PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MZ-011/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Mizoram
 (i) State / Union Territory : Mizoram  (ii) District : Lunglei  (iii) Forest Division : Lunglei  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.1088  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Drinking Water
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Lunglei0.1088Reserved Forest
Total 0.1088
Division 1. : Lunglei
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Lunglei0.1088
Total0.1088
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.10880.8Eco 1
Total. 0.1088


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Bischofia JavanicaKhuangthli000001
2OthersThuza001100
3OthersTufar001000
4OthersTlaizawng000101
5OthersVaube000100
6OthersBerawchal000001
7OthersBeltur001000
8OthersBul000100
9OthersTheiarlung001000
10OthersSahatah001100
11OthersNauthakpui000001
12OthersBuleng700000
13OthersBelphuar1200000
14OthersBatling1100000
15OthersChhimhruk900000
16OthersFartuah500000
17OthersHnahkiah1000000
18OthersKhaupui700000
19OthersSernam600000
20OthersPhaktel300000
21OthersSihneh700000
22OthersThakthing suak600000
23OthersThalteh600000
24OthersThingpuanchhia900000
25OthersThingsia700000
26Albzzia Spp.Vang1100000
Total 116 05 50 4
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 130


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Rehabilitation and plantation working circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed site is near the point of origin of river Tlawng, which is in its nascent stage and vulnerable to various disturbances
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The proposed site is very rich in biodiversity and various species of trees, herbs, medicinal plants, birds and animals are found
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 0.4333
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
110.2176Tlawnghnar RFLungleiLL_TLRF_2    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Site inspection photo
2 NPV Calculation
3 Site inspection report
4 Specific recommendation

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Lunglei45360035445844.8352.4720/03/20232.4743
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
LungleiSouthern circleDFOYesFour18/07/2022,20/01/2023,27/02/2023,20/03/2023
 Southern circleCFYesOne18/04/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
LungleiSouthern circleDFO Not-RecommendedDue to the reasons stated in the site inspection report, I do not recommend the proposal
Southern circleCF Not-RecommendedThe site for proposal for diversion of forest into non forest purpose for Tlawng hnar recharging dam for Aug Imp. of Zobawk WSS was visited by DFO five times during June 2022 to March 2023 and after thorough inspection he have not recommended the project. I also visited the proposed site 18.4.2023, this inspection the river course was devoid of water and the river channel was totally dry. It was reported that there was another impounding dam 300.72mt away from the present proposed site in the upstream. DFO in his inspection note stated that since the other dam was already constructed a few hundred metres away and the present proposed dam if constructed will make the river drier down the stream. It is also agreed with the view made by DFO after many visits of the site and it is apprehended that there shall not be sufficient water in few hundreds metres away since the other dam has already captured the available water. The proposed area for diversion of forest as mentioned in the proposal is 0.1088Ha but the degradation it will be causing to the pristine forest and beyond the project sites. From the scrutiny of the secondary information and present inspection considering to the destruction of forest it will be causing and the expected result for benefit of community cost – benefit which can be overseen from the present situation of availability of water in the river channel the project is Not Recommended. Yes
Nodal Officer Not-RecommendedObservation of DFO and CF concerned not recommending the proposal.