PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
OR-084/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Orissa
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Orissa
(ii)
District :
Anugul,Dhenkanal,Cuttack,Khordha ,Nayagarh
(iii)
Forest Division :
Angul,Dhenkanal,Athagarh,Khurda,Nayagarh
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
6.1487
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Others
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Nayagarh
0.6266
Revenue Forest
2
Khurda
0.0728
Revenue Forest
3
Athagarh
0.365
Reserved Forest
4
Athagarh
0.9325
Revenue Forest
5
Ghumusur South
1.8357
Revenue Forest
6
Parlakhemundi
0.0021
Revenue Forest
7
Berhampur
0
Revenue Non Forest Land
8
Dhenkanal
2.314
Revenue Forest
9
Angul
0
Reserved Forest
Total
6.1487
Division 1. : Angul
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Anugul
0
Total
0
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0
0
Eco 6
Total.
0
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Abies Alba
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
0
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
NA
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Elephant,Wild Boar ,Barking Deer ,Indian Hare ,Langur ,Jackal Indian penfowl ,Blue jay ,Egretta ,Kingfisher,Drongo
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV
2
Authorization_Letter
3
CA_Undertaking
4
Elephant_Movement_Map
5
Land_Schedule
6
Note_On_Project
7
Part-II
8
Site_Inspection_Report
9
Site_Specific_Wildlife_Conseration_Plan013
10
State_Polution_control_board-Undertaking
11
TopoMap
12
Tree_Enumuration_List
13
Undertaking011
14
Undertaking-2012
15
Topo_Map_1
16
Cost_of_Compensatory_afforestation
17
FRA_Undertaking
18
Justification
19
Layout_Plan
20
Certificate_of_Minimum_Use_land
21
Check_List
22
Regional_Wildlife_Management_Plan014
23
Form_A_Part-1
Division 2. : Athagarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Cuttack
1.2975
Total
1.2975
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.2975
0.1
Eco 2
Total.
1.2975
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Panasha
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
Moringa oleifera
Sajana
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
Samania Saman
Chakunda
0
12
15
18
0
35
4
Anacardium Occidentale
Kaju
0
13
18
6
0
0
5
Casurina Equisitifolia
Jahun
0
0
1
4
3
0
6
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
10
5
1
0
0
7
Buchanania lanzan
Chara
0
2
0
0
0
0
8
Syzigium Cumini
Jamu
0
2
2
3
0
0
9
Pongamia pinnata
Karanja
0
0
1
0
0
0
10
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
0
0
2
11
Acacia Auricuiformis
Acacia
0
1
1
0
1
0
12
Lannea coromandelica
Mai
0
0
1
0
0
0
13
Others
Misc
0
2
1
0
0
0
Total
0
43
46
32
4
38
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
163
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land applied for diversion is not vulnerable to erosion and also does not form a part of severely eroded area.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.59
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
House crow, Black Drongo, Indian hare, Leopard, Indian Elephant, Owl, Rat, Rabit Monkey etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Division 3. : Berhampur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ganjam
0
Total
0
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0
0
Eco 3
Total.
0
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Cassia siamea
chakunda
0
13
8
4
1
8
2
Anogeissus acuminata
phasi
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
Others
SIMAKAIAN
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
Tamarindus indica
kaian
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
Acacia nilotica
babul
0
7
3
0
0
0
6
Morinda tinctoria
achu
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
Tectona grandis
saguan
0
17
1
0
0
0
8
Azadirachta indica
neem
0
1
2
0
0
0
9
Dalbergia sisoo
sisu
0
1
2
0
0
0
10
Others
blackboard
0
4
2
0
0
0
11
Anthocephalus cadamba
kadamba
0
0
5
1
0
1
12
Syzygium cumini
jamu
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Delonix Regia
krushnachuda
0
3
5
0
0
0
Total
0
49
30
7
1
9
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
96
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No forest land is involved in the Project Pertaining to Berhampur Forest Division. Total- 103.4171 Ha. of Non Forest Area is involved in the project.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
5.0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part-II, Site Inspection, Recommendation.
