PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : TG-038/2021
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Telangana
 (i) State / Union Territory : Telangana  (ii) District : Mahabubabad  (iii) Forest Division : Wl Gudur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.9359  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Wl Gudur5.9359Reserved Forest
Total 5.9359
Division 1. : Wl Gudur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Mahabubabad5.9359
Total5.9359
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
15.93590Eco 3
Total. 5.9359


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Tectona Grandisteak100000
Total 1 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 1


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : No scope for soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Tiger, Leopard, Indian Gaur, Four Horn Antelope
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : It is a part of Pakhal Wildlife Sanctuary
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): Laid the road using gravel and trees extracted w
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 1
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 5.9359
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Divisional Engineer PR departmentDivisional Engineer PR departmentShow cause notive and POR issued
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1KamareddyDemi Kalan Village5.9359Sy.No.419, Demi Kalan Village, Tadwai Mandal of Kamareddy District
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Field Inspection by FDO for CA NFL
2 CA Scheme NFL
3 Violation report
4 CA Scheme Abstract
5 WL Mitigative measures
6 Unit cost of CA scheme NFL
7 NBWL approval of Mattewada to veerampet_6-123-2022WL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Mahabubabad275136106101.38134.91847017/11/202000
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Wl GudurkothagudemDFOYesOne18/03/2021
 kothagudemCFNoNo Data
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Wl GudurkothagudemDFO RecommendedRecommended with the conditions mentioned in PArt II by the FDO
kothagudemCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
TelanganaState SecretaryRecommended25/07/2021RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data