PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
TG-082/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Telangana
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Telangana
(ii)
District :
Rangareddi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Hyderabad
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1859.77
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Hyderabad
1859.77
Reserved Forest
Total
1859.77
Division 1. : Hyderabad
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Rangareddi
1859.77
Total
1859.77
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1859.77
0.2
Eco 1
Total.
1859.77
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The soil is predominantly red soil with varied degradation due to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Nalgonda
Kethepalli
140.01
Sy.No. 23,31,60
2
Nalgonda
Indurthy
131.64
Sy.No.651,757,764
3
Nalgonda
Madamamadaka and Shakavelly
31.96
Sy.No. 60 and 52
4
Nalgonda
Bachapuram and Kacharajupally
99.92
Sy.No. 106 and 124
5
Nalgonda
Neredigommu
117.8
Sy.No. 359,372,630
6
Nalgonda
Marupunthala and Modudundla
113.25
Sy.No.152 and 151
7
Nalgonda
Arrur
30.285
Sy.No. 409
8
Nalgonda
Adivemula, Thimmapur, Ramaram, Yerkaram
264.72
Sy.No. 505,418,78,128
9
Nalgonda
Mahamadabad
8.99
Sy.No.266
10
Nalgonda
Somarajguda
25.11
Sy.No. 2
11
Nalgonda
Tirugundlapally
64
Sy.No.103
12
Nalgonda
Chennaram
14.89
Sy.No.174
13
Mahbubnagar
Nagilla
145.176
Sy.No.100
14
Mahbubnagar
Pullagiri
195.993
Sy.No.145 & 247
15
Nalgonda
Chintalapalem
116.92
Sy.No. 223,222
16
Nalgonda
Parvedula
58.86
Sy.No. 60, 61, 167,142
17
Nalgonda
Nereda
35.34
Sy.No.172
18
Nalgonda
Chintakuntla
29.68
Sy.No. 380A, 380B, 380C
19
Nalgonda
Vattipalli
16.51
Sy.No.127
20
Nalgonda
Marriguda
7.14
Sy.No.161
21
Nalgonda
Kudhabaxpally
56.25
Sy.No. 263A, 263B, 263C
22
Nalgonda
Peddapuram
72.51
Sy.No.286
23
Nalgonda
Narayanapur
62.55
Sy.No. 362
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Enumeration List
2
RoFR Certificate
3
Certificates
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Rangareddi
749321
70315.07
1407.639
30
0
05/01/2011
0
32.21
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Hyderabad
Hyderabad
DFO
Yes
Two
01/04/2016,09/04/2016
Hyderabad
CF
Yes
One
31/05/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Hyderabad
Hyderabad
DFO
Recommended
Recommended with subject to conditions in DFO Recommendation
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Hyderabad
CF
Recommended
Recommended
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Telangana
State Secretary
Recommended
01/06/2016
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×