PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
OR-09/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Orissa
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Orissa
(ii)
District :
Sundargarh,Jharsuguda ,Sambalpur,Debgarh,Anugul
(iii)
Forest Division :
Rourkela,Sundargarh,Jharsuguda,Bamra WL,Rairakhol
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
65.4036
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Rairakhol
7.2598
Revenue Forest
2
Jharsuguda
0.7705
Revenue Forest
3
Angul
7.0096
Reserved Forest
4
Angul
3.2416
Revenue Forest
5
Angul
0.5214
District Level Committee (D.L.C.) Forest
6
Bamra WL
2.1152
Revenue Forest
7
Bamra WL
2.1357
Reserved Forest
8
Bamra WL
5.8462
Sabik Forest
9
Bamra WL
4.4696
District Level Committee (D.L.C.) Forest
10
Sundargarh
1.0948
Protected Forest
11
Rourkela
3.4062
Reserved Forest
12
Deogarh
26.5104
Revenue Forest
13
Deogarh
1.0226
Reserved Forest
Total
65.4036
Division 1. : Angul
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Anugul
10.7726
Total
10.7726
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
10.7726
0.5
Eco 1
Total.
10.7726
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Shorea Robusta
Sal
0
249
59
1
0
0
2
Buchanania lanzan
Chara
0
232
3
0
0
0
3
Syzigium Cumini
Jamu
0
1
1
0
0
0
4
Soymida febrifuga
Rohini
0
3
0
0
0
0
5
Terminalia belerica
Bahada
0
12
1
0
0
0
6
Terminalia Tomentosa
Asan
0
3
0
0
0
0
7
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
2
0
0
0
0
8
Terminalia Chebula
Harida
0
2
0
0
0
0
9
Lannea coromandelica
Mai
0
4
1
0
0
0
10
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Aegle marmelos
Bela
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Albizia Procera
Sirisa
0
0
4
4
1
0
Total
0
512
69
5
1
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
587
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Tropical Moist deciduous forest
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Elephant, Barking Deer , Indian Hare, Indian pea foul, Blue jay, Egrets, Kingfisher, Drogo
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site inspection report of Angul
2
Authorization of Angul
3
Form A Angul
4
CA Undertaking Angul
5
Basic-information of Angul
6
DGPS Map Angul
7
land schedule angul
8
Layout MAP angul
9
Note Of The Project angul
10
Part II of Angul
11
TOPO Map angul
12
Trees forest land angul
13
Rehabilitation
14
species wise local Scientific of angul
15
FRA Angul
16
Justification Angul
Division 2. : Bamra WL
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Sambalpur
14.5667
Total
14.5667
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
14.5667
0.5
Eco 3
Total.
14.5667
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Dalbergia sisoo
Sisu
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
Bombax Ceiba
Simel
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
Acacia Concinna
Kekat
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
1
1
0
0
0
6
Acacia Auricuiformis
Akasi
0
2
0
0
0
0
7
Pterocarpus marsupium
Asan
0
7
0
4
3
0
8
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Bija
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
Buchanania lanzan
Char
0
11
1
0
0
0
10
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
7
8
2
1
0
12
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kemdu
0
0
5
4
0
0
13
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
17
11
12
5
3
14
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
1
0
0
15
Butea monosperma
Palasa
0
7
1
0
0
0
16
Butea monosperma
Pia Sala
0
1
3
1
0
0
17
Couroupita Guianensis
Rahani
0
5
2
1
1
1
18
Terminalia Tomentosa
Sahaja
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
Shorea Robusta
Sala
0
31
15
8
4
3
20
Chloroxylon swietenia
Veru
0
1
