PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : OR-061/2016
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Orissa
 (i) State / Union Territory : Orissa  (ii) District : Jajpur  (iii) Forest Division : Cuttack  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 17.14  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Mining
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Cuttack17.14Revenue Forest
Total 17.14
Division 1. : Cuttack
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Jajapur17.14
Total17.14
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
117.140.4Eco 1
Total. 17.14


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Acacia auriculaeformisAcasia012531950
2Terminalia arjunaArjuna013312
3Terminalia tomentosaAsan009668
4Terminalia bellericaBahada001212
5Ficus religiosaAswastha000022
6Ficus bengalensisBara000001
7OthersBatara020000
8Semecarpus anacardiumBhalia001111
9C.SiamiaChakunda09936300
10Buchanania lanzanChara022200
11Alstonia scholarisChatian011001
12Anogeissus latifoliaDhaura001102
13Holoptelia integrifoliaDhauranga011000
14OthersDimiri001100
15OthersGiringa010000
16Terminalia chebulaHarida000010
17Syzigium CuminiJamun001004
18OthersKashi010000
19Diasporus MelanoxylonKendu000037
20OthersKumbhi000100
21Schleichera oleosaKusuma000014
22Ailanthus excelsaMahaneem000100
23Madhuca indicaMahula0107417
24Mangifera indicaMango000012
25OthersMisc.010022
26Azadirachta IndicaNeem0245200
27Butea monospermaPalas001010
28OthersPiasal010100
29OthersRadhachuda000001
30Shorea robustaSal0330518
31Dalbergia sisoosisoo000101
32OthersTentala020000
33Tamarindus indicaTentuli000005
Total 0 152119 5134 80
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 436


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The area has not been included within the prescription of Working plan.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed site is not vulnerable to erosion and do not form a part of severely eroded area.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Elephant, Pangolin, Mongoose, Macaque, Squirrel, Porcupine, Barking Deer, Wild Boar, Bengal Monitor Lizard, Common Cobra, Chameleon, Python, Common Krait, Vipers, , Ratels, Jungle Cat, Indian Fox,, Hy
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1JajpurAnjira7.4Khata No.1729/Plot No. 5839/ Kisam -Pahar
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Jajpur289900725273743.976252452.44131/12/20152130.2392457.862
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
CuttackAngulDFOYesOne28/07/2016
 AngulCFNoNo Data
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
CuttackAngulDFO RecommendedThe geological survey of India has identified and establish that the area of Sukinda Valley contents 96% of Chromite deposits of the country. The instant proposed project area is also. The Chromite storage from the project will be used for captive as well as non-captive purpose. So the location of the project that is Saruabil Cromite Mines of M/s Misrilall Mines (P) Ltd. is necessitated or its mining operation over the forest land in Sukinda Valley.
AngulCF Recommended
quetiapin ritalin markenavntablet.site quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended for diversion of 17.14 ha of non-forest land recorded as " Forest " as on 25.10.1980, within the mining lease of Saruabil Chromite Mines of Misrilal Mines (P) Ltd. in village Saruabil, Talangi & Kamarda under Sukinda Tahasil in Jajpur District, Odisha of Cuttack Forest Division under Section 2 (ii) of FC Act, 1980 (Ammended)
quetiapin ritalin quetiapin und valdoxan quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
OrissaState SecretaryRecommended08/11/2016recommended vide letter no 20521 dated 07.11.2016 State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
BhubaneswarHead Office8-100/1997-FC (Vol.)22/06/2018
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/OR/MIN/18303/2016ClosedNo Data