposals
Nirmal
Adilabad
DFO
Recommended
Recommended
Adilabad
CF
Recommended
Recommended
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Telangana
State Secretary
Recommended
21/06/2017
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Hyderabad
Regional Office
4-TSC096/2017-CHN
18/07/2017
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
WATER200332016325
77,157,628.00
22,433,336.00
28/09/2018
IDIBR52018092817008402
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
25/09/2018
25/09/2018
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
WATER200332016325
77,157,628.00
17,636,289.00
28/09/2018
IDIBR52018092817008395
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
25/09/2018
25/09/2018
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
WATER200332016325
77,157,628.00
1,365,903.00
28/09/2018
IDIBR52018092817008391
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
25/09/2018
25/09/2018
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
WATER200332016325
77,157,628.00
35,722,100.00
28/09/2018
IDIBR52018092817008403
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
25/09/2018
25/09/2018
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
30.36
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
8
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
1
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
30.36
Status of CA Land so identified :
Non Forest Area
Site Name :
sy no-1 Marikala village of Venkatapuram Mandal
Location Details :
sy no-1 Marikala village of Venkatapuram Mandal of mulugu district
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Mutation Status :
Mutated
Mutation Status
Circle Name.
Name of Division.
Name of Range.
Mutation Order No.
Mutation Date
How Much Area of Mutated Land Received
Mutation Letter
kothagudem
Bhadrachalam
Venkatapuram
B/281/2018
23 Feb 2019
30.36
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
20 Jul 2022
No Data
Verified and Accepted
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency(old)
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Reject Remarks
Reject Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
20 Jul 2022
EDS: Please Furnish the replies for the EDS
01 Dec 2022
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
Compliance submitted on dt: 07.02.2022
20 Jul 2022
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/TG/WATER/20033/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×