PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
SK-012/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Sikkim
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Sikkim
(ii)
District :
Gangtok
(iii)
Forest Division :
East Territorial
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
4.5
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
East Territorial
4.5
Reserved Forest
Total
4.5
Division 1. : East Territorial
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
4.5
0.4
Eco 5
Total.
4.5
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Cryptomeria Japonica
Dhupi
0
397
162
32
19
4
2
Schima Wallichii Chois
Chilauney
157
320
118
51
8
19
3
Alnus Nepolensis
Uttis
10
34
2
1
0
2
4
Spondias Axillaris
Lopsi
10
26
13
3
0
0
5
Others
Bapari
200
98
9
2
1
3
6
P. Cerasoides D.Don
Cherry
20
26
5
4
3
0
7
P. Cerasoides D.Don
Cherry
20
26
5
4
3
0
8
Others
Dhalney Katus
173
129
19
5
3
9
9
Others
Malato
80
48
13
10
1
1
10
Others
Khanakpa
10
24
14
5
4
0
11
Others
Mahawa
80
47
15
5
1
3
12
Spondias Axillaris
Lopsi
10
26
13
3
0
0
13
P. Cerasoides D.Don
Cherry
20
26
5
4
3
0
14
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Panisaj
10
16
10
3
0
0
15
Others
Phnalamay
0
4
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Kaulo
1
0
0
0
0
0
17
Bischofia Javanica
Kaijal
10
12
0
0
0
1
18
Albizia Procera
Siris
0
2
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Khanue
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
Others
Lalupatey
0
8
0
0
0
0
21
Machilus Edulis
Pumsi
0
2
0
0
0
0
22
M.Champaca
Champ
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
Others
Pherphere
21
29
16
0
0
0
24
Machilus Edulis
Phunchay
0
2
0
0
0
0
25
Others
Bhadrasey
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
Others
Timbur
0
0
1
0
0
0
27
Others
Bantey
0
2
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Bangey
0
26
3
0
0
0
29
Daphiphyllum Himalayense
Lakh Chandan
0
22
0
0
0
0
30
Castanopsis
Katus
0
189
16
6
0
0
31
Others
Sour
0
75
0
0
0
0
32
Others
Bori
0
3
0
0
0
0
33
Erythrina Indica
Phaledo
0
18
0
0
0
0
34
Others
Lati Kati
0
25
8
0
0
0
35
Rhus Spp.
Bhakimilo
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
832
1665
447
138
47
42
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
3171
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Being hilly terrain the problem of soin erosion to some extent cannot be ignored.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Not Available
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
17.40784
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
9.0
Bulbuley RF
Gangtok
0.00
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part II
2
Joint Certificate for non availability of non forest land for CA
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Gangtok
95400.00
61051.00
993.33
132
1565.77
31/03/2013
746.42
0.00
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
East Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Yes
One
12/04/2018
Territorial
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
East Territorial
Territorial
DFO
Recommended
Recommendation of DFO
Territorial
CF
Recommended
Recommendation of CF
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommendation of Nodal Officer
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Sikkim
State Secretary
Recommended
12/06/2018
Recommendation of Secretary
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×