PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
PB-0264/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Punjab
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Punjab
(ii)
District :
Rupnagar
(iii)
Forest Division :
Rupnagar
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.44
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Rupnagar
0.44
Protected Forest
Total
0.44
Division 1. : Rupnagar
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Rupnagar
0.44
Total
0.44
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.44
0.02
Eco 3
Total.
0.44
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Shisham, Drekm Teak, Misc.
0
1
10
3
2
5
Total
0
1
10
3
2
5
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
21
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
No Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
construction of Steel Bridge will not be cause of erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No Wildlife present in and around the proposed forest land.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
1316725
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
1.10
FATEHPUR PROTECTED FOREST
Rupnagar
N.A.
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
3 (iii) DGPS MAP OF PROJECT SITE
2
USER AGENCY CASE SUBMITTED LETTER
3
FRA CERTIFICATE
4
1 (i) PART I OF USER AGENCY
5
1 (ii) CH 03 DETAIL NOTE ON THE PROJECT
6
1 (iv) CH 07 NON FOREST LAND INVOLVED
7
1 (vi) CH 21 PROJECT APPROVAL
8
7 (i) FRA UNDERTAKING
9
8 (vii) UNDERTAKING FOR PENDING PROPOSAL
10
CH 09 JUSTIFICATION FOR LOCATING THE PROJECT
11
CH 10 MINIMUM USE OF FOREST LAND
12
CA SCHEME
13
CH 22 HEAD WORKS NOC
14
LAST PROFORMA
15
SOI MAP OF PROJECT SITE
16
UNDERTAKING NO VIOLATION WORK DONE
17
8 (i ii) CH 11 UNDERTAKING FOR PAYMENT OF CA PCAAND ADDL CA FOR TALL PLANTS
18
CH 23 27 28 30
19
2 ii) CH 06 DETAIL OF FOREST AREA OR LEGAL STAUTS
20
3 (i) LAYOUT PLAN
21
8 (viii ix) UNDERTAKING FOR APP PROCESSSING GPM AND MARKING OF TREES
22
AFFIDAVIT OF USER AGENCY
23
TYPE OF USER AGENCY
24
2 (i) BREAK UP OF AREA OF FOREST LAND ANNEXURE I
25
4 (i) CH 14 MARKING LIST OF TREES
26
8 (vi) UNDERTAKING FOR PAYMENT OF RESERVE PRICE OF TREES
27
UNDERTAKING FOR PROVIDING NON FOREST LAND
28
OBJECTION REMOVAL LETTER
29
REVISED CHECK LIST 17
30
8 (iii iv) CH 12 UNDERTAKING FOR PAYMENT OF NPV AND ADDL NPV
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Rupnagar
144000
4117.84
564.064
149
999.484
31/03/2016
983.345
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rupnagar
Shiwalik Circle
DFO
Yes
One
20/12/2021
Shiwalik Circle
CF
Yes
One
31/12/2021
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Rupnagar
Shiwalik Circle
DFO
Recommended
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL PLEASE
Shiwalik Circle
CF
Recommended
Recommended for approval
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Public Utility Project
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Punjab
State Secretary
Recommended
11/04/2022
Public Utility Project
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Chandigarh
State Government
FOREST-FCA0FC4R/1/2022-FCA
06/04/2022
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/PB/ROAD/147091/2021
ROAD1470912021958
1,867,115.00
1,867,120.00
05/07/2022
CNRBR52022070585625529
Union Bank of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
29/06/2022
30/06/2022
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/PB/ROAD/147091/2021
IN-PRINCIPLE
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×