4
0
0
0
21
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asan
0
1
3
1
1
0
22
Buchanania lanzan
Char
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
2
0
0
0
0
24
Acacia Concinna
Kekat
0
1
0
0
0
0
25
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
1
0
0
0
0
26
Schleichera oleosa
Kusum
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
0
2
0
0
0
28
Shorea Robusta
Sala
0
19
8
1
0
0
29
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asan
0
1
0
0
0
0
30
Ficus Bengalensis
Banyan
0
0
1
0
0
1
31
Semecarpus Anacardium
Bhelua
0
0
1
0
0
0
32
Buchanania lanzan
Char
0
7
1
0
0
0
33
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
1
0
0
0
0
34
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
1
1
1
0
0
35
Acacia Concinna
Kekat
0
0
1
0
0
0
36
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
0
1
0
0
0
37
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
1
0
1
0
0
38
Shorea Robusta
Sala
0
33
1
1
0
6
39
Chloroxylon swietenia
Veru
0
0
2
1
0
0
40
Acacia Auricuiformis
Akasi
0
1
4
0
1
0
41
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
0
1
0
1
0
42
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asan
0
19
22
11
6
3
43
Ficus Bengalensis
Banyan
0
1
0
1
0
3
44
Pterocarpus marsupium
Bija
0
1
2
1
0
0
45
Buchanania lanzan
Char
0
27
9
0
0
0
46
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
5
4
2
1
3
47
Ficus Racemosa
Dumer
0
1
1
0
0
0
48
Terminalia Chebula
Harida
0
0
0
1
0
0
49
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
3
1
4
2
5
50
Misc. Species
Karla
0
5
1
0
0
0
51
Acacia Concinna
Kekat
0
2
3
0
0
1
52
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
3
13
8
4
2
53
Holoptelea integrifolia
Kurei
0
4
0
0
0
0
54
Misc. Species
Karma
0
10
1
1
0
0
55
Mammea Longifolia
Mahula
1
54
52
30
21
27
56
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
1
2
0
57
Misc. Species
Muit
0
0
0
0
0
1
58
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
1
0
0
0
0
59
Butea monosperma
Palasa
1
12
5
2
3
0
60
Misc. Species
Patas
0
1
0
0
0
0
61
Couroupita Guianensis
Rohen
0
3
4
0
0
3
62
Misc. Species
Ram Jada
0
0
1
0
0
0
63
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
2
0
0
0
0
64
Misc. Species
Sahaj
0
0
0
1
0
0
65
Shorea Robusta
Sala
2
69
41
40
38
54
66
Lagerstroemia parviflora
Sehna
0
6
6
1
0
0
67
Misc. Species
Sesua
0
0
0
1
0
0
68
Misc. Species
Tad
1
1
0
0
0
0
69
Semecarpus Anacardium
Veluan
0
1
2
0
0
0
70
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asan
0
0
1
0
0
0
71
Buchanania lanzan
Char
1
5
2
2
0
6
72
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
1
0
0
1
0
1
73
Terminalia chebula
Harida
0
1
0
0
0
0
74
Misc. Species
Karla
0
1
3
2
0
0
75
Others
Karma
0
1
3
0
0
0
76
Others
Kure
0
3
1
2
0
0
77
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
1
3
6
0
8
78
Mangifera Indica
Mango
1
0
0
0
0
0
79
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
0
1
0
0
1
80
Butea monosperma
Palasa
0
3
2
3
0
5
81
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
0
0
0
0
23
82
Shorea Robusta
Sala
0
1
3
0
1
1
83
Misc. Species
Seeres
0
0
0
0
0
2
84
Cassia fistula
Sunari
0
2
0
0
0
0
Total
8
413
266
162
96
165
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1110
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Proposed forest land is not vulnerable to erosion. It is almost flat land
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wildlife like Wild boar (Sus scrofa cristatus), Barking deer (Muntiacusm untjack), Black Bear (Melursus ursinus), Jackal (Canisu reus), Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Hare (Lepus nigricollis), and Mongoose (Herpestes edwardi) are seen in the forest land proposed for diversion but their population is very thin. Birds like common doves (Streptopellchin onesies), mynas (Acridotheres tristis), Jungle crow (Corvusm acrohyreos), Indian cuckoo (Eudynamiss colopaclus), Parakeets (Psittacula eupilia), etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