Division 4. : Dhenkanal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Dhenkanal
2.314
Total
2.314
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.314
40
Eco 3
Total.
2.314
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
9
55
3
2
0
0
2
Shorea Robusta
Sala
1
137
6
3
1
0
3
Syzigium Jambous
Jammu
0
3
4
1
1
0
4
Buchanania lanzan
Chara
0
56
0
0
0
0
5
Chloroxylon swietenia
Bheru
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
Pterocarpus marsupium
Asan
2
23
11
7
2
0
7
Xylia xylocarpa
Kangada
1
6
0
0
0
0
8
Albizzia lebbeck
Sirisa
0
2
2
0
0
0
9
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
7
2
0
0
0
10
Madhuka Indica
Mahula
0
13
5
3
0
0
11
Bombax Ceiba
Simili
0
0
0
1
0
0
12
Lannea coromandelica
Moi
1
13
2
2
0
0
13
Grewia Tiliaefolia
Dhaman
0
4
0
0
0
0
14
Prasophis sinereria
Gohira
1
5
7
5
2
0
15
Careya arborea
Kumbha
0
1
0
0
0
0
16
Bridelia retusa
Kasi
0
12
2
0
0
0
17
Cassia fistula
Sunari
0
2
0
0
0
0
18
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
4
1
1
0
0
19
Semecarpus Anacardium
Bhalia
0
1
1
0
0
0
20
Albezzia Labbeck
Khaira
0
1
0
0
0
0
21
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
1
0
0
0
0
22
Cleistanthus collinus
Koroda
0
9
0
0
0
0
23
Butea monosperma
Palasa
1
0
0
0
0
0
24
Anacardium Occidentale
Kaju
0
1
0
0
0
0
25
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
1
2
8
26
Limonia acidissima
Kaitha
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
Alangium Lamarckit
Ankula
0
1
0
0
0
0
28
Gmelina arborea
Gambhari
0
1
0
0
0
0
29
Aegle Marmelos
Bela
2
7
1
0
0
0
30
Dalbergia sisoo
Sissoo
0
1
1
0
0
0
31
Schleichera oleosa
Kusuma
0
0
1
0
0
0
32
Casearia elliptica
Khakada
1
0
0
0
0
0
33
Bambusa Bamboo
kanta Baunsa
179
0
0
0
0
0
34
Ficus Bengalensis
Bara
0
0
0
0
0
1
Total
198
368
49
26
8
9
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
658
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Iswarpal village forest has continuous Presence of wildlife such as elephant, barking deer, wild boar, Cheetal etc. Ther is no sign for wildlife in other villages.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
11973600
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Suitable certificate of CA Land by DFO, Dhenkanal
Division 5. : Ghumusur South
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ganjam
1.8357
Total
1.8357
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.8357
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
1.8357
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Azadirachta indica
Neem
2
18
6
1
0
0
2
Lannea coromandelica
Mai
0
2
1
1
0
0
3
Tectona grandis
Saguan
1
13
4
2
0
0
4
Ficus bengalensis
Bara
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
Schleichera oleosa
Kusuma
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
Cassia siamea
Chakundi
0
20
5
3
0
3
7
Acacia nilotica
Babul
0
2
5
1
1
0
8
Acacia catechu
Khaiasa
