PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
SK-09/2015
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Sikkim
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Sikkim
(ii)
District :
Namchi
(iii)
Forest Division :
South Territorial
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
40.9299
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Transmission Line
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
South Territorial
40.9299
Reserved Forest
Total
40.9299
Division 1. : South Territorial
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
South
40.9299
Total
40.9299
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
27.6
0.4
Eco 6
2
13.3299
0.4
Eco 5
Total.
40.9299
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Angari
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
P. Nepalensis (Ser) Stendel
Arupatey
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
Others
Buk
0
0
0
0
1
61
4
Schima Wallichii Chois
Chilauney
0
0
1
9
5
37
5
Cryptomeria Japonica
Dhupi
0
48
166
132
25
14
6
Others
Ghingne
0
3
0
0
0
0
7
Albzzia Spp.
Jamna
0
0
0
0
1
0
8
Castanopsis Tribuloides
Katus
2
18
13
5
14
78
9
Machilus Gamieana
Kawla
0
0
1
0
1
3
10
Duabanga Sonneratioides
Lampatey
0
0
0
0
0
1
11
Juglans regia
Okhar
0
0
1
1
0
0
12
Machilus Edulis
Phunchey
0
8
0
0
0
4
13
Machelia Lanuginosa
Phurse Chanp
0
1
1
0
0
0
14
Albezzia Labbeck
Siris
0
0
0
0
0
1
15
Beilschmiedia Gammieana King
Tarshing
0
0
0
0
1
3
16
Machelia Cathcartii
Title Chanp
0
0
0
0
0
1
17
Cedrela Febrifuga Blume
Toni
0
0
0
1
0
0
18
Alnus Nepalensis
Uttis
0
1
11
17
35
49
19
Others
Myrsine semiserrata, Echinocarus dasycarpus, Sympolcus theifoklia, Nyssia javanka, Macaranga denticu
0
1
9
0
4
20
Total
2
80
205
165
87
272
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
811
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Toposheet Map
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The proposed land for diversion does not form a part of any seriously eroded areas except which is due to natural factors
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.5
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NA
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
707.33278
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
30.39
Ramaram RF
Namchi
00
View file
2
2
7.14
Ramaram RF
Namchi
00
View file
3
3
8.85
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
4
4
8.85
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
5
5
23.24
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
6
6
1.85
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
7
7
0.37
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
8
8
0.22
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
9
9
0.24
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
10
10
0.87
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
11
11
3.75
Tendong RF
Namchi
00
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Non Availability of forest land
2
Arial distance from WL Sanctury
3
Part II
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Namchi
75000
57200
395.6204
84
608.636
31/03/2011
521.14
2.5
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
South Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Yes
One
17/03/2018
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
South Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Recommended
Recommendation of DFO Concern
Territorial
CF
Recommended
Recommendation of Conservator of Forest Territorial
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Diversion of 40.9299 Ha.of Forest land for Construction of 400kV Transmission Line Teesta III to Kishanganj Loop Out at RANGPO by POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED a Govt. of India Enterprise . RECOMMENDATION OF NODAL OFFICER FCA
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Sikkim
State Secretary
Recommended
19/12/2018
Diversion of 40.9299 Ha.of Forest land for Construction of 400kV Transmission Line Teesta III to Kishanganj Loop Out at RANGPO by POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED a Govt. of India Enterprise . RECOMMENDATION OF SECRETARY
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Kolkata
Regional Office
3-SK C 023/2019-SHI
23/01/2019
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/SK/TRANS/10009/2015
TRANS100092015018
111,156,932.00
111,156,932.00
2019-02-21
SBINR52019022100122143
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2019-02-19
2019-02-21
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/SK/TRANS/10009/2015
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×