PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
SK-033/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Sikkim
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Sikkim
(ii)
District :
Gangtok
(iii)
Forest Division :
East Territorial
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
10.794
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
East Territorial
10.794
Gaucharan-0.151ha. Khasmal-6.397ha. Reserve Forest-4.245ha.
Total
10.794
Division 1. : East Territorial
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
East
10.794
Total
10.794
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
10.794
0.5
Eco 5
Total.
10.794
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Schima Wallichii Chois
Chilauney
0
60
10
21
32
32
2
Others
Mauwa
0
20
4
4
1
3
3
Castanopsis
Katus
0
25
0
3
2
1
4
Rhus Spp.
Bakimlo
0
15
0
3
2
1
5
Ailanthus Grandis Prain
Gokul
0
0
0
0
2
3
6
Acer Cambelli
Phirpherey
0
2
3
2
1
2
7
Others
Kutmero
0
5
1
3
3
1
8
Others
Gulmohar
0
3
0
0
0
1
9
Cinnamomum Zeylanicum
Sinkaula
0
2
0
0
0
0
10
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Jarul
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
18
0
1
2
2
12
Others
Bottle brush
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Jamun
0
2
0
0
0
0
14
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Foksay
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Eucalyptus
Tarpin
0
1
0
2
0
0
16
Greviia Robusta
Silver Oak
0
10
0
5
1
1
17
Albzzia Spp.
Siris
0
0
2
7
15
17
18
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Panisaj
0
0
0
3
3
8
19
Erythrina Indica
Phalado
0
7
0
0
1
2
20
Ficus Bengalensis
Bar
0
0
0
1
3
2
21
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
0
0
0
0
1
22
Moringa oleifera
sajna
0
0
0
0
0
2
23
Others
Dabdabey
0
0
0
5
0
0
24
Ficus Mysorensis
Kabra
0
0
0
0
1
0
25
Others
Malato
0
0
3
1
1
1
26
Tectona Grandis
Teak
0
0
2
0
1
1
27
Others
Bangi
0
0
1
0
0
0
28
Ficus Lacor
Khanew
0
0
0
0
1
0
29
Prunus Nepotensis
Paiyun
0
0
1
4
1
2
30
Betula Cylindrostachys
Sour
0
0
0
0
0
1
31
Bischofia Javanica
Kaizal
0
0
0
0
1
2
32
Ficus Religiosa
Nevara
0
0
0
0
1
0
33
Bombax Ceiba
Simal
0
0
1
0
0
1
34
Duabanga Grandiflora
Lampatey
0
0
3
2
12
15
35
Terminalia Tomentosa
Pakhasaj
0
0
0
4
4
2
Total
0
172
31
72
91
104
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
470
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Being hilly terrain the problem of soil cannot be ignored.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.2
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NA.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
4045908
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
4.266
Pachey RF
Pakyong
0.00
View file
2
2
4.368
Thekabong RF
Pakyong
0.00
View file
3
3
2.16
Gnathang RF
Phadamchen
0.00
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Enclosed Part-II.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Gangtok
95400
61051
993.33
132
1565.77
31/03/2013
746.42
0.00
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
East Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Yes
One
16/01/2017
Territorial
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
East Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Recommended
Recommended by DFO (T) East.
Territorial
CF
Recommended
Recommendation of CF
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommendation of Nodal Officer
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Sikkim
State Secretary
Recommended
09/03/2017
Recommendation of Secretary
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Kolkata
Regional Office
3-SK C 078/2017-SHI
31/08/2017
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/SK/ROAD/22174/2016
ROAD221742016705
13,166,838.00
4,045,908.00
2017-9-25
SYNBR92017092500828777
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2017-09-21
2017-09-21
FP/SK/ROAD/22174/2016
ROAD221742016705
13,166,838.00
81,985.00
2018-03-13
P18031302549363
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2017-09-21
2017-09-21
FP/SK/ROAD/22174/2016
ROAD221742016705
13,166,838.00
100,000.00
2018-03-13
P18031302545583
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2017-09-21
2017-09-21
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/SK/ROAD/22174/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×