Part of the land proposed for diversion coming under jamankira range at village Ghosragoda lies approximately 5 k.m. away from the boundary of addl. Kansar R.F. of Badrama Sanctuary coming under eco-sensitive zone. The project for laying out of gas pipeline does not have any adverse effect on eco-sensitive zone
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 3. : Deogarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Debgarh
27.533
2
Debgarh
27.533
Total
55.066
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
27.533
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
27.533
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
embelica officinalis
amla
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
Acacia Arabica
Akasi
0
2
1
0
0
0
3
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
18
45
9
1
0
4
Peltoform Pterocarpum
Asan
26
177
100
35
17
8
5
Misc. Species
Babulo
0
12
5
0
1
0
6
Terminalia belerica
Bahada
0
7
4
1
1
1
7
Aegle marmelos
Bela
0
3
0
1
0
0
8
Semecarpus Anacardium
Bhalia
0
18
7
0
0
0
9
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Bija
3
9
9
4
1
0
10
Cassia Fistula
Chakunda
1
29
31
2
1
0
11
Buchanania lanzan
Char
13
145
9
2
0
0
12
Anogeissus latifolia
Dharua
8
58
26
9
2
0
13
Misc. Species
Dhubuni
0
0
0
0
0
1
14
Misc. Species
Drytee
0
0
0
0
1
0
15
Ficus Racemosa
Dumber
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
Gmelin Arborea
Gamher
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Gotikhachaka
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
Sterculia urens
Guhira
0
0
1
0
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Guhuria
0
0
3
0
0
0
20
Misc. Species
Halan
0
3
0
0
0
0
21
Terminalia Chebula
Harida
0
4
6
2
0
0
22
Misc. Species
Jamddi
0
0
1
0
0
0
23
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
1
8
6
3
0
7
24
Misc. Species
Kaha
0
11
5
0
0
1
25
Anacardium Occidentale
Kaju
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
Misc. Species
Karada
0
1
6
1
0
0
27
Misc. Species
Karla
4
52
11
0
0
1
28
Misc. Species
Karma
0
6
3
1
0
1
29
Ziziphus mauritiana
Kasi
0
0
0
1
0
0
30
Acacia Arabica
Kekat
2
10
10
2
5
1
31
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
14
10
13
6
7
32
Misc. Species
Khaes
0
5
3
1
0
1
33
Misc. Species
khaira
0
0
0
1
0
0
34
Misc. Species
Khajur
0
0
8
13
0
0
35
Delonix Regia
Krushnachuda
0
1
0
0
0
1
36
Mallotus philippinensis
Kum
0
5
1
1
0
2
37
Misc. Species
Kurei
1
9
0
0
0
0
38
Schleichera oleosa
Kusum
0
0
0
0
0
5
39
Madhuca indica
Mahul
11
218
92
59
29
66
40
Ochna obtusata
Mai
0
11
3
8
2
1
41
Mangifera Indica
Aamba
0
0
0
2
4
2
42
Misc. Species
Muead
0
11
3
1
0
0
43
Misc. Species
Mutey
0
3
0
0
0
0
44
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
26
16
9
2
5
45
Misc. Species
Orange
0
3
0
0
0
0
46
Butea monosperma
Palsa
0
27
18
6
10
3
47
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Panasa
0
1
5
2
0
8
48
Misc. Species
Patas
3
15
2
1
1
0
49
Psidium Guajava
Pijuli
0
1
1
4
0
0
50
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
1
2
1
0
2
51
Misc. Species
Radhachuda
0
1
3
1
3
0
52
Mallotus philippinensis
Rohen
0
6
0
0
0
0
53
Misc. Species
Ruhan
0
1
0
0
0
0
54
Tectona Grandis
Saguaan
6
25
12
2
0
0
55
Terminalia bellerica
Sahaj
0
1
0
0
0
0
56
Moringa oleifera
Sajana
0
0
0
0
0
1
57
Shorea Robusta
sal
23
469
168
35
8
9
58
Misc. Species
Salia
0
3
0
1
0
1
59
Bombax Ceiba
Semel
0
0
2
1
0
1
60
Couroupita Guianensis
Senha
0
3
1
1
0
0
61
Lagerstroemia parviflora
senha
3
42
11
2
0
0
62
Albezzia Labbeck
Sesua
0
0
0
1
0
0
63
