PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
RJ-043/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Rajasthan
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Rajasthan
(ii)
District :
Kota
(iii)
Forest Division :
Kota Territorial
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
96
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Kota Territorial
96
Reserved Forest
Total
96
Division 1. : Kota Territorial
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Kota
96
Total
96
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
96
0
Eco 3
Total.
96
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Ficus Bengalensis
bargad
0
0
2
20
1
0
2
Ficus Religiosa
pipal
0
2
10
22
6
1
3
Dalburgia Sisoo
sisam
2
15
14
8
1
0
4
Delonix Regia
gulmoher
0
2
6
0
0
0
5
Prosophis Spicigera
jangle jelebi
0
0
8
6
1
0
6
Eucalyptus
safeda
0
0
2
3
0
1
7
Bauhinia Parviflora
kachnar
0
1
4
0
0
0
8
Aegle Marmelos
bilvepatra
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
Albezzia Labbeck
siras
0
0
1
0
0
0
10
Peltoform Pterocarpum
paltaform
0
1
2
0
0
0
11
Cassia Fistula
amaltash
0
2
2
0
0
0
12
Ficus Racemosa
gular
0
0
1
1
0
0
13
Saraca Asoca
ashok
0
3
0
0
0
0
14
Pongamia Pinnata
karange
0
0
1
0
0
0
15
Bombax Ceiba
samal
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
10
12
44
16
1
0
17
Ailanthus excelsa
Ardu
1
1
7
0
0
0
18
Holoptelia integrifolia
Churel
7
7
5
0
0
0
19
Acacia leucophloea
Ronjh
1
4
2
0
0
0
20
Others
Khajoor
0
0
1
0
1
0
21
Others
Dhok
0
1
0
0
0
0
22
Others
Goya Khair
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
Acacia Catechu
Khair
3
0
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Gurjan
2
0
2
0
0
0
25
Others
Medula
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
Others
Kutaj
2
0
0
0
0
0
Total
29
53
114
77
11
2
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
286
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Soil Conservation & Rehabilitation Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
area is not vulnerable for soil erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nilgai
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Enchroment is done by Construction of shops on 24.
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
1996
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
24.06
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
RIICO
RIICO KOTA
RIICO
2
Sh BD Agarwal
Sectary of Mandi
FIR Issued
3
Sh Tej singh Kalvi
Ex Sectray of mandi
FIR issued
4
Sh OP Sharma
Ex Regional Manager
FIR issued
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Kota
BORINA KHURD
24.84
174
2
Kota
GURAYTHA
32.99
74,75,79,80,81,82,83,94,95,100,114,474
3
Kota
KUDAIT
15.12
3
4
Kota
KOTHARI
23.05
299,304,311,386
5
Kota
BADGOUN SHAMBUPURA NANTA
192
1054,1055,1056,1057,1748,1757,2
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Recommandation latter with sign
2
Wall Amount Deposit Undertaking
3
DD
4
Violation Responsible Person
5
Block Notification
6
Undertaking no new construction
7
EDS Reply
8
Inspection
9
Undertaking wall
10
CA DFL DGPS Map
11
NFL Site Suitability
12
NFL Toposheet
13
CA DFL Scheme
14
CA DFL Scheme Summary
15
NPV Calculation
16
RVPNL explanation on Transmission Line
17
Ummedganj Conservation Reserve NOC
18
Violation Area Survey
19
CA DFL Toposheet
20
MoEF EDS Reply dated 22-09-2024
21
CA DFL Site Suitability
22
Water Resource NOC
23
NFL DGPS Map
24
CCF Kota Report on proposed diversion site's unsuitability of plantation
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Kota
521700
76654.84
2086.146
29
467.156
15/12/2017
457.135
497.80
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Kota Territorial
Kota
DFO
Yes
One
03/07/2020
Kota
CF
Yes
One
13/04/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Kota Territorial
Kota
DFO
Recommended
THERE IS NO ALTERNATE WAY FOR BHAMASHAH KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI
Kota
CF
Recommended
As per order of Honourable SC, the MOEF & CC has imposed the condition number 5 for developing the green corridor along with NH-76 upto the distance of one kilometer in width on both sides of the NH-76. Hence first of all this condition imposed by the Honorable SC has to be waved first, only then the proposal can be recommended for diversion to avoid any adverse action by the Honorable SC.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Proposal may be accepted and recommended for approval with subject to the condition as under attached document
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Rajasthan
State Secretary
Recommended
09/05/2023
Proposal may be accepted & recommended for approval subject to the condition as under. Hon ble Supreme Court has given direction in the FCA proposal Development of NH 76 East West Corridor in Kota District Final sanctioned on 6.7.2007 to maintain green belt on both the sides of the Kota bypass up to 1 km. The proposed forest area involve in extension of Bhamashah mandi falls under this green belt area. Nodal Officer FCA & CCF, Kota has suggested that the proposed forest land is not suitable for planting. Plantation activities can be taken near by the green belt area. This relaxation is to be given by Ministry.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×