PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TG-0148/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Telangana
 (i) State / Union Territory : Telangana  (ii) District : Siddipet,Medchal  (iii) Forest Division : Siddipet,Medchal  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.1788  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Drinking Water
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Siddipet1.694u/s 18 vide Hyd Gazzette
2Medchal0.4848Reserved Forest
Total 2.1788
Division 1. : Medchal
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Medchal0.4848
Total0.4848
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.48480.2Eco 3
Total. 0.4848


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Eucalyptus (Seed Orgin)Blue gum6517218000
Total 65 17218 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 255


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Nil
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 3.029
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1SiddipetKOHEDA2.1815SY NO 876, Govt Land
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Enumeration list medchal
2 CA NFL and DFL scheme abstract
3 Site and Soil Suitability Certificate
4 Non encumbrance
5 Handover Takenover certificate
6 CA DFL MAP
7 RoFR and Gramsabha Resolution certifcate
8 Unit Cost and Maintainence
9 mutation certificate
10 CA NFL MAP
Division 2. : Siddipet
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Siddipet1.694
Total1.694
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.6940.4Eco 3
Total. 1.694


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Ficus ReligiosaRavi13150000
2Delonix Regiasisso700000
3Melia Azadirachtathurkavepa16403000
4Syzigium CuminiAllarneredu700000
5Terminalia BellaricaThani200000
6Usiriusiri2730000
7Eucalyptusneelagiri293100000
8Tectona Grandisteak730000
9Pongamia Pinnatakanuga3510000
10Holoptelia integrifolianemilinara200000
11Albezzia Amaranarlenga20000000
12Anona Squamosaseethafal500000
13Azadirachta Indicavepa5810000
14Othersbituku, bhootambujham, chennagi, chinduga, ilintha31050000
Total 505 783 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 586


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : not much prone for soil errosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.6
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1SiddipetKOHEDA2.1815SY NO 876, Govt Land
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Siddipet DFO Covering letter
2 Certificate by DFO
3 CA NFL MAP
4 Handover Takenover certificate
5 mutation certificate
6 Site and Soil Suitability Certificate
7 Non Violation certificate
8 Enumeration list siddipet
9 CA DFL MAP
10 RoFR and Gram Sabha Resolution certificate of Medchal and Siddipet
11 CA NFL and DFL scheme abstract
12 Non encumbrance
13 Unit Cost and Maintenance

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Medchal1188408422.97585.9612831.47121/10/202130.4830.21
2Siddipet35002522761.31436.79828.10617/12/2022262186.11
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
SiddipetMedakDFOYesOne27/07/2021
MedchalHyderabadDFOYesOne26/10/2021
 MedakCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MedchalHyderabadDFO Recommended Inspected the proposed forest area on 26.10.2021 for diversion of forest land to an extent of 0.4848Ha. in Lalgadi Malakpet RF for laying of pipeline and construction of other structures for safe drinking water in Medchal forest division in Medchal District. Further there are NO rare/ endangered/Unique species and NO Protected Archeological/Heritage or any other important monuments in the proposed area, it will not effect the existing forest. Hence it is recommended for diversion of forest land of 0.4848 Ha.
SiddipetMedakDFO Recommendedthe application of the user agency is recomended as the motive of the project is to provide drinking water to many villages and the benificieries is common public
MedakCF RecommendedIn view of public importance of the project it is recommended for diversion of forest land.Yes
HyderabadCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
TelanganaState SecretaryRecommended17/11/2023RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data