Misc. Species
sidha
4
37
11
2
0
1
64
Misc. Species
sisu
0
1
3
0
0
1
65
Cassia fistula
Sunari
0
2
1
0
0
0
66
Misc. Species
sunari
0
0
2
0
0
0
67
Borasis Flebilifer
Tad
0
0
0
1
9
12
68
Misc. Species
tal
0
0
0
1
1
0
69
Tamarindus indicus
Tentuli
0
0
0
0
0
3
70
Misc. Species
unknow
3
6
3
1
1
2
71
Misc. Species
Veru
0
25
5
4
4
0
72
Misc. Species
Mutey
0
3
0
0
0
0
Total
113
1551
676
249
110
156
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
2855
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The present proposal is for laying of underground natural gas pipeline along with Optical Fiber Cable (OFC) fromBokaro to Angul (Odisha section). The Bokaro-Angul Natural gas pipel
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 4. : Jharsuguda
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Jharsuguda
0.7705
Total
0.7705
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.7705
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
0.7705
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Auriculiformis
Akari
0
1
4
2
0
0
2
Terminalia arjuna
Arjun
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Asana
2
9
1
2
0
0
4
Madhuca indica
Mahula
0
0
2
2
0
1
5
Butea monosperma
Palasa
0
7
1
0
0
0
6
Eucalyptus
Patas
0
0
0
0
1
1
7
Psidium Guajava
Pijuli
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Shorea Robusta
Sala
0
0
1
1
1
0
Total
2
19
9
7
2
2
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
41
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
All the forest land involved in this project are plain land & not affected soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
Adjoining to the Proposed Jagadishpur- Haldia- Bok
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Frequently wild elephant movement are noticed. The wildlife noticed in the area are Wildlife like Hanuman (Presbytis entlellus entellus), Odha (Lutra perspicillata perspicillata), Gunduchi musa (Funambulus Pennanti) and Musa (Rattus rattus rufescens) are seen in the forest land proposed for diversion but their population is very thin. Birds like Tentei (anellus malabaricus) Koili (Eudynamys scolopacea scolopacea), Kubhati (Centropus sinensis Parroti), Kopata (Streptopelia decaocto), Damara Kua (Curvas macrohyachos culmintatus) etc are seen. Common reptiles and lizards like Dhandasapa (Enhydris enhydris), Dhamana Sapa (Elephe radiata), Chitti Sapa (Dendrelaphis ahaetulla), Naga Sapa (Naga naja kothia)..
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 5. : Rairakhol
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Sambalpur
7.2598
Total
7.2598
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
7.2598
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
7.2598
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
Pterocarpus marsupium
Asana
0
2
10
6
2
0
3
Terminalia belerica
Bahada
0
4
0
1
0
0
4
Butea monosperma
Ban Palasa
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
Ficus Bengalensis
Bara
0
1
0
0
1
0
6
Aegle marmelos
Bela
0
2
0
0
0
0
7
Chloroxylon swietenia
Bheru
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Bija
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
Buchanania lanzan
Char
0
10
4
0
0
0
10
Anogeissus latifolia
Dharua
0
4
3
0
2
0
11
Ficus Racemosa
Dimiri
0
0
1
0
0
0
12
Acacia leucophlaea
Gohira
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Holoptelia integrifolia
Gringel
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
Terminalia Chebula
Harida
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Cleistanthus collinus
Karada
0
1
0
0
0
0
16
Cassia fistula
Kasi
2
2
1
0
1
0
17
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
5
2
2
3
4
18
Acacia catechu
Khaira
0
0
0
0
0
1
19
Phoebe Attenuata Nees.
