PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : OR-060/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Orissa
 (i) State / Union Territory : Orissa  (ii) District : Anugul  (iii) Forest Division : Angul  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 57.73  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Mining
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Angul1.25Revenue Forest
2Angul43.39District Level Committee (D.L.C.) Forest
3Angul13.09Look alike Forest
Total 57.73
Division 1. : Angul
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Anugul57.73
Total57.73
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
157.730.35Eco 3
Total. 57.73


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Shorea RobustaSal035789255613051
2Azadirachta indicaNeem0218401
3Buchanania lanzanChara075431020
4Madhuca indicaMahula0255371762
5Cassia FistulaSunari021000
6Terminalia BellaricaBahada0129601
7Tamarindus indicaTentuli000100
8Diasporus MelanoxylonKendu0389463279
9Pongamia pinnataKaranja000100
10Butea monospermaPalas022110
11Delonix RegiaKrushnachuda002000
12Acacia auriculaeformisAcacia002000
13Ficus RacemosaArjuna001000
14Mangifera IndicaMango0296439
15Lannea coromandelicaMai063100
16Terminalia ChebulaHarida074101
17Mimusops ElengiBaula0309100
18Ficus BengalensisBara002215
19Pterocarpus MarsupiumPiyasaal00936719
20Dalbergia sisooSissoo001000
21Aegle MarmelosBela052200
22Careya arboreaKumbhaye084310
23Casearia ellipticaKhakada033000
24Lagerstroemia parvifloraSidha023210
25Psidium GuajavaJamun01417525
26Anogeissus latifoliaDhaura021110
27Anacardium OccidentaleValia0143000
28Pterocarpus MarsupiumAsana027392741
29Misc. SpeciesMiscellaneous species0116200
Total 0 6631174 768198 194
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 2997


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Area to be diverted is mainly prone to sheet erosion and at some place gully erosion. (Enclosure-I)- Diversion of Bangaru Jhar Nallah.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 8
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Wild Boar (Susscrofa),Barking Deer (Muntiacus),Indian Hare Leporidae)Elephant (Elephant maximus)Langur(Semnopithecus)Jackal (Canisaureus)Pea fowl (Pavocristatus) Indian Roller (Coracias benghalensis)Cattle Egret (Bubulsus ibis)Common Kingfisher (Alceo atthis)Drongo (Dicrurusadsimilis)
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 550.53138
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1143.519Sunajhari RFBhuban6    View file
2272.462Ramei RFSadangi2    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Details of Non forest Area-62
2 EC-184
3 EDS Reply 424-426
4 Gazette-9-1-252-275
5 CBA-190-192
6 CTO-189
7 Details of Safety zone-406
8 Plate-VII-Already diverted forest
9 Checklist-1-14
10 Detailed note-52-57
11 FC compliance-412-423
12 Land schedule forest-59-61
13 Abstract Tree Enumeration-Forest land
14 Project Approval-15-16
15 R&R Plan-193-203
16 CA Land Suitable_Certificate
17 Topo map CA-153
18 CA Sadangi Plate-IV
19 DGPS composite map-Plate-I
20 DGPS surveyed ML Boundary-Plate-III
21 Plate-IX-DGPS Vilg Khajuria
22 Plate-VI-ACA
23 Plate-VIII-Land use plan
24 Plate-V-Phased reclamation plan
25 Plate-XIV-DGPS Vilg Danara
26 Plate-XV-DGPS Vilg Niladripur
27 RR-1
28 Toposheet-Plate-II
29 Authorization-17-18
30 Certifucate Total Area Involved-63
31 Part-I Signed 19-26
32 Part-II of DFO
33 CA_DGPS
34 Plate-XIII-DGPS Vilg Nakeipasi-II
35 Plate-XVI-DGPS Vilg Solada
36 Plate-XVII-DGPS Vilg Satyabadipur
37 Plate-XVIII-DGPS Vilg Prasannanagr-I
38 Plate-XX-DGPS Vilg Prasannanagr-III
39 Site Inspection Report of DFO
40 Transportation plan
41 CA Bhuban-Plate-IV
42 Plate-XI-DGPS Sarang Vilg
43 Plate-XII-DGPS Vilg Nakeipasi-I
44 Plate-XIX-DGPS Vilg Prasannanagr-II
45 Plate-X-DGPS Vilg Teleipasi
46 RR-2
47 Abstract Tree enumeration-Non-Forest-67-68
48 All Undertakings
49 CA map-181
50 CA Scheme
51 Certificate Minimum use of Forest Land-147
52 Certificate Total Area Involved-63

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Anugul6375002716825522.39692437.8130/09/20231339.43953.9
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
AngulAngulDFOYesOne23/08/2023
 AngulCFYesOne09/11/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
AngulAngulDFO RecommendedThe proposal is recommended with the following conditions i Bangaru Jhor/ nallah is flowing through the expansion mine lease area. The user agency should prepare and implement proper diversion plan of the nallah with proper conservation measures of its catchment area. ii Soil and Moisture Conservation Plan over equivalent mine lease area in the catchment of Bangaru Jhar or Brahamani River shouldbe prepared & implemented by forest department at project cost tocompensate loss of hydrological serves. iii The User Agency should handover biologically reclaimed non forest land from its acquired area for taking up Compensatory Afforestation in Degraded Forest land as per undertaking submitted in the proposal. iv Site Specific Wildlife Management Plan and Regional Wildlife Management Plan should be prepared and implemented by the forest department at the project cost.
AngulCF RecommendedRecommended for acceptance subject to implementation of Site Specific Wildlife Conservation Plan at the project cost.Yes