PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MP-088/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Madhya Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Madhya Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Harda,Hoshangabad,Betul
(iii)
Forest Division :
Harda(T),Hoshangabad(T),West Betul
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
11.399
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
West Betul
0.694
Protected Forest
2
West Betul
5.872
Reserved Forest
3
Hoshangabad(T)
4.772
Reserved Forest
4
Harda(T)
0.061
Reserved Forest
Total
11.399
Division 1. : Harda(T)
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Harda
0.061
Total
0.061
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.061
0.6
Eco 3
Total.
0.061
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Sagon
5
10
13
6
0
0
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Saja
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
Butea Monosperma
Palash
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
Misc. Species
Misc.
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
5
12
13
7
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
37
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Tiger (transient movement), Pangolin, leopard, Spotted deer, Chinkara, Barking deer, Blue bull, Sambar deer, Honey badger, Civets, Sloth bear, Hyena, Indian grey wolf, Wild boar, Jackal etc. are found in the area.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The land requirement will create a constraining effect on the dispersal of wildlife especially tigers and other large carnivores through the wildlife migration corridor.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The land requirement will create a constraining effect on the dispersal of wildlife especially tigers and other large carnivores through the wildlife migration corridor.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 2. : Hoshangabad(T)
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Hoshangabad
4.772
Total
4.772
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
4.772
0.5
Eco 3
Total.
4.772
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Teak
7
68
93
87
18
6
2
Others
palas, lendiya, moyan etc
0
20
23
9
7
8
Total
7
88
116
96
25
14
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
346
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
This area is prescribed under working plan prescription.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No sign of erosion found.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Cheetal, Wild Boar, Neelgai, Blackbuck, Jackal, Barking Deer.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Satpura Tiger Melghat corriedor is 0.64 km far away from the proposed area.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 3. : West Betul
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Betul
6.566
Total
6.566
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
6.566
0.6
Eco 3
Total.
6.566
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
TEAK
25
48
85
57
38
23
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
SAAJ
0
0
0
2
3
3
3
Others
MIXED
23
36
20
11
2
16
Total
48
84
105
70
43
42
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
392
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
NOT SO VULNERABLE.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
JACKAL,BEAR,MONKI,FOX, DEER,BISON ETC.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Inhance better communication in Area.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Inhance better communication in Area.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
121.09
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
25
PF
Hoshangabad
PF-1442
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Betul
1004300.00
389724.339
216.763
19
427.843
16/11/2022
0
0
2
Harda
333400
109584.296
1762.977
29
0
17/05/2023
0
1837.126
3
Hoshangabad
540823.00
87422.061
3912.09
60
240.50
13/12/2022
240.50
54.933
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Harda(T)
Hoshangabad(T)
DFO
Yes
One
17/05/2023
West Betul
Betul(T)
DFO
Yes
One
17/11/2022
Hoshangabad(T)
Hoshangabad(T)
DFO
Yes
One
02/12/2022
Betul(T)
CF
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Hoshangabad(T)
Hoshangabad(T)
DFO
Recommended
Construction of this road will provide the better transportation facility and passengers movement across the country. So I recommend for the diversion of the land mentioned avobe.
Harda(T)
Hoshangabad(T)
DFO
Recommended
Previously, land diversions for widening of NH 47 have been approved. The additional requirement of 0.061 hac. is for merger/junction construction and is necessary for safety compliance. Hence, the project is recommended in the larger public interest under the condition that adequate mitigation measures for wildlife are taken up in the area.
West Betul
Betul(T)
DFO
Recommended
It is recommended to implement this project as it will improve the livelihood of the local peoples.
Hoshangabad(T)
CF
Recommended
Recommended subject to mitigation measures being taken for wildlife
Yes
Betul(T)
CF
Recommended
Recommended vide letter no. 1090 dt 11 07 2023.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Madhya Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
13/10/2023
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Bhopal
Regional Office
6-MPR039/2023-BHO
05/02/2024
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MP/ROAD/153796/2022
ROAD1537962022668
28,373,339.00
28,373,300.00
2024-03-30
LMS4090050054347
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2024-03-19
2024-03-20
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
25
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
11
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
1
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
25
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Adarsh Dhanora Beat, Chicholi Range , West Betul Division
Location Details :
Adarsh Dhanora Beat, Chicholi Range , West Betul Division
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Protected Forest (PF-1442)
PF
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/MP/ROAD/153796/2022
06 Jun 2024
No Data
verify
21.
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Uploaded Letter
FP/MP/ROAD/153796/2022
06 Jun 2024
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/MP/ROAD/153796/2022
28 Jun 2024
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MP/ROAD/153796/2022
28 Jan 2025
APPROVED
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×