PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
RJ-023/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Rajasthan
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Rajasthan
(ii)
District :
Karauli
(iii)
Forest Division :
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
8.5635
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
8.5635
Protected Forest
Total
8.5635
Division 1. : RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Karauli
8.5635
Total
8.5635
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
8.5635
0.2
Eco 3
Total.
8.5635
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Nilotica
Desi babool
33
32
12
4
2
0
2
Acacia leucophloea
Ronjh
17
04
0
0
0
0
3
Holoptelia integrifolia
Churail(papadee)
2
03
1
0
0
0
4
Prosophis Juliflora
Juliflora
0
01
0
0
0
0
5
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
01
1
0
0
0
6
Ficus Religiosa
peepal
0
01
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Dhok
6
03
3
0
0
0
8
Others
Peelu
3
05
1
1
0
0
9
Others
Gurgan
0
02
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Goya khair
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
Others
Kair
2
0
0
0
0
0
12
Moringa oleifera
Sahajana
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
64
52
19
5
2
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
142
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
In Proposed T.C.P. for the period 2013-14 to 2022-23,no prescription is mentioned.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Nil
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
This sanctuary has decent population of Tiger, Leopard, Caracal, Indian Wolf, Jackal, Sloth Bear, Hyena, Chinkara, Sambhar, Spotted Deer, Wild boars, and Fox etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This project being of Construction of Widening & Strengthening of road, aims at creating public infrastructure and hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat, if the design of the plan is proper in terms of wild life free movement and noise and light (high beam) strict norms.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
This project being of Construction of Widening & Strengthening of road, aims at creating public infrastructure and hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat, if the design of the plan is proper in terms of wild life free movement and noise and light (high beam) strict norm
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This project being of Construction of Widening & Strengthening of road, aims at creating public infrastructure and hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat, if the design of the plan is proper in terms of wild life free movement and noise and light (high beam) strict norm
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
It has been found that the user agency has violate
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
15
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
08.5635
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
NIL
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Karauli
Kased
8.5635
1276/1211
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV Calculation Sheet MDR 3A
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Karauli
552400
77442.207
41.3
2
0
21/08/2023
0
9.1
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
Bharatpur Wildlife
DFO
Yes
Two
29/05/2023,08/08/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
Bharatpur Wildlife
DFO
Recommended
As Attached Report
Bharatpur Wildlife
CF
Not-Recommended
cheke list not follow
No
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×