PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TG-067/2016
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Telangana
 (i) State / Union Territory : Telangana  (ii) District : Adilabad  (iii) Forest Division : Mancherial  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 3.386  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Drinking Water
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Mancherial1.126Reserved Forest
2Mancherial2.259Protected Forest
Total 3.385
Division 1. : Mancherial
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Adilabad3.386
Total3.386
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
13.3860.6Eco 3
Total. 3.386


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersNarepa007490
2Sandra002200
3Somi003110
4OthersTuniki023140
5OthersBurugu001000
6Chinduga007000
7Raavi001000
8OthersChilkaddudi0116710
9OthersMorri014000
10OthersChennangi016300
11OthersDumpidi003220
12OthersBilugu016410
13OthersTirman003110
14OthersVepa001200
15OthersKodisha001000
16Nalla Maddi02141350
17OthersMuchu Tuniki021000
18Maddi001000
19OthersTumma001010
20Eucalyptus022000
21Bojja001000
22Ippa002000
23OthersSoppera002010
24OthersPendlipala004150
25OthersPala001000
26OthersRela002000
27Nemali Naara012100
28Teak02328000
Total 0 36125 4231 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 234


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : There will be no erosion due to this project since it is laying of pipe line and construction of Structures for Providing Safe Drinking Water.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Blackbuck, spotted deer, Jackal, Sloth bear, Neelgai, Porcupine, Flying squirrels, Tree shrew, Phython etc.,
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : It is passing through Pranahitha (Blackbuck) Wildlife Sanctuary. In this effect the proposals are being submitted by the user agency in Wildlife formats, for obtaining permission from the Wildlife wing
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Pranahitha WL Sanctuary Notified vide GO Ms.No.111 F&RD For-III Dept, Dt.18.03.198
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Yes, proposed project falling in Pranahitha Blackbuck Wildlife Sanctuar
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1NalgondaThimmapuram15.8904Sy.no.147
2NalgondaThimmapuram73.944Sy.No.139
3NalgondaPeddamunigala97.8406Sy.No.169
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Enumeration List
2 RoFR Certificate
3 CA scheme
4 All in Annexes & Certificates
5 Part-III

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Adilabad225299111555.704575.28601067.40506/05/201687.772229.830
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
MancherialAdilabadDFOYesOne24/04/2016
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MancherialAdilabadDFO RecommendedRecommanded
AdilabadCF RecommendedRecommended
quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
TelanganaState SecretaryRecommended16/11/2016Recommended State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
HyderabadRegional Office4-TSB025/2016-CHN28/09/2017
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/TG/WATER/18269/2016WATER18269201675115,488,450.005,488,450.002018-09-20IDIBH18263311599Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2018-09-182018-09-18
FP/TG/WATER/18269/2016WATER18269201675115,488,450.0010,000,000.002018-09-20IDIBH18263311576Corporation BankNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2018-09-182018-09-18
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/TG/WATER/18269/2016Approved In-PrincipleNo Data