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
Polyainthia Longifolia
Devdaru
0
2
0
0
0
0
10
Terminalia bellerica
Bahada
1
11
7
1
0
1
11
Acacia auriculaeformis
Akashia
0
3
0
1
0
0
12
Morinda tinctoria
Achu
1
6
0
1
0
0
13
Syzigium Cumini
Jamu
1
9
0
1
0
0
14
Alangium Lamarckit
Ankula
0
1
1
0
0
0
15
Shorea robusta
Sala
1
104
11
2
1
0
16
Mangifera indica
Mango
2
5
1
0
0
2
17
Psidium Guajava
Pijuli
1
2
0
0
0
0
18
Ficus Infectoria
Jari
0
0
1
0
0
0
19
Gmelina arborea
Gambharia
2
2
0
0
0
0
20
Bombax ceiba
Simili
1
2
1
0
0
1
21
Ficus Racemosa
Dimiri
0
6
0
0
0
0
22
Sesabania Bispinosa
Jayanti
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
Delonix Regia
Krushnachuda
0
9
0
0
0
0
24
Anogeissus latifolia
Dhaura
0
5
1
0
0
0
25
Bombax ceiba
Tula
0
2
0
0
0
0
26
Diospyros melanoxylon
Kendu
0
3
0
0
0
0
27
Anogeissus acuminata
Phasi
0
2
2
1
0
1
28
Bombax ceiba
Simakaian
0
1
3
0
0
0
29
Butea monosperma
Palasa
0
1
0
0
0
0
30
Ficus religiosa
Aswastha
0
1
0
1
0
0
31
Gmelina arborea
Gambhar
0
0
0
1
0
0
32
Polyainthia Longifolia
Debadaru
0
0
1
0
0
0
33
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Panas
0
1
0
0
0
0
34
Ficus bengalensis
bara
0
1
0
0
0
0
35
Eucalyptus spp
Eucalyptus
4
4
0
0
0
0
36
Madhuca indica
Mahua
0
6
0
0
0
0
37
Dalbergia sisoo
Sisoo
1
1
4
1
0
1
38
Acacia auriculaeformis
Acacia
0
3
3
1
0
0
39
Buchanania lanzan
Chara
0
4
0
0
0
0
40
Mallotus philippinensis
Rohini
0
12
5
0
1
0
41
Chloroxylon swietenia
Bheru
0
1
0
0
0
0
42
Azadirachta indica
Neemba
0
2
1
0
0
0
43
Tamarindus indica
Tentuli
0
0
1
0
0
0
44
Cleistanthus collinus
Karada
0
1
0
0
0
0
45
Prasophis sinereria
Gohira
0
1
0
0
0
0
46
Pongamia Pinnata
Karanja
0
1
0
0
0
0
47
Bamboo
Bamboo
1
0
0
0
0
0
48
Others
Nadia
0
0
0
0
1
0
49
Others
Malati
0
1
0
0
0
0
50
Others
Banakahadi
0
0
0
1
0
0
51
Others
Simakan
0
0
1
0
0
0
52
Others
Narakoli
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
19
272
70
20
4
10
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
395
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
No prescription
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Proposed forest land is not vulnerable to erosion. it is almost flat land.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
10
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
presence of wild animals is negligible. Wild Elephant, Black buck, Wild Boar, Barking Deer, Jackal, Bison, Doves, Mynas, Jungle Crow, Rat Snakes, Indian Cobra, garden lizard.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Forwarding Letter, Part-II & Site Inspection Report
Division 6. : Khurda
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Khordha
0.0728
Total
0.0728
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.0728
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
0.0728
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Azadirachta indica
At- Puania village of Bolagarh tehsil of Khordha district.
