PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
RJ-0108/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Rajasthan
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Rajasthan
(ii)
District :
Karauli
(iii)
Forest Division :
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.753
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Optical Fibre Cable
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
0.753
Protected Forest
Total
0.753
Division 1. : RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Karauli
0.753
Total
0.753
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.753
0.2
Eco 3
Total.
0.753
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Nilotica
Desi babool
33
32
12
4
2
0
2
Acacia leucophloea
Ronj
17
04
0
0
0
0
3
Holoptolia Integrifolia
Churail
2
03
1
0
0
0
4
Prasophis sinereria
Juliflora
0
01
0
0
0
0
5
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
01
1
0
0
0
6
Ficus Religiosa
Peepal
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Dhonk
6
3
3
0
0
0
Total
58
45
17
4
2
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
126
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
In Proposed T.C.P. for the period 2022-23 to 2031-32,no prescription is mentioned.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Nil
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
These sanctuaries have decent population of Tigers, wild boars, Leopard, Caracal, Indian Wolf, Jackal, Sloth Bear, Hyena, Chinkara, Sambhar, Spotted Deer, Fox, Ghariyal and Crocodile etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This project being of provide 4G mobile network connectivity, hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
This project being of provide 4G mobile network connectivity, hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
This project being of provide 4G mobile network connectivity, hence is in public interest. Although project is not likely to have any significant damaging impact on the wildlife on their habitat.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
1020404
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
04.143
Veeram ki Guwadi
KELA DEVI
37
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Karauli
552400
77442.207
42.6737
3
0
22/12/2023
0
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bharatpur Wildlife
CF
No
One
No Data
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
Bharatpur Wildlife
DFO
Yes
One
No Data
21/12/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
RTR Buffer Karauli Wildlife
Bharatpur Wildlife
DFO
Recommended
In the Karauli district the proposed site for laying of OFC which is notified Keladevi Sanctuary & National Chambal ghariyal Sanctuary together with part of C.T.H. of RTR & DKTR, as per notified forest blocks no road exists in the records. Hence user agency has submitted proposal for diversion under FCA 1980. However, if Forest clearance is issued, then the following conditions must be imposed 1. The user agency will make good the trenches after laying of the OFC. 2. No night camping of labour inside forest/ sanctuary would be allowed. 3. No material i.e. stone / sand / wood etc. shall be collected by the user agency from the forest land/sanctuary area. 4. The user agency will have to submit/obtain necessary NOC/sanctions from the concern agency/department prior to execution of the work. 5. In future prior permission will be taken for maintenance work. 6. The user agency have to deposit amount for NPV and CA as per prevailing rates.
Bharatpur Wildlife
CF
Recommended
recommendet
Yes
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×