PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : OR-092/2021
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Orissa
 (i) State / Union Territory : Orissa  (ii) District : Jharsuguda  ,Sambalpur  (iii) Forest Division : Jharsuguda,Sambalpur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.0234  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Pipeline
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Jharsuguda1.6578Revenue Forest
2Sambalpur0.3656Revenue Forest
Total 2.0234
Division 1. : Jharsuguda
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Jharsuguda1.6578
Total1.6578
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.65780.4Eco 3
Total. 1.6578


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Madhuca indicaMahul000001
2Terminalia TomentosaAsan000101
3Terminalia bellericaBahada010000
4Buchanania lanzanChar1091000
5Anogeissus latifoliaDharua100000
6Terminalia ChebulaHarida202000
7Syzigium CuminiJamun001000
8Anacardium OccidentaleKaju000010
9Cleistanthus collinusKarala010000
10Bridelia retusaKasi030000
11Diospyros melanoxylonKendu001000
12Bridelia retusaKhaes4100000
13Mangifera indicaMahul122000
14Mangifera indicaMango700010
15Azadirachta indicaNeem030000
16Butea monospermaPalasa173100
17Shorea robustaSal25100902
18Boswellia SerrataSalei110000
19Bombox CeibaSimili010000
20Borassus flabelliferTal000010
Total 52 4810 113 4
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 128


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Mostly the forest land involved in this project are plain land & not affected soil erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1.0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The Wildlife noticed in the proposed area are Elephant (Elephas maximus indicus) Wild Pig (Sus scrofa cristatus( Spotted deer ( Axis axis sxis) Hanuman (Presbytis entlellus entellus) Odha (Lutra perspicillata perspicillata) Gunduchi musa (Funambulus Pennanti) Thekua (Felis chous kutas), Birds like Bulbul (Pycnonotus barbatus) Parakeet (Melopsittacus undulates) Tentei (Vanellus malabaricus) etc., Snake like Dhandasapa (Enhydris enhydris ) Naga Sapa (Naga naja kothia) Tree snakes (Lycodon striatus) etc., Lizards like Jhitipiti (Hemidactylus brooki gray ) Endua (Hemidactylus maculatus) etc. ,Amphibian like Common Indian Toad (Bufo melanostictus) Skipping Frog (Rana cyanophlyctis )Marbled Toad (Bufo stomaticus ) India Bull Frog (Rana tigerina) etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 5321750.00
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
115.0Hondatupa VFBagdehi1857    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL
Division 2. : Sambalpur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Sambalpur0.3656
Total0.3656
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.36560.3Eco 3
Total. 0.3656


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Buchanania lanzanChar010000
2Garuga PinnataKekat131000
3Careya arboreaKumbhi011000
4Butea monospermaPalasa001000
5Shorea RobustaSal320163
6Terminalia TomentosaSahaja010000
Total 4 83 16 3
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 25


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The applied area is very small and trees to be felled is also less in number. So by felling of the trees in the applied area, there will no significant soil erosion in nearby fores
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 1.324
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The Wildlife noticed in the proposed area are Elephant (Elephas maximus indicus) Wild Pig (Sus scrofa cristatus( Spotted deer ( Axis axis sxis) Hanuman (Presbytis entlellus entellus) Odha (Lutra perspicillata perspicillata) Gunduchi musa (Funambulus Pennanti) Thekua (Felis chous kutas), Birds like Bulbul (Pycnonotus barbatus) Parakeet (Melopsittacus undulates) Tentei (Vanellus malabaricus) etc., Snake like Dhandasapa (Enhydris enhydris ) Naga Sapa (Naga naja kothia) Tree snakes (Lycodon striatus) etc., Lizards like Jhitipiti (Hemidactylus brooki gray ) Endua (Hemidactylus maculatus) etc. ,Amphibian like Common Indian Toad (Bufo melanostictus) Skipping Frog (Rana cyanophlyctis )Marbled Toad (Bufo stomaticus ) India Bull Frog (Rana tigerina) etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Brief Description forwarding
2 Site Inspection Report
3 Part-II
4 Site Inspection Pic

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Jharsuguda  211443492.3522821.9553341711.87211/04/20221343.13552.77
2Sambalpur665700363177657.3856252257.7309/03/20222040.2336143.228
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
JharsugudaSambalpurDFOYesOne11.03.2022
SambalpurSambalpurDFOYesOne13/01/2022
 SambalpurCFNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
SambalpurSambalpurDFO RecommendedThe pipeline route has been fixed considering technical and economic feasibility of the project by GAIL India Limited. Since the proposed pipeline will be crossing Revenue along 15 villages of Laikera, Kolabira, Jharsuguda and Lakhanpur Tahasils respectively and 2 villages of Gumakarma and Khadiapali of Rengali Tahasils of Sambalpur district in the State of Odisha. As this is the most feasible route to connect the Aditya Birla Plant ABPL and Tata Refractories Limited TRL part of Jagdishpur Haldia Bokaro Dhamra Gas Pipeline Project, crossing of the forest area in unavoidable.
JharsugudaSambalpurDFO Recommended 1.6578 ha. forest land proposed for laying of Natural Gas Pipeline to Aditya Birla Plant ABPL & Tata Refractories Limited TRL under Bokaro Angul Pipeline Project of JHBDPL Phase II Project in Jharsuguda District is recommended for diversion in favour of General Manager, Const. GAIL India Limited, Bhubaneswar.
SambalpurCF RecommendedProposal for diversion of 2.0234 ha. of forest land 1.6578 ha. falling in Jharsuguda Forest Division and 0.3656 ha. in Sambalpur Forest Division for laying of Natural Gas Pipeline to Aditya Birla Plant ABPL and Tata Refractories Limited TRL under Bokaro Angul Pipeline Project of JHBDPL Phase II Project in Sambalpur & Jharsuguda District. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended for diversion of 2.0234 ha Jharsuguda Division 1.6578 ha + Sambalpur Division 0.3656 ha of forest land for laying of Natural Gas Pipeline to Aditya Birla Plant ABPL & Tata Refractories Limited TRL under Bokaro Angul Pipeline Project of JHBDPL Phase II Project under Smabalpur Forest Division of Sambalpur District and Jharsuguda Forest Division of Jharsuguda District, Odisha by GAIL India Ltd. For approval under Section 2 ii of Forest Conservation Act for approval under Section 2 ii of Forest conservation Act, 1980.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
OrissaState SecretaryRecommended06/08/2022RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
BhubaneswarRegional Office5-ORB526/2022-BHU29/08/2022
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/OR/Pipeline/148855/2021PIPELINE14885520210086,967,272.006,967,272.002022-09-20727441Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2022-09-132022-09-16
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/OR/Pipeline/148855/2021Approved In-PrincipleNo Data