0
0
90
0
0
0
Total
0
0
90
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
90
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
2
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 7. : Nayagarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.6266
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
0.6266
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Syzigium Jambous
Jamu
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
Gmelina Arborea
Gambhari
0
2
0
1
0
0
4
Syzygium cumini
Jamun
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
Delonix Regia
Krusnchuda
0
0
2
1
1
0
6
Others
Mai
0
0
0
1
0
0
7
Others
Chakunda
0
1
3
2
2
0
8
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
1
1
0
0
0
9
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
1
2
0
0
0
10
Anogeissus latifolia
Phasi
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Lagerstroemia speciosa
patuli
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Bombax Ceiba
simili
0
0
1
0
0
0
13
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
1
2
0
0
0
14
Others
mai
0
0
0
0
1
0
15
Others
Babul
0
2
3
0
4
0
16
Others
Chkunda
1
6
4
1
0
5
17
Dalbergia sisoo
sisoo
0
1
1
1
0
0
18
Peltoform Pterocarpum
Radhachuda
0
1
5
3
0
1
19
Azadirachta indica
Neem
0
12
5
0
0
0
20
Delonix Regia
krushnchuda
0
1
0
1
0
0
21
Lagerstroemia speciosa
Maheswar queen
0
1
0
1
0
0
22
Holoptelea integrifolia
Dhauranja
0
0
0
1
0
0
23
Limonia acidissima
kaitha
0
0
0
1
0
0
24
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
1
0
0
0
0
25
Gmelin Arborea
Gambhari
0
4
0
0
0
0
26
Anogeissus latifolia
Phasi
0
3
1
0
1
0
27
Others
Mitikiria
0
0
1
0
0
0
28
Acacia Auriculiformis
accasia
0
1
0
0
0
0
29
Tectona Grandis
Saguan
0
16
5
2
0
0
30
Cassia fistula
Sunari
0
2
1
0
0
0
31
Albizzia lebbeck
Sirisa
0
1
2
0
0
0
32
Bombax Ceiba
Simili
0
3
3
1
0
0
33
Others
Mundik
0
0
0
1
0
0
34
Others
kasi katha
0
1
0
0
0
0
35
Morinda tinctoria
achu
0
1
0
0
0
0
36
Others
Ankula
0
3
0
0
0
0
37
Polyainthia Longifolia
Debadaru
0
0
0
1
0
0
Total
1
70
43
21
9
6
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
150
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
FC Act, 1980
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Proposed Forest land is not vulnerable to erosion. It is almost flat land
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
06
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wild boar, Barking deer, Jackal, Hare and Bison occasionally movement in the forest land proposed for diversion but their population is very thin.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
No
S.No.
Component
Forest Area(in ha.)
NO Data
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
2
3
Division 8. : Parlakhemundi
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Gajapati
0.0021
Total
0.0021
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.0021
0.1
Eco 3
Total.
0.0021
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Cassia Siamea
Chakunda
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
0
0
1
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nil
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Proposed forest land is not vulnerable to erosion. It is almost flat land.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
5.2
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Elephant, Barking Deer, Jackal, Bison, Mynas, Jungle Crow, Indian Cuckoo, Parakeets , Indian cobra, rat Snakes, Garden Lizards.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part- II, site inspection, Recommendation.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Cuttack
659700
58562.035
393.4703
11
494.04
30/06/2022
494.04
156.69
2
Dhenkanal
459800
178820.75
2012.7278
24
3713.970
31/12/2021
3335.440
1031.3356
3
Anugul
637500
271682
5243.232327
65
2437.81
30/09/2022
1339.43
953.9
4
Khordha
0.355358
57892.53
180.6375
18
222.966
30/09/2022
222.966
222.966
5
Ganjam
281875
111748
277.777
7
277.777
19/10/2022
277.777
0
6
Ganjam
820600
196500
402.6758
10
32.688
20/10/2022
42.688
424.3079
7
Gajapati
455200
249972.5
336.8781
06
358.8631
21/10/2022
358.8631
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Athagarh
Angul
DFO
Yes
One
17/09/2022
Dhenkanal
Angul
DFO
Yes
One
12/09/2022
Khurda
Bhubaneswar
DFO
Yes
One
26/09/2022
Nayagarh
Bhubaneswar
DFO
Yes
One
19/09/2022
Angul
Angul
DFO
Yes
One
18/11/2022
Berhampur
Berhampur
DFO
Yes
One
22/09/2022
Ghumusur South
Berhampur
DFO
Yes
One
26/09/2022
Parlakhemundi
Berhampur
DFO
Yes
One
23/09/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Athagarh
Angul
DFO
Recommended
During site visit by the undersigned it is ascertained that the User Agency has not any construction work of the above Forest land proposed for diversion.
Dhenkanal
Angul
DFO
Recommended
The gas pipe line is a critical infrastructure connecting various RLNG terminal like Dhamara, Dahej etc. and domestic Gas fills of kg basin to customers in Eastern Region and Southern Region.