Khajuri
0
0
0
10
1
0
20
Adina cordifolia
kuruma
0
1
0
0
0
0
21
Careya arborea
Kumbhi
0
1
0
0
0
0
22
Azadirachta indica
neem
0
0
2
2
2
1
23
Lannea coromandelica
Mai
0
6
11
4
1
2
24
Madhuca indica
Mahul
0
15
20
16
13
24
25
Mangifera Indica
Amba
0
0
4
0
0
1
26
Mitragyna parvifolia
Mundi
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
Butea monosperma
Palasa
0
4
12
5
1
1
28
Lagerstroemia speciosa
Patuli
0
0
0
0
0
1
29
Soymida febrifuga
Rohini
0
0
0
1
0
0
30
Bursera serrata
Rajmohi
0
0
0
0
0
1
31
Soymida febrifuga
Rohini
0
0
1
0
0
0
32
Tectona Grandis
Teak
1
2
0
0
0
0
33
Streblus asper
Sahada
0
1
2
0
0
1
34
Shorea Robusta
Sal
0
33
11
7
7
2
35
Pterospermum Acerifolia
Sapuri
0
0
1
0
0
0
36
Couroupita Guianensis
Shena
0
1
0
0
0
0
37
Lagerstroemia parviflora
Sidha
0
4
4
3
0
0
38
Borasis Flebilifer
Tala
0
3
1
0
0
0
39
Tamarindus Indica
Tentuli
0
3
1
0
0
0
40
Chloroxylon swietenia
Bheru
0
1
0
2
0
0
Total
3
114
91
59
35
42
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
344
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
7.2598
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
10
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
2
3
4
Division 6. : Rourkela
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.4062
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
3.4062
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
156
21
0
0
0
0
Total
156
21
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
177
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
GAIL (India) Limited, India's principal Gas Transmission and Marketing Company, was set up by the Government of India in August 1984 to create gas sector infrastructure for sustain
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Presence of wild animals is occasional seen. Wildlife like Wild boar (Sus scrofa cristatus), Barking deer (Muntiacusm untjack), Black Bear (Melursus ursinus), Jackal (Canisu reus), Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Hare (Lepus nigricollis), and Mongoose (Herpestes edwardi) are seen in the forest land proposed for diversion but their population is very thin. Birds like common doves (Streptopellchin onesies), mynas (Acridotheres tristis), Jungle crow (Corvusm acrohyreos), Indian cuckoo (Eudynamiss colopaclus), Parakeets (Psittacula eupilia), etc are seen. Common reptiles and lizards like Indian cobra (Najanaja, Common krait (Bungarus cacruleus), rat snakes (Ptyas mucosus), common garden lizards (Calotesver sicolor)etc are seen in the area.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 7. : Sundargarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Sundargarh
1.0948
Total
1.0948
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.0948
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
1.0948
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Arabica
Acasia
10
44
11
4
0
0
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Sahaj
0
0
1
2
0
0
3
Shorea robusta
Sal
0
7
16
11
3
0
Total
10
51
28
17
3
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
109
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
GAIL (India) Limited, India's principal Gas Transmission and Marketing Company, was set up by the Government of India in August 1984 to create gas sector infrastructure for sustain
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
121
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Presence of wild animals is occasionally seen. Wildlife like Wild boar (Sus scrofa cristatus), Barking deer (Muntiacusm untjack), Black Bear (Melursus ursinus), Jackal (Canisu reus), Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Hare (Lepus nigricollis), and Mongoose (Herpestes edwardi) are seen in the forest land proposed for diversion, but their population is very thin. Birds like common doves (Streptopellchin onesies), mynas (Acridotheres tristis), Jungle crow (Corvusm acrohyreos), Indian cuckoo (Eudynamiss colopaclus), Parakeets (Psittacula eupilia), etc are seen. Common reptiles and lizards like Indian cobra (Najanaja, Common krait (Bungarus cacruleus), rat snakes (Ptyas mucosus), common garden lizards (Calotesver sicolor) etc are seen in the area.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
The proposal may be recommended for onward transmission to higher quarter
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Sambalpur
665700
363177
892.0139
23
115.4776
31/03/2017
0
115.4776
2
Sundargarh
277700
108389.77
3193.722
15
789.69
30/01/2021
108389.77
533.21
3
Sundargarh
971200
171225
171225
80
0
31/12/2020
10354.622
1651.911
4
Anugul
637500
271682
4439.229
60
2437.81
31/01/2021
1339.43
953.9
5
Debgarh
2940.0
1550.907
229.963
9
44.892
08/06/2017
341.42
929.09
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Rairakhol
Sambalpur
DFO
Yes
One
07/02/2021
Angul
Angul
DFO
Yes
One
11/02/2021
Jharsuguda
Sambalpur
DFO
Yes
One
14/02/2021
Bamra WL
Sambalpur
DFO
Yes
One
09/02/2021
Sundargarh
Rourkela
DFO
Yes
One
18/02/2021
Rourkela
Rourkela
DFO
Yes
One
19/02/2021
Deogarh
Rourkela
DFO
Yes
Four
09/02/2021,10/02/2021,19/02/2021,20/02/2021
Sambalpur
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Rairakhol
Sambalpur
DFO
Recommended
The criteria for route ion are • Optimum distance between source of supply and consumer location demand points • Avoidance of Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest, Mining area and Defense establishment to the best possible. • Avoidance rocky marshy and low lying areas • Safety of people and environment • Easy access to route during construction and operation. The route was ed based on least disturbance to environment, forest, human habitation and aquatic bodies. It avoids National Parks and Wild Life Sanctuaries. The ed route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply source and consumer location.