Khurda
Bhubaneswar
DFO
Recommended
Diversion of 0.0728 ha. forest land for lying of underground Natural Gas Pipeline along with Optical Fibre Cable from Srikakulam Angul Pipeline. The Srikakulam Angul Pipeline, SAPL, Odisha of GAIL Inia Ltd. is proposed in such a way so as to minimise requirement of forest land. The forest land proposed for diversion is barest minimum required and only one tree is to be felled from the forest land. The proposal for diversion of forest land for the project is hereby recommended
Nayagarh
Bhubaneswar
DFO
Recommended
The Srikakulam Angul Pipeline SAPL , Odisha Gail India Limited have been done in the forest land in such a way so as to minimize requirement of forest land. The project is required the following Revenue Forest Area patches for its necessary infrastructure facilities. The forest land proposed for diversion is the brest minimum required for the project. The proposal for diversion of ha. of forest land for the project is recomended.
Angul
Angul
DFO
Recommended
1.Site specific management plan 2.Measures Should be taken mitigate possibility of pipe line becoming physical barrier during construction phase.
Berhampur
Berhampur
DFO
Recommended
As no forestland is involved in this project and there is less impact to the flora and fauna due to the project, it is recommended for diversion of Forestland for non forestry use
Ghumusur South
Berhampur
DFO
Recommended
Diversion of 0.0728 ha. forest land for lying of underground Natural Gas Pipeline along with Optical Fibre Cable from Srikakulam Angul Pipeline. The Srikakulam Angul Pipeline, SAPL, Odisha of GAIL Inia Ltd. is proposed in such a way so as to minimise requirement of forest land. The proposal for diversion of forest land for the project is hereby recommended.
Parlakhemundi
Berhampur
DFO
Recommended
Only 0.0021 ha og Gramya Jungle is invloed in this project and there is no impact to flora and fauna due to this project. Hence, it is recommended for diversion of forestland for non forestry use.
Bhubaneswar
CF
Recommended
DFO, Khordha FOrest DIvision along with Part III detail site inspection note duly filled in is enclosed herewith may be forwarded to PCCF
Yes
Berhampur
CF
Recommended
Natural Gas pipe line along with OFC from Srikakulam Andhra Pradesh Anugul Odisha Pipe Line
Yes
Angul
CF
Recommended
The proposal in respect of Athgarh Dehnkanal Division forwarded for acceptance
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended for diversion of 6.1487 ha of forest land for laying of underground Natural Gas Pipeline along with Optical Fibre Cable of Srikakulum Angul Natural Gas Pipeline Odisha Section under Angul, Dhenkanal, Athagarh, Khordha, Nayagarh, Ghumsur South, Berhampur and Paralakhemundi Forest Divisions of Odisha Divisions of Odisha by GAIL India ltd. for approval under Section 2 ii of FC Act, 1980.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Orissa
State Secretary
Recommended
21/01/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Bhubaneswar
Regional Office
5-ORC548/2023-BHU
17/02/2023
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
OTHERS1474452021303
13,306,907.00
13,306,907.00
2023-03-23
911856
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2023-03-15
2023-03-17
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
OTHERS1474452021848
1,758,197.00
1,758,197.00
2023-04-03
918273
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2023-03-28
2023-03-30
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
OTHERS1474452021139
2,011.00
2,011.00
2023-05-19
952865
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2023-04-21
2023-04-27
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
12.523
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
10
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
1
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
12.523
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Degraded Forest land selected for Compensatory Afforestation: 12.523 ha. at Kapilash R.F. under Sadangi Range of Dhenkanal Forest Division
Location Details :
Kapilash R.F. in Sadangi Range of Dhenkanal Forest Division
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Kapilash R.F.
RF
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
10 Apr 2023
No Data
verified
21.
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Uploaded Letter
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
03 Feb 2025
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency(old)
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Reject Remarks
Reject Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
14 Aug 2024
EDS: Please furnish compliance to the observation raised by GoI, MoEF&CC, New Delhi on dated 28.08.2024.
03 Jan 2025
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
The compliance to the conditions imposed by GoI MoEF & CC RO BBSR as well as State Govt. is sent herewith vide this office letter No.14440 dated 23.07.2024 for according final approval.
17 Aug 2024
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/OR/Others/147445/2021
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×