Angul
Angul
DFO
Recommended
Recommendation for Acceptance
Jharsuguda
Sambalpur
DFO
Recommended
The ed route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply source and consumer location
Bamra WL
Sambalpur
DFO
Recommended
The criteria for route ion are • Optimum distance between source of supply and consumer location demand points • Avoidance of Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest, Mining area and Defense establishment to the best possible. • Avoidance rocky marshy and low lying areas • Safety of people and environment • Easy access to route during construction and operation. The route was ed based on least disturbance to environment, forest, human habitation and aquatic bodies. It avoids National Parks and Wild Life Sanctuaries.
Sundargarh
Rourkela
DFO
Recommended
The criteria for route ion are • Optimum distance between source of supply and consumer location demand points • Avoidance of Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest, Mining area and Defense establishment to the best possible. • Avoidance of rocky marshy and low lying areas • Safety of people and environment • Easy access to route during construction and operation. The route was ed based on least disturbance to environment, forest, human habitation and aquatic bodies. It avoids National Parks and Wild Life Sanctuaries. The ed route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply source and consumer location.
Rourkela
Rourkela
DFO
Recommended
The criteria for route ion are • Optimum distance between source of supply and consumer location demand points • Avoidance of Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest, Mining area and Defense establishment to the best possible. • Avoidance rocky marshy and low lying areas • Safety of people and environment • Easy access to route during construction and operation. The route was ed based on least disturbance to environment, forest, human habitation and aquatic bodies. It avoids National Parks and Wild Life Sanctuaries. The ed route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply source and consumer location.
Deogarh
Rourkela
DFO
Recommended
The criteria for route ion are • Optimum distance between source of supply and consumer location demand points • Avoidance of Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest, Mining area and Defense establishment to the best possible. • Avoidance rocky marshy and low lying areas • Safety of people and environment • Easy access to route during construction and operation. The route was ed based on least disturbance to environment, forest, human habitation and aquatic bodies. It avoids National Parks and Wild Life Sanctuaries. The ed route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply source and consumer location.
Rourkela
CF
Recommended
Gas Pipe line Project By JHBDPL Phase II Odisha
Yes
Angul
CF
Recommended
Diversion of 10.7726 ha of forest land for laying of natural gas pipeline along with optical fiber cable by GAIL India Ltd. forwarded
Yes
Sambalpur
CF
Recommended
It is justified for laying of gas pipeline.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Looking into the above, it is imperative for JHDPL natural gas pipeline passing in Odisha in Alternative 1 is more apt technically and safety in comparison to the other two alternative viz. Alternative 2 and Alternative 3
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Orissa
State Secretary
Recommended
16/03/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Bhubaneswar
Regional Office
5-ORA456/2021-BHU
30/03/2021
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/OR/Others/46243/2020
OTHERS462432020387
84,046,201.00
84,046,201.00
2021-05-04
ICIC512300422452
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2021-04-28
2021-04-30
FP/OR/Others/46243/2020
OTHERS462432020840
182,700.00
182,700.00
2021-08-19
000107564757
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2021-08-12
2021-08-17
FP/OR/Others/46243/2020
OTHERS462432020429
409,894,000.00
409,894,000.00
2021-09-07
SBIN924941013202
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2021-08-28
2021-09-03
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/OR/Others/46243